Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Philip K Lawrence

Biographic Data

ID4396755
NAMEPhilip K Lawrence
GIVEN NAMESPhilip K
FAMILY NAMELawrence
SIGNATURELAWRENCE P K
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Wales, Swansea
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS17
AUTHOR COUNT7
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1985
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1999
H-INDEX3
  • Enlightenment, modernity and war

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•History of the Human Sciences•1999•Cited by: 4•References: 3

    This article examines the emerging pattern of 19th-century warfare against the backdrop of Modernity’s expressed optimism regarding social and economic progress. The author argues that in the modern period western countries have been insufficiently conscious of the consequences of weapons of mass destruction and of their own involvement in acts of mass violence. The article identifies a modernist culture radically different from that articulated …

  • War and exclusion: The aesthetics of modernist violence

    Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Global Society•1998•Cited by: 1

    (1998). War and exclusion: The aesthetics of modernist violence. Global Society: Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 103-124

  • Strategy, Hegemony and Ideology: The Role of Intellectuals

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Political Studies•1996•Cited by: 8•References: 1

    This article argues that in the United States international relations scholars and political scientists have been significantly involved in the articulation of critical areas of state policy, especially in the arena of national security. The political significance of this is not merely a matter of individuals influencing policy; it concerns the construction of modes of discourse which legitimize aspects of state policy. In the problematic domain …

  • The Noncommensurability of Games Theory and Morality: A Response toward

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Politics•1988•References: 2

  • Strategy, the state and the Weberian legacy

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•1987•Cited by: 1•References: 4

    This article seeks to take further some themes that were touched on in an exchange of views that the author had with Gerald Segal in the Review in 1985. It aims to widen the scope of the theoretical discussion, to stipulate a more specific target for criticism and to clarify why the issues under scrutiny are so important

  • A reply

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•1985

    Gerald Segal's paper is an attempt at a scathing indictment of my analysis of some of the dilemmas and contradictions inherent in strategic studies. By way of a riposte I shall deal with the general and specific points which Segal makes, but more significantly I will show that he ignores the most fundamental arguments advanced in my paper

  • Nuclear strategy and political theory: A critical assessment

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•1985•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    In recent years the collapse of détente and the general deterioration in East-West relations have heightened fears that human evolution will terminate abruptly in a nuclear catastrophe. This foreboding is manifested in many facets of Western life: in the speeches of politicians; in popular culture; in mass movements; and in the working practices and consciousness of academics. At such times I believe that those of us who are specialists in areas …

  • Strategy, Hegemony and Ideology: The Role of Intellectuals

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Political Studies•1996•Cited by: 8•References: 1

    This article argues that in the United States international relations scholars and political scientists have been significantly involved in the articulation of critical areas of state policy, especially in the arena of national security. The political significance of this is not merely a matter of individuals influencing policy; it concerns the construction of modes of discourse which legitimize aspects of state policy. In the problematic domain …

  • Enlightenment, modernity and war

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•History of the Human Sciences•1999•Cited by: 4•References: 3

    This article examines the emerging pattern of 19th-century warfare against the backdrop of Modernity’s expressed optimism regarding social and economic progress. The author argues that in the modern period western countries have been insufficiently conscious of the consequences of weapons of mass destruction and of their own involvement in acts of mass violence. The article identifies a modernist culture radically different from that articulated …

  • Nuclear strategy and political theory: A critical assessment

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•1985•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    In recent years the collapse of détente and the general deterioration in East-West relations have heightened fears that human evolution will terminate abruptly in a nuclear catastrophe. This foreboding is manifested in many facets of Western life: in the speeches of politicians; in popular culture; in mass movements; and in the working practices and consciousness of academics. At such times I believe that those of us who are specialists in areas …

  • War and exclusion: The aesthetics of modernist violence

    Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Global Society•1998•Cited by: 1

    (1998). War and exclusion: The aesthetics of modernist violence. Global Society: Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 103-124

  • Strategy, the state and the Weberian legacy

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•1987•Cited by: 1•References: 4

    This article seeks to take further some themes that were touched on in an exchange of views that the author had with Gerald Segal in the Review in 1985. It aims to widen the scope of the theoretical discussion, to stipulate a more specific target for criticism and to clarify why the issues under scrutiny are so important

  • A reply

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•1985

    Gerald Segal's paper is an attempt at a scathing indictment of my analysis of some of the dilemmas and contradictions inherent in strategic studies. By way of a riposte I shall deal with the general and specific points which Segal makes, but more significantly I will show that he ignores the most fundamental arguments advanced in my paper

  • Nuclear strategy and political theory: A critical assessment

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•1985•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    In recent years the collapse of détente and the general deterioration in East-West relations have heightened fears that human evolution will terminate abruptly in a nuclear catastrophe. This foreboding is manifested in many facets of Western life: in the speeches of politicians; in popular culture; in mass movements; and in the working practices and consciousness of academics. At such times I believe that those of us who are specialists in areas …

  • Strategy, the state and the Weberian legacy

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•1987•Cited by: 1•References: 4

    This article seeks to take further some themes that were touched on in an exchange of views that the author had with Gerald Segal in the Review in 1985. It aims to widen the scope of the theoretical discussion, to stipulate a more specific target for criticism and to clarify why the issues under scrutiny are so important

  • The Noncommensurability of Games Theory and Morality: A Response toward

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Politics•1988•References: 2

  • Strategy, Hegemony and Ideology: The Role of Intellectuals

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Political Studies•1996•Cited by: 8•References: 1

    This article argues that in the United States international relations scholars and political scientists have been significantly involved in the articulation of critical areas of state policy, especially in the arena of national security. The political significance of this is not merely a matter of individuals influencing policy; it concerns the construction of modes of discourse which legitimize aspects of state policy. In the problematic domain …

  • War and exclusion: The aesthetics of modernist violence

    Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•Global Society•1998•Cited by: 1

    (1998). War and exclusion: The aesthetics of modernist violence. Global Society: Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 103-124

  • Enlightenment, modernity and war

    Open Access•Philip Lawrence, Philip K Lawrence•ARTICLE•History of the Human Sciences•1999•Cited by: 4•References: 3

    This article examines the emerging pattern of 19th-century warfare against the backdrop of Modernity’s expressed optimism regarding social and economic progress. The author argues that in the modern period western countries have been insufficiently conscious of the consequences of weapons of mass destruction and of their own involvement in acts of mass violence. The article identifies a modernist culture radically different from that articulated …

Political science (7 works) · Law (6 works) · Law (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Aesthetics (2 works) · Art (2 works) · Nuclear Issues and Defense (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae