Roger Ariew
Biographic Data
| ID | 444029 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Roger Ariew |
| GIVEN NAMES | Roger |
| FAMILY NAME | Ariew |
| SIGNATURE | ARIEW R |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of South Florida |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 36 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 37 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 35 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1977 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
René Descartes The Complete Correspondence in English Translation: From the Early Years to the Discourse on Method, 1619-1638, Vol. 1
The Intersections of Knowledge
Gregorio Baldin’s book, La croisée des savoirs , concerns the intellectual relations among Hobbes, Mersenne, and Descartes. The study is limited to the time between 1634 and 1648, starting when Hobbes first met Mersenne in Paris and ending when Mersenne died. It covers three main topics. Part i is devoted to the relations maintained by Hobbes with the circle of Mersenne during 1634–1636, which Baldin thinks are essential for the development of Ho…
A Metaphysical Element in Descartes and the First Cartesians
Descartes’ physics is dependent on his metaphysics, which is to say, on knowledge of the nature of God and of the human soul. This is clear throughout Descartes’ work, but it is especially so in the Principles of Philosophy, where Descartes devotes the first part of the treatise to the Principles of Human Knowledge, including God, the soul, and such common notions as substance (that is, the elements of metaphysics he initially discussed in Discou…
“Le meilleur livre qui ait jamais été fait en cette matière”
Modern Philosophy
Comments on John Schuster and Frederic de Buzon concerning Physico–Mathematics and Mathesis in Descartes
Descartes and the First Cartesians
This book adopts the perspective that we should not approach Rene Descartes as a solitary thinker, but as a philosopher who constructs a dialogue with his contemporaries, so as to engage them and elements of his society into his philosophical enterprise. Roger Ariew argues that an important aspect of this engagement concerns the endeavor to establish Cartesian philosophy in the Schools, that is, to replace Aristotle as the authority there. Descar…
La Logique de Port-Royal, les premiers cartésiens et la scolastique tardive
Dans quelle mesure la Logique de Port-Royal peut-elle être considérée comme une logique cartésienne ? Et dans quelle mesure l' Art de penser diffère-t-il des logiques antérieures ? Telles sont les deux questions, étroitement liées l'une à l'autre, auxquelles je souhaite répondre dans cette étude en procédant à une série de comparaisons, d'une part avec ce que Descartes appelait sa logique, d'autre part avec ce que les cartésiens de la première gé…
Summa Philosophiae Quadripartita or the Construction of the Late Scholastic Textbook
Descartes initially conceived the Principles of Philosophy as a comparison of his philosophy and that of the scholastics, intending the work to be a synopsis of his philosophy arranged in the same order as in the school curriculum, together with a summary of school philosophy; and he chose Eustachius a Sancto Paulo’s Summa Philosophiae Quadripartica for the task—“the best book of its kind ever made,” as he said. Descartes’ praise for Eustachius’ …
Descartes' Correspondence before Clerselier
Episodes of the wide diffusion of Galileo’s letters prompts me to consider whether the same thing could be demonstrated for Descartes. The question that interests me most is the circulation of Descartes’ correspondence before the publication of Clerselier’s edition of it, in three volumes, 1657–1667. Thus I examine the influence of Descartes’ unpublished correspondence in Jacques Du Roure’s La Philosophie divisée en toutes ses parties (Paris, 165…
Eloge
Abra de Raconis, Charles-François d’ (1580–1646)
Charles-François d’Abra de Raconis was born into a Calvinist family that converted to Catholicism in 1592. He taught philosophy at the Collège des Grassins and the Collège du Plessis and theology at the Collège de Navarre, all in Paris. Later he was appointed preacher of the court and royal almoner
The initial response to Galileo's lunar observations
Descartes
Descartes' Meditations
Introduction 1. That nothing is known Francisco Sanches 2. The promotion of mathematics Christopher Clavius 3. Dialectic Petrus Ramus 4. Metaphysical disputations Francisco Suarez 5. Wisdom Pierre Charron 6. A compendium of philosophy in four parts Eustachius a Sancto Paulo 7. Corpus of philosophy Scipion Dupleix 8. The use of reason: the impiety of the deists: the truth of the sciences Marin Mersenne 9. Unorthodox essays against the Aristotelian…
Descartes
Leibniz On the Unicorn and Various Other Curiosities
I discuss some of Leibniz's pronouncements about fringe phenomena--various monsters; talking dogs; genies and prophets; unicorns, glossopetrae, and other games of nature--in order to understand better Leibniz's views on science and the role these curiosities play in his plans for scientific academies and societies. However, given that Leibniz's sincerity has been called into question in twentieth-century secondary literature, I begin with a few h…
Le monde, l'homme . Rene Descartes, Annie Bitbol-Hesperies, Jean-Pierre Verdet
The Cartesian Destiny of Form and Matter
It would seem that there are enormous differences between strict hylomorphism and Cartesianism on form and matter: (i) for a strict hylomorphist, matter and form cannot be separated, but for a Cartesian, matter and form are really distinct ; (ii) for a strict hylomorphist, form is the principle of being and matter the principle of individuation, but for a Cartesian, the mind-a form-is the principle of individuation for persons, if anything is. Ho…
Gassendi's Ethics
L'harmonie et le chaos
Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition
Ideas, in and before Descartes
L'A. explore l'usage du terme idee au 17 e siecle, avant Descartes, et a la lumiere de cette nouvelle evidence reconsidere les sources possibles de son utilisation par Descartes et l'originalite de la conception cartesienne
Leibniz et la methode de la science. Francois Duchesneau
Descartes and the tree of knowledge
The Duhem Thesis
Galileo's lunar observations in the context of medieval lunar theory
Descartes and the tree of knowledge
The phases of venus before 1610
Theory of Comets at Paris During the Seventeenth Century
There is an important and growing literature on the tenacity and vitality of scholastic Aristotelianism in the seventeenth century, when (according to an older view) Aristotelianism was supposed to have become moribund and degenerative. 1 This literature emphasizes the importance of seeing late scholasticism as a living tradition, reacting to other intellectual movements and trying to come to terms with them.2 However, much work still needs to be…
Leibniz On the Unicorn and Various Other Curiosities
I discuss some of Leibniz's pronouncements about fringe phenomena--various monsters; talking dogs; genies and prophets; unicorns, glossopetrae, and other games of nature--in order to understand better Leibniz's views on science and the role these curiosities play in his plans for scientific academies and societies. However, given that Leibniz's sincerity has been called into question in twentieth-century secondary literature, I begin with a few h…
The Cartesian Destiny of Form and Matter
It would seem that there are enormous differences between strict hylomorphism and Cartesianism on form and matter: (i) for a strict hylomorphist, matter and form cannot be separated, but for a Cartesian, matter and form are really distinct ; (ii) for a strict hylomorphist, form is the principle of being and matter the principle of individuation, but for a Cartesian, the mind-a form-is the principle of individuation for persons, if anything is. Ho…
Did Ockham Use His Razor?
DID OCKHAM USE HIS RAZOR? In the philosophical literature of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the dictum called Ockham's razor that entities must not be multiplied without necessity1 is attributed to William of Ockham, the fourteenth century Franciscan philosopher.2 This principle is thought by some (Hamilton and perhaps Mill) to embody the Aristotelian dicta that God and Nature never operate without effect; they never operate superf…
Galileo's lunar observations in the context of medieval lunar theory
The Duhem Thesis
Descartes as critic of Galileo's scientific methodology
The phases of venus before 1610
A Study of Spinoza's Ethics
Medieval Cosmology
Duhem
Leibniz's Metaphysics
Descartes and the tree of knowledge
The Origins of Statics
Theory of Comets at Paris During the Seventeenth Century
There is an important and growing literature on the tenacity and vitality of scholastic Aristotelianism in the seventeenth century, when (according to an older view) Aristotelianism was supposed to have become moribund and degenerative. 1 This literature emphasizes the importance of seeing late scholasticism as a living tradition, reacting to other intellectual movements and trying to come to terms with them.2 However, much work still needs to be…
Leibniz et la methode de la science. Francois Duchesneau
Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition
Ideas, in and before Descartes
L'A. explore l'usage du terme idee au 17 e siecle, avant Descartes, et a la lumiere de cette nouvelle evidence reconsidere les sources possibles de son utilisation par Descartes et l'originalite de la conception cartesienne
L'harmonie et le chaos
Le monde, l'homme . Rene Descartes, Annie Bitbol-Hesperies, Jean-Pierre Verdet
The Cartesian Destiny of Form and Matter
It would seem that there are enormous differences between strict hylomorphism and Cartesianism on form and matter: (i) for a strict hylomorphist, matter and form cannot be separated, but for a Cartesian, matter and form are really distinct ; (ii) for a strict hylomorphist, form is the principle of being and matter the principle of individuation, but for a Cartesian, the mind-a form-is the principle of individuation for persons, if anything is. Ho…
Gassendi's Ethics
Leibniz On the Unicorn and Various Other Curiosities
I discuss some of Leibniz's pronouncements about fringe phenomena--various monsters; talking dogs; genies and prophets; unicorns, glossopetrae, and other games of nature--in order to understand better Leibniz's views on science and the role these curiosities play in his plans for scientific academies and societies. However, given that Leibniz's sincerity has been called into question in twentieth-century secondary literature, I begin with a few h…
Descartes
Descartes' Meditations
Introduction 1. That nothing is known Francisco Sanches 2. The promotion of mathematics Christopher Clavius 3. Dialectic Petrus Ramus 4. Metaphysical disputations Francisco Suarez 5. Wisdom Pierre Charron 6. A compendium of philosophy in four parts Eustachius a Sancto Paulo 7. Corpus of philosophy Scipion Dupleix 8. The use of reason: the impiety of the deists: the truth of the sciences Marin Mersenne 9. Unorthodox essays against the Aristotelian…
The initial response to Galileo's lunar observations
Descartes
Abra de Raconis, Charles-François d’ (1580–1646)
Charles-François d’Abra de Raconis was born into a Calvinist family that converted to Catholicism in 1592. He taught philosophy at the Collège des Grassins and the Collège du Plessis and theology at the Collège de Navarre, all in Paris. Later he was appointed preacher of the court and royal almoner
Philosophy (31 works) · Epistemology (18 works) · Historical Philosophy and Science (15 works) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (12 works) · Philosophy (12 works) · Art (10 works) · History (10 works) · Computer Science (9 works) · Humanities (8 works) · Art history (7 works)