Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evan Robert Farr

Biographic Data

ID4397336
NAMEEvan Robert Farr
GIVEN NAMESEvan Robert
FAMILY NAMEFarr
SIGNATUREFARR E R
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS2
TOTAL CITATIONS31
AUTHOR COUNT2
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2012
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2013
H-INDEX2
  • Reply to Thomassen

    Open Access•Stephen K White, Evan Robert Farr•ARTICLE•Political Theory•2013•Cited by: 2

  • No-Saying” in Habermas

    Open Access•Stephen K White, Evan Robert Farr•ARTICLE•Political Theory•2012•Cited by: 29

    Habermas’s paradigm of communicative action is usually taken to be pretty much dominated by consensus, “Yes-saying.” What if this were a radically one-sided perception? We take up this unorthodox position by arguing that “no-saying” in this paradigm is typically overlooked and underemphasized. To demonstrate this, we consider how negativity is figured at the most basic onto-ethical level in communicative action, as well as expressed in civil diso…

  • No-Saying” in Habermas

    Open Access•Stephen K White, Evan Robert Farr•ARTICLE•Political Theory•2012•Cited by: 29

    Habermas’s paradigm of communicative action is usually taken to be pretty much dominated by consensus, “Yes-saying.” What if this were a radically one-sided perception? We take up this unorthodox position by arguing that “no-saying” in this paradigm is typically overlooked and underemphasized. To demonstrate this, we consider how negativity is figured at the most basic onto-ethical level in communicative action, as well as expressed in civil diso…

  • Reply to Thomassen

    Open Access•Stephen K White, Evan Robert Farr•ARTICLE•Political Theory•2013•Cited by: 2

  • No-Saying” in Habermas

    Open Access•Stephen K White, Evan Robert Farr•ARTICLE•Political Theory•2012•Cited by: 29

    Habermas’s paradigm of communicative action is usually taken to be pretty much dominated by consensus, “Yes-saying.” What if this were a radically one-sided perception? We take up this unorthodox position by arguing that “no-saying” in this paradigm is typically overlooked and underemphasized. To demonstrate this, we consider how negativity is figured at the most basic onto-ethical level in communicative action, as well as expressed in civil diso…

  • Reply to Thomassen

    Open Access•Stephen K White, Evan Robert Farr•ARTICLE•Political Theory•2013•Cited by: 2

Epistemology (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Action (physics (1 works) · Agonism (1 works) · Civil disobedience (1 works) · Communicative action (1 works) · Critical Theory and Philosophy (1 works) · Democracy (1 works) · Law (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae