Samuel V Bruton
Biographic Data
| ID | 4433582 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Samuel V Bruton |
| GIVEN NAMES | Samuel V |
| FAMILY NAME | Bruton |
| SIGNATURE | BRUTON S V |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Southern Mississippi |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5455-125X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 12 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 12 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 12 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Ordering matters in shared authorship
Behavioral Misconduct as a Basis for Scientific Retractions
Citation Ethics
Principal Investigators’ Priorities and Perceived Barriers and Facilitators When Making Decisions About Conducting Essential Research in the Covid-19 Pandemic
Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives
Skin in the Game
Two preregistered studies explored the likelihood paper reviewers would request clarification from authors regarding potential questionable research practices (QRPs). Study 1 participants were instructed to imagine reviewing a journal manuscript as either a coauthor or peer reviewer and rate the extent to which they would request clarification from the author when encountering potential QRPs. Participants reported greater likelihood of requesting…
Ethical Consistency and Experience
Over the past couple of decades, the apparent widespread occurrence of Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) in scientific research has been widely discussed in the research ethics literature as a source of concern. Various ways of reducing their use have been proposed and implemented, ranging from improved training and incentives for adopting best practices to systematic reforms. This article reports on the results of two studies that investiga…
In Defense of the Questionable
National Institutes of Health principal investigators reported their perceptions of the ethical defensibility, prevalence in their field, and their personal willingness to engage in questionable research practices (QRPs). Using ethical defensibility ratings, an exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution: behaviors considered unambiguously ethically indefensible and behaviors whose ethical defensibility was more ambiguous. In additi…
The ethics and politics of policing plagiarism
Recently, the usage of plagiarism detection software such as Turnitin® has increased dramatically among university instructors. At the same time, academic criticism of this software’s employment has also increased. We interviewed 23 faculty members from various departments at a medium-sized, public university in the southeastern US to determine their perspectives on Turnitin® and student plagiarism. We wanted to discern if there are important dis…
Financial Conflicts of Interest, Disclosure, and Academic Discipline
Peer assessments of researchers' financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) are crucial to effective FCOI management. We sought to determine how academics perceive FCOI disclosure and whether their perceptions vary depending on discipline and educational backgrounds. Participants (faculty and staff members from a multi-disciplinary academic medical center) responded to a questionnaire involving 10 hypothetical scenarios in which researchers either d…
Education Journal Editors’ Perspectives on Self-Plagiarism
Should It Be Considered Plagiarism?” Student Perceptions of Complex Citation Issues
Should It Be Considered Plagiarism?” Student Perceptions of Complex Citation Issues
Citation Ethics
Ethical Consistency and Experience
Over the past couple of decades, the apparent widespread occurrence of Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) in scientific research has been widely discussed in the research ethics literature as a source of concern. Various ways of reducing their use have been proposed and implemented, ranging from improved training and incentives for adopting best practices to systematic reforms. This article reports on the results of two studies that investiga…
Behavioral Misconduct as a Basis for Scientific Retractions
In Defense of the Questionable
National Institutes of Health principal investigators reported their perceptions of the ethical defensibility, prevalence in their field, and their personal willingness to engage in questionable research practices (QRPs). Using ethical defensibility ratings, an exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution: behaviors considered unambiguously ethically indefensible and behaviors whose ethical defensibility was more ambiguous. In additi…
Education Journal Editors’ Perspectives on Self-Plagiarism
Education Journal Editors’ Perspectives on Self-Plagiarism
Should It Be Considered Plagiarism?” Student Perceptions of Complex Citation Issues
The ethics and politics of policing plagiarism
Recently, the usage of plagiarism detection software such as Turnitin® has increased dramatically among university instructors. At the same time, academic criticism of this software’s employment has also increased. We interviewed 23 faculty members from various departments at a medium-sized, public university in the southeastern US to determine their perspectives on Turnitin® and student plagiarism. We wanted to discern if there are important dis…
Financial Conflicts of Interest, Disclosure, and Academic Discipline
Peer assessments of researchers' financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) are crucial to effective FCOI management. We sought to determine how academics perceive FCOI disclosure and whether their perceptions vary depending on discipline and educational backgrounds. Participants (faculty and staff members from a multi-disciplinary academic medical center) responded to a questionnaire involving 10 hypothetical scenarios in which researchers either d…
In Defense of the Questionable
National Institutes of Health principal investigators reported their perceptions of the ethical defensibility, prevalence in their field, and their personal willingness to engage in questionable research practices (QRPs). Using ethical defensibility ratings, an exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution: behaviors considered unambiguously ethically indefensible and behaviors whose ethical defensibility was more ambiguous. In additi…
Ethical Consistency and Experience
Over the past couple of decades, the apparent widespread occurrence of Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) in scientific research has been widely discussed in the research ethics literature as a source of concern. Various ways of reducing their use have been proposed and implemented, ranging from improved training and incentives for adopting best practices to systematic reforms. This article reports on the results of two studies that investiga…
Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives
Skin in the Game
Two preregistered studies explored the likelihood paper reviewers would request clarification from authors regarding potential questionable research practices (QRPs). Study 1 participants were instructed to imagine reviewing a journal manuscript as either a coauthor or peer reviewer and rate the extent to which they would request clarification from the author when encountering potential QRPs. Participants reported greater likelihood of requesting…
Principal Investigators’ Priorities and Perceived Barriers and Facilitators When Making Decisions About Conducting Essential Research in the Covid-19 Pandemic
Behavioral Misconduct as a Basis for Scientific Retractions
Citation Ethics
Ordering matters in shared authorship
Psychology (11 works) · Political science (10 works) · Academic integrity and plagiarism (8 works) · Law (7 works) · Law (6 works) · Social Psychology (6 works) · Medicine (5 works) · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 works) · Medical education (4 works) · Public relations (4 works)