Audun Gabriel Løvlie
Biographic Data
| ID | 4422107 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Audun Gabriel Løvlie |
| GIVEN NAMES | Audun Gabriel |
| FAMILY NAME | Løvlie |
| SIGNATURE | LØVLIE A G |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Bergen |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3732-9884 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Dilemmas of children’s participation and the role of practice guidelines: The views of judicial decision-makers in Norway
This study examines how judicial decision-makers in Norway address children’s participation in child welfare cases, focusing on their experiences with dilemmas and the role of practice guidelines. Guided by Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and Norwegian legislation, which establishes children’s right to be heard, in-depth interviews were conducted with 23 decision-makers from the Child Welfare Tribunal and District…
Balancing paternalism and child centrism: A Nordic population study on children's rights in child protection
Experts and migrants – A survey experiment on public acceptance of violence and child protection interventions
Do experts influence public attitudes toward familial violence and child protection interventions? Are public attitudes on familial violence and child protection interventions biased against migrant families? I conduct a vignette experiment survey on the Norwegian population’s acceptance of psychological and indirect violence to determine whether acceptance increases or decreases due to causal claims credited to experts and/or alleged violence in…
Evidence in Norwegian child protection interventions – Analysing cases of familial violence
How is expert evidence used in care order proceedings when children are considered for foster care placement because of familial violence? What are important factors and how do the decision‐makers use and evaluate evidence from specialists and experts? In this in‐depth analysis of 104 published care order decisions from the Norwegian County Boards, I investigate how decision‐makers use and evaluate evidence from expert witnesses to determine whet…
Evidence in Norwegian child protection interventions – Analysing cases of familial violence
How is expert evidence used in care order proceedings when children are considered for foster care placement because of familial violence? What are important factors and how do the decision‐makers use and evaluate evidence from specialists and experts? In this in‐depth analysis of 104 published care order decisions from the Norwegian County Boards, I investigate how decision‐makers use and evaluate evidence from expert witnesses to determine whet…
Evidence in Norwegian child protection interventions – Analysing cases of familial violence
How is expert evidence used in care order proceedings when children are considered for foster care placement because of familial violence? What are important factors and how do the decision‐makers use and evaluate evidence from specialists and experts? In this in‐depth analysis of 104 published care order decisions from the Norwegian County Boards, I investigate how decision‐makers use and evaluate evidence from expert witnesses to determine whet…
Experts and migrants – A survey experiment on public acceptance of violence and child protection interventions
Do experts influence public attitudes toward familial violence and child protection interventions? Are public attitudes on familial violence and child protection interventions biased against migrant families? I conduct a vignette experiment survey on the Norwegian population’s acceptance of psychological and indirect violence to determine whether acceptance increases or decreases due to causal claims credited to experts and/or alleged violence in…
Dilemmas of children’s participation and the role of practice guidelines: The views of judicial decision-makers in Norway
This study examines how judicial decision-makers in Norway address children’s participation in child welfare cases, focusing on their experiences with dilemmas and the role of practice guidelines. Guided by Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and Norwegian legislation, which establishes children’s right to be heard, in-depth interviews were conducted with 23 decision-makers from the Child Welfare Tribunal and District…
Balancing paternalism and child centrism: A Nordic population study on children's rights in child protection
Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Child Abuse and Trauma (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Medicine (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Child protection (2 works) · Children's Rights and Participation (2 works) · Environmental health (2 works) · Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 works)