Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Roger Ariew

Biographic Data

ID444029
NAMERoger Ariew
GIVEN NAMESRoger
FAMILY NAMEAriew
SIGNATUREARIEW R
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of South Florida
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS36
TOTAL CITATIONS37
WORKS AS AUTHOR35
WORKS AS EDITOR1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1977
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX4
  • René Descartes The Complete Correspondence in English Translation: From the Early Years to the Discourse on Method, 1619-1638, Vol. 1

    René Descartes, Roger Ariew et al.•EDITOR•BOOK•René Descartes : the Complete…•2023

  • The Intersections of Knowledge

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Hobbes Studies•2023

    Gregorio Baldin’s book, La croisée des savoirs , concerns the intellectual relations among Hobbes, Mersenne, and Descartes. The study is limited to the time between 1634 and 1648, starting when Hobbes first met Mersenne in Paris and ending when Mersenne died. It covers three main topics. Part i is devoted to the relations maintained by Hobbes with the circle of Mersenne during 1634–1636, which Baldin thinks are essential for the development of Ho…

  • A Metaphysical Element in Descartes and the First Cartesians

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•The European Legacy•2022•References: 3

    Descartes’ physics is dependent on his metaphysics, which is to say, on knowledge of the nature of God and of the human soul. This is clear throughout Descartes’ work, but it is especially so in the Principles of Philosophy, where Descartes devotes the first part of the treatise to the Principles of Human Knowledge, including God, the soul, and such common notions as substance (that is, the elements of metaphysics he initially discussed in Discou…

  • “Le meilleur livre qui ait jamais été fait en cette matière”

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•CHAPTER•Archimedes•2021

  • Modern Philosophy

    Roger Ariew, Eric Watkins•BOOK•Modern Philosophy•2019

  • Comments on John Schuster and Frederic de Buzon concerning Physico–Mathematics and Mathesis in Descartes

    Open Access•Roger Ariew, Zeta Books•ARTICLE•Journal of Early Modern Studies•2018

  • Descartes and the First Cartesians

    Roger Ariew•BOOK•Descartes and the First Cartesians•2015

    This book adopts the perspective that we should not approach Rene Descartes as a solitary thinker, but as a philosopher who constructs a dialogue with his contemporaries, so as to engage them and elements of his society into his philosophical enterprise. Roger Ariew argues that an important aspect of this engagement concerns the endeavor to establish Cartesian philosophy in the Schools, that is, to replace Aristotle as the authority there. Descar…

  • La Logique de Port-Royal, les premiers cartésiens et la scolastique tardive

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Archives de Philosophie•2015

    Dans quelle mesure la Logique de Port-Royal peut-elle être considérée comme une logique cartésienne ? Et dans quelle mesure l' Art de penser diffère-t-il des logiques antérieures ? Telles sont les deux questions, étroitement liées l'une à l'autre, auxquelles je souhaite répondre dans cette étude en procédant à une série de comparaisons, d'une part avec ce que Descartes appelait sa logique, d'autre part avec ce que les cartésiens de la première gé…

  • Summa Philosophiae Quadripartita or the Construction of the Late Scholastic Textbook

    Roger Ariew•CHAPTER•Descartes and the First Cartesians•2014

    Descartes initially conceived the Principles of Philosophy as a comparison of his philosophy and that of the scholastics, intending the work to be a synopsis of his philosophy arranged in the same order as in the school curriculum, together with a summary of school philosophy; and he chose Eustachius a Sancto Paulo’s Summa Philosophiae Quadripartica for the task—“the best book of its kind ever made,” as he said. Descartes’ praise for Eustachius’ …

  • Descartes' Correspondence before Clerselier

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Journal of Early Modern Studies•2012

    Episodes of the wide diffusion of Galileo’s letters prompts me to consider whether the same thing could be demonstrated for Descartes. The question that interests me most is the circulation of Descartes’ correspondence before the publication of Clerselier’s edition of it, in three volumes, 1657–1667. Thus I examine the influence of Descartes’ unpublished correspondence in Jacques Du Roure’s La Philosophie divisée en toutes ses parties (Paris, 165…

  • Eloge

    Richard Burian, Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•2009•References: 2

  • Abra de Raconis, Charles-François d’ (1580–1646)

    Roger Ariew•CHAPTER•2008

    Charles-François d’Abra de Raconis was born into a Calvinist family that converted to Catholicism in 1592. He taught philosophy at the Collège des Grassins and the Collège du Plessis and theology at the Collège de Navarre, all in Paris. Later he was appointed preacher of the court and royal almoner

  • The initial response to Galileo's lunar observations

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2001•References: 4

  • Descartes

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•2001

  • Descartes' Meditations

    Elizabeth Moles, Roger Ariew et al.•ARTICLE•The Modern Language Review•2000

    Introduction 1. That nothing is known Francisco Sanches 2. The promotion of mathematics Christopher Clavius 3. Dialectic Petrus Ramus 4. Metaphysical disputations Francisco Suarez 5. Wisdom Pierre Charron 6. A compendium of philosophy in four parts Eustachius a Sancto Paulo 7. Corpus of philosophy Scipion Dupleix 8. The use of reason: the impiety of the deists: the truth of the sciences Marin Mersenne 9. Unorthodox essays against the Aristotelian…

  • Descartes

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1999

  • Leibniz On the Unicorn and Various Other Curiosities

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Early Science and Medicine•1998•Cited by: 1

    I discuss some of Leibniz's pronouncements about fringe phenomena--various monsters; talking dogs; genies and prophets; unicorns, glossopetrae, and other games of nature--in order to understand better Leibniz's views on science and the role these curiosities play in his plans for scientific academies and societies. However, given that Leibniz's sincerity has been called into question in twentieth-century secondary literature, I begin with a few h…

  • Le monde, l'homme . Rene Descartes, Annie Bitbol-Hesperies, Jean-Pierre Verdet

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1997

  • The Cartesian Destiny of Form and Matter

    Marjorie Grene, Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Early Science and Medicine•1997•Cited by: 1

    It would seem that there are enormous differences between strict hylomorphism and Cartesianism on form and matter: (i) for a strict hylomorphist, matter and form cannot be separated, but for a Cartesian, matter and form are really distinct ; (ii) for a strict hylomorphist, form is the principle of being and matter the principle of individuation, but for a Cartesian, the mind-a form-is the principle of individuation for persons, if anything is. Ho…

  • Gassendi's Ethics

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1997

  • L'harmonie et le chaos

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1996

  • Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1995

  • Ideas, in and before Descartes

    Roger Ariew, Marjorie Grene•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1995

    L'A. explore l'usage du terme idee au 17 e siecle, avant Descartes, et a la lumiere de cette nouvelle evidence reconsidere les sources possibles de son utilisation par Descartes et l'originalite de la conception cartesienne

  • Leibniz et la methode de la science. Francois Duchesneau

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1994

  • Descartes and the tree of knowledge

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Synthese•1992•Cited by: 5•References: 8

Next
  • The Duhem Thesis

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1984•Cited by: 18•References: 4

  • Galileo's lunar observations in the context of medieval lunar theory

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1984•Cited by: 6•References: 2

  • Descartes and the tree of knowledge

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Synthese•1992•Cited by: 5•References: 8

  • The phases of venus before 1610

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1987•Cited by: 4•References: 5

  • Theory of Comets at Paris During the Seventeenth Century

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1992•Cited by: 2

    There is an important and growing literature on the tenacity and vitality of scholastic Aristotelianism in the seventeenth century, when (according to an older view) Aristotelianism was supposed to have become moribund and degenerative. 1 This literature emphasizes the importance of seeing late scholasticism as a living tradition, reacting to other intellectual movements and trying to come to terms with them.2 However, much work still needs to be…

  • Leibniz On the Unicorn and Various Other Curiosities

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Early Science and Medicine•1998•Cited by: 1

    I discuss some of Leibniz's pronouncements about fringe phenomena--various monsters; talking dogs; genies and prophets; unicorns, glossopetrae, and other games of nature--in order to understand better Leibniz's views on science and the role these curiosities play in his plans for scientific academies and societies. However, given that Leibniz's sincerity has been called into question in twentieth-century secondary literature, I begin with a few h…

  • The Cartesian Destiny of Form and Matter

    Marjorie Grene, Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Early Science and Medicine•1997•Cited by: 1

    It would seem that there are enormous differences between strict hylomorphism and Cartesianism on form and matter: (i) for a strict hylomorphist, matter and form cannot be separated, but for a Cartesian, matter and form are really distinct ; (ii) for a strict hylomorphist, form is the principle of being and matter the principle of individuation, but for a Cartesian, the mind-a form-is the principle of individuation for persons, if anything is. Ho…

  • Did Ockham Use His Razor?

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Franciscan studies•1977

    DID OCKHAM USE HIS RAZOR? In the philosophical literature of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the dictum called Ockham's razor that entities must not be multiplied without necessity1 is attributed to William of Ockham, the fourteenth century Franciscan philosopher.2 This principle is thought by some (Hamilton and perhaps Mill) to embody the Aristotelian dicta that God and Nature never operate without effect; they never operate superf…

  • Galileo's lunar observations in the context of medieval lunar theory

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1984•Cited by: 6•References: 2

  • The Duhem Thesis

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1984•Cited by: 18•References: 4

  • Descartes as critic of Galileo's scientific methodology

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Synthese•1986•References: 3

  • The phases of venus before 1610

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1987•Cited by: 4•References: 5

  • A Study of Spinoza's Ethics

    Roger Ariew, Jonathan Bennett•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1987

  • Medieval Cosmology

    James M Powell, Pierre Duhem et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1987

  • Duhem

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1991

  • Leibniz's Metaphysics

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1991

  • Descartes and the tree of knowledge

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Synthese•1992•Cited by: 5•References: 8

  • The Origins of Statics

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1992

  • Theory of Comets at Paris During the Seventeenth Century

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1992•Cited by: 2

    There is an important and growing literature on the tenacity and vitality of scholastic Aristotelianism in the seventeenth century, when (according to an older view) Aristotelianism was supposed to have become moribund and degenerative. 1 This literature emphasizes the importance of seeing late scholasticism as a living tradition, reacting to other intellectual movements and trying to come to terms with them.2 However, much work still needs to be…

  • Leibniz et la methode de la science. Francois Duchesneau

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1994

  • Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1995

  • Ideas, in and before Descartes

    Roger Ariew, Marjorie Grene•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1995

    L'A. explore l'usage du terme idee au 17 e siecle, avant Descartes, et a la lumiere de cette nouvelle evidence reconsidere les sources possibles de son utilisation par Descartes et l'originalite de la conception cartesienne

  • L'harmonie et le chaos

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1996

  • Le monde, l'homme . Rene Descartes, Annie Bitbol-Hesperies, Jean-Pierre Verdet

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1997

  • The Cartesian Destiny of Form and Matter

    Marjorie Grene, Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Early Science and Medicine•1997•Cited by: 1

    It would seem that there are enormous differences between strict hylomorphism and Cartesianism on form and matter: (i) for a strict hylomorphist, matter and form cannot be separated, but for a Cartesian, matter and form are really distinct ; (ii) for a strict hylomorphist, form is the principle of being and matter the principle of individuation, but for a Cartesian, the mind-a form-is the principle of individuation for persons, if anything is. Ho…

  • Gassendi's Ethics

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1997

  • Leibniz On the Unicorn and Various Other Curiosities

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Early Science and Medicine•1998•Cited by: 1

    I discuss some of Leibniz's pronouncements about fringe phenomena--various monsters; talking dogs; genies and prophets; unicorns, glossopetrae, and other games of nature--in order to understand better Leibniz's views on science and the role these curiosities play in his plans for scientific academies and societies. However, given that Leibniz's sincerity has been called into question in twentieth-century secondary literature, I begin with a few h…

  • Descartes

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•1999

  • Descartes' Meditations

    Elizabeth Moles, Roger Ariew et al.•ARTICLE•The Modern Language Review•2000

    Introduction 1. That nothing is known Francisco Sanches 2. The promotion of mathematics Christopher Clavius 3. Dialectic Petrus Ramus 4. Metaphysical disputations Francisco Suarez 5. Wisdom Pierre Charron 6. A compendium of philosophy in four parts Eustachius a Sancto Paulo 7. Corpus of philosophy Scipion Dupleix 8. The use of reason: the impiety of the deists: the truth of the sciences Marin Mersenne 9. Unorthodox essays against the Aristotelian…

  • The initial response to Galileo's lunar observations

    Open Access•Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2001•References: 4

  • Descartes

    Roger Ariew•ARTICLE•Isis•2001

  • Abra de Raconis, Charles-François d’ (1580–1646)

    Roger Ariew•CHAPTER•2008

    Charles-François d’Abra de Raconis was born into a Calvinist family that converted to Catholicism in 1592. He taught philosophy at the Collège des Grassins and the Collège du Plessis and theology at the Collège de Navarre, all in Paris. Later he was appointed preacher of the court and royal almoner

Philosophy (31 works) · Epistemology (18 works) · Historical Philosophy and Science (15 works) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (12 works) · Philosophy (12 works) · Art (10 works) · History (10 works) · Computer Science (9 works) · Humanities (8 works) · Art history (7 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae