Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Shoshanna Ehrlich

Biographic Data

ID4409742
NAMEShoshanna Ehrlich
GIVEN NAMESShoshanna
FAMILY NAMEEhrlich
SIGNATUREEHRLICH S
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS2
TOTAL CITATIONS1
AUTHOR COUNT2
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2006
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX1
  • Dobbs , Gender Animus, and the Impact on Abortion Providers

    Open Access•Lori Brown, Alesha E Doan et al.•ARTICLE•Women & Politics•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 20

    In this article we engage in a critical legal analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in (Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization). We argue that by refusing to connect opposition to abortion with "invidiously discriminatory animus against women" (2246), the Court successfully insulated itself from having to consider the devastating impact overturning Roe v. Wade (Roe) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (Casey) would have on women's lives with…

  • Who decides: The Abortion Rights of Teens

    Shoshanna Ehrlich•BOOK•Who decides?•2006

  • Dobbs , Gender Animus, and the Impact on Abortion Providers

    Open Access•Lori Brown, Alesha E Doan et al.•ARTICLE•Women & Politics•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 20

    In this article we engage in a critical legal analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in (Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization). We argue that by refusing to connect opposition to abortion with "invidiously discriminatory animus against women" (2246), the Court successfully insulated itself from having to consider the devastating impact overturning Roe v. Wade (Roe) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (Casey) would have on women's lives with…

  • Who decides: The Abortion Rights of Teens

    Shoshanna Ehrlich•BOOK•Who decides?•2006

  • Dobbs , Gender Animus, and the Impact on Abortion Providers

    Open Access•Lori Brown, Alesha E Doan et al.•ARTICLE•Women & Politics•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 20

    In this article we engage in a critical legal analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in (Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization). We argue that by refusing to connect opposition to abortion with "invidiously discriminatory animus against women" (2246), the Court successfully insulated itself from having to consider the devastating impact overturning Roe v. Wade (Roe) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (Casey) would have on women's lives with…

Abortion (1 works) · Abortion (1 works) · Decision making (1 works) · Decision making (1 works) · Dissenting opinion (1 works) · Feminist Theory and Gender Studies (1 works) · Gender Studies (1 works) · Gender Studies (1 works) · Law (1 works) · Law (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae