Valerie J Caracelli
Biographic Data
| ID | 4411639 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Valerie J Caracelli |
| GIVEN NAMES | Valerie J |
| FAMILY NAME | Caracelli |
| SIGNATURE | CARACELLI V J |
| AFFILIATIONS | United States Government Accountability Office |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 15 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 6 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 15 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1983 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
An Oral History of Thomas A. Schwandt
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Oral History of Evaluation
In Memoriam
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Evaluator-Observer Comes to the Table
Quality, Context, and Use
Metaevaluations are systematic reviews of evaluations to determine the quality of their processes and findings. The knowledge about evaluation quality that results from metaevaluation of multiple evaluations can be used to inform researchers’ decisions about which studies to include in evaluation syntheses. Metaevaluations of multiple studies are also used to identify strengths and weaknesses in evaluation practice in order to develop evaluation …
Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed‐method evaluation
Current stances on mixing methods and paradigms are described and critiqued. Ideas are offered for advancing mixed‐method evaluation beyond age‐worn paradigm debates.
Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Four integrative data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs are derived from and illustrated by empirical practice: data transformation, typology development, extreme case analysis, and data consolidation/merging. The appropriateness of these strategies for different kinds of mixed-method intents is then discussed. Where appropriate, such integrative strategies are encouraged as ways to realize the full potential of mixed-method…
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
In recent years evaluators of educational and social programs have expanded their methodological repertoire with designs that include the use of both qualitative and quantitative methods. Such practice, however, needs to be grounded in a theory that can meaningfully guide the design and implementation of mixed-method evaluations. In this study, a mixed-method conceptual framework was developed from the theoretical literature and then refined thro…
The use of the psychosocial maturity inventory in evaluations of youth conservation corps programs
Quality, Context, and Use
Metaevaluations are systematic reviews of evaluations to determine the quality of their processes and findings. The knowledge about evaluation quality that results from metaevaluation of multiple evaluations can be used to inform researchers’ decisions about which studies to include in evaluation syntheses. Metaevaluations of multiple studies are also used to identify strengths and weaknesses in evaluation practice in order to develop evaluation …
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Oral History of Evaluation
The use of the psychosocial maturity inventory in evaluations of youth conservation corps programs
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
In recent years evaluators of educational and social programs have expanded their methodological repertoire with designs that include the use of both qualitative and quantitative methods. Such practice, however, needs to be grounded in a theory that can meaningfully guide the design and implementation of mixed-method evaluations. In this study, a mixed-method conceptual framework was developed from the theoretical literature and then refined thro…
Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Four integrative data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs are derived from and illustrated by empirical practice: data transformation, typology development, extreme case analysis, and data consolidation/merging. The appropriateness of these strategies for different kinds of mixed-method intents is then discussed. Where appropriate, such integrative strategies are encouraged as ways to realize the full potential of mixed-method…
Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed‐method evaluation
Current stances on mixing methods and paradigms are described and critiqued. Ideas are offered for advancing mixed‐method evaluation beyond age‐worn paradigm debates.
Quality, Context, and Use
Metaevaluations are systematic reviews of evaluations to determine the quality of their processes and findings. The knowledge about evaluation quality that results from metaevaluation of multiple evaluations can be used to inform researchers’ decisions about which studies to include in evaluation syntheses. Metaevaluations of multiple studies are also used to identify strengths and weaknesses in evaluation practice in order to develop evaluation …
The Evaluator-Observer Comes to the Table
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Oral History of Evaluation
In Memoriam
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Oral History of Evaluation
The Oral History of Evaluation
An Oral History of Thomas A. Schwandt
Evaluation and Performance Assessment (14 works) · Psychology (13 works) · Engineering (10 works) · Evaluation methods (7 works) · Computer Science (6 works) · Educational Assessment and Improvement (6 works) · Management science (6 works) · Oral history (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Reliability engineering (4 works)