Joshua Cunningham
Biographic Data
| ID | 4439603 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Joshua Cunningham |
| GIVEN NAMES | Joshua |
| FAMILY NAME | Cunningham |
| SIGNATURE | CUNNINGHAM J |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0761-9952 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
An eye for AI
Purpose This study aims to investigate whether individuals can accurately distinguish between visual artworks created by humans and those generated by artificial intelligence (AI). As generative AI platforms increasingly produce complex, human-like art, questions arise regarding authorship, perception and aesthetic value. By examining public ability to assign correct authorship to unlabeled artworks, this research contributes to discourse on digi…
Two years after ChatGPT
Purpose This study aims to investigate how first-year university students engage with generative AI tools, especially ChatGPT, in real academic contexts. As AI becomes more embedded in higher education, it is critical to understand how students use these technologies, what benefits they perceive and what concerns they raise. By analyzing 38 student reflections from a Fundamentals of Technology course, the study explores student motivations, behav…
Painting in gray
Purpose This paper aims to examine the legal and ethical challenges posed by the rise of AI-generated art, focusing on issues of copyright, authorship, and creativity. By analyzing legal precedents, such as Thaler v. US Copyright Office, and the broader implications of generative AI platforms, it explores how current laws fail to address the complexities of machine-created works. The paper explores the societal and philosophical impact of AI art …
Painting in gray
Purpose This paper aims to examine the legal and ethical challenges posed by the rise of AI-generated art, focusing on issues of copyright, authorship, and creativity. By analyzing legal precedents, such as Thaler v. US Copyright Office, and the broader implications of generative AI platforms, it explores how current laws fail to address the complexities of machine-created works. The paper explores the societal and philosophical impact of AI art …
Two years after ChatGPT
Purpose This study aims to investigate how first-year university students engage with generative AI tools, especially ChatGPT, in real academic contexts. As AI becomes more embedded in higher education, it is critical to understand how students use these technologies, what benefits they perceive and what concerns they raise. By analyzing 38 student reflections from a Fundamentals of Technology course, the study explores student motivations, behav…
Painting in gray
Purpose This paper aims to examine the legal and ethical challenges posed by the rise of AI-generated art, focusing on issues of copyright, authorship, and creativity. By analyzing legal precedents, such as Thaler v. US Copyright Office, and the broader implications of generative AI platforms, it explores how current laws fail to address the complexities of machine-created works. The paper explores the societal and philosophical impact of AI art …
An eye for AI
Purpose This study aims to investigate whether individuals can accurately distinguish between visual artworks created by humans and those generated by artificial intelligence (AI). As generative AI platforms increasingly produce complex, human-like art, questions arise regarding authorship, perception and aesthetic value. By examining public ability to assign correct authorship to unlabeled artworks, this research contributes to discourse on digi…
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 works) · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (2 works) · Generative grammar (2 works) · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 works) · AI in Service Interactions (1 work) · Art (1 work) · Art history (1 work) · Artificial Intelligence (1 work) · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (1 work) · Attribution (1 work)