Christian Erik J Kock
Biographic Data
| ID | 4450932 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Christian Erik J Kock |
| GIVEN NAMES | Christian Erik J |
| FAMILY NAME | Kock |
| SIGNATURE | KOCK C E J |
| AFFILIATIONS | IT University of Copenhagen |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 18 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1978 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Evaluating Public Deliberation
I argue that in evaluating public deliberation, the basic criterion should be how deliberating citizens’ need for usable input is met, rather than how the debaters embody Habermasian consensus-oriented ideals, and I question assessment of “deliberative quality” on that basis, such as the “Discourse Quality Index.” Studies of public deliberation should instead build on an Aristotelian notion of deliberation, on Rawls’s idea of “reasonable disagree…
Rhetorical citizenship
This article argues for the relevance of a rhetorical approach to the study of citizenship, proposing the concept of rhetorical citizenship as a term for a fourth dimension of citizenship and as a scholarly approach to the topic in addition to the dimensions of status, rights, and identity commonly recognized in the literature. We show how this view aligns with current views of the multidi Citizenship Studies mensionality of citizenship, explain …
Hvad er fornuftig uenighed
“Fornuftig uenighed” kunne være nøgleordet for det syn på offentlig politisk debat som jeg har arbejdet ud fra i bogen De svarer ikke, og som Ida Andersen har forholdt sig kritisk og konstruktivt til i en artikel i nærværende nummer af Sakprosa. Jeg tror man kan sige at Andersen og jeg er på samme overordnede linje i vores forståelse af politisk debat, men hun har også nogle forbehold og korrektioner. De handler dels om min opfattelse af Habermas…
Rhetoric That Shifts Votes
This article summarizes a study of 37 televised debates on political issues in Denmark, conducted live before representative audiences, with polls on the issues before and after each debate. These debates are of interest to research because they were authentic, and they supply data indicating persuasive effects. Various rhetorical features were observed and related to debaters success in attracting votes. In a qualitative interpretation of the ob…
In defense of a distinction
Rhetoric That Shifts Votes
This article summarizes a study of 37 televised debates on political issues in Denmark, conducted live before representative audiences, with polls on the issues before and after each debate. These debates are of interest to research because they were authentic, and they supply data indicating persuasive effects. Various rhetorical features were observed and related to debaters success in attracting votes. In a qualitative interpretation of the ob…
Rhetorical citizenship
This article argues for the relevance of a rhetorical approach to the study of citizenship, proposing the concept of rhetorical citizenship as a term for a fourth dimension of citizenship and as a scholarly approach to the topic in addition to the dimensions of status, rights, and identity commonly recognized in the literature. We show how this view aligns with current views of the multidi Citizenship Studies mensionality of citizenship, explain …
In defense of a distinction
Rhetoric That Shifts Votes
This article summarizes a study of 37 televised debates on political issues in Denmark, conducted live before representative audiences, with polls on the issues before and after each debate. These debates are of interest to research because they were authentic, and they supply data indicating persuasive effects. Various rhetorical features were observed and related to debaters success in attracting votes. In a qualitative interpretation of the ob…
Hvad er fornuftig uenighed
“Fornuftig uenighed” kunne være nøgleordet for det syn på offentlig politisk debat som jeg har arbejdet ud fra i bogen De svarer ikke, og som Ida Andersen har forholdt sig kritisk og konstruktivt til i en artikel i nærværende nummer af Sakprosa. Jeg tror man kan sige at Andersen og jeg er på samme overordnede linje i vores forståelse af politisk debat, men hun har også nogle forbehold og korrektioner. De handler dels om min opfattelse af Habermas…
Rhetorical citizenship
This article argues for the relevance of a rhetorical approach to the study of citizenship, proposing the concept of rhetorical citizenship as a term for a fourth dimension of citizenship and as a scholarly approach to the topic in addition to the dimensions of status, rights, and identity commonly recognized in the literature. We show how this view aligns with current views of the multidi Citizenship Studies mensionality of citizenship, explain …
Evaluating Public Deliberation
I argue that in evaluating public deliberation, the basic criterion should be how deliberating citizens’ need for usable input is met, rather than how the debaters embody Habermasian consensus-oriented ideals, and I question assessment of “deliberative quality” on that basis, such as the “Discourse Quality Index.” Studies of public deliberation should instead build on an Aristotelian notion of deliberation, on Rawls’s idea of “reasonable disagree…
Epistemology (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Rhetoric and Communication Studies (4 works) · Social Media and Politics (4 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Democracy (2 works) · Linguistics (2 works)