Dayei Oh
Biographic Data
| ID | 4451675 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Dayei Oh |
| GIVEN NAMES | Dayei |
| FAMILY NAME | Oh |
| SIGNATURE | OH D |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Helsinki |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6574-8103 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 7 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Social Identities in Twitter Issue Publics
In the digital age, platforms such as Twitter foster the emergence of fragmented issue-based communities online, intersecting with traditional media and broader national discourse. However, these digital public spheres often deviate from idealised concepts like those proposed by Habermas, showcasing uncivil discourse and participatory disparities. Recent research highlights a subset of hyperactive users on Twitter who monopolise discussions on co…
Does Algorithmic Content Moderation Rpomote Democratic Discourse? Radical Democratic Critique of Toxic Language Ai
Algorithmic content moderation is becoming a common practice employed by many social media platforms to regulate ‘toxic’ language and to promote democratic public conversations. This paper provides a normative critique of politically liberal assumption of civility embedded in algorithmic moderation, illustrated by Google’s Perspective API. From a radical democratic standpoint, this paper normatively and empirically distinguishes between incivilit…
Does algorithmic content moderation promote democratic discourse? Radical democratic critique of toxic language AI
Algorithmic content moderation is becoming a common practice employed by many social media platforms to regulate 'toxic' language and to promote democratic public conversations.This paper provides a normative critique of politically liberal assumption of civility embedded in algorithmic moderation, illustrated by Google's Perspective API.From a radical democratic standpoint, this paper normatively and empirically distinguishes between incivility …
American Abortion Culture Wars as Religious Populism
This paper explores the American abortion culture wars through the lens of religious populism, focusing on online discourse of the Christian pro-life confederation, Personhood Alliance. Drawing on Laclaudian post-foundationalist theories, the paper conceptualizes culture wars as a populist logic of meaning-making, where the floating signifier “truth” is central to mobilizing support and constructing Us-Them boundaries. The analysis identifies two…
Rush Hour of Populists
The introduction to the special issue develops a framework for understanding religious populism in hybrid media environments, emphasizing its role as a mode of meaning-making that intertwines political and religious logics. Moving beyond conventional approaches that frame religious populism as either the politicization of religion or the sacralization of politics, we highlight its capacity to shape collective identities through transcendencies—th…
Deliberative Qualities of Online Abortion Discourse
This paper provides a big-data-scale assessment of the deliberative qualities of online abortion discussions on Twitter in the United States (2020) and Ireland (2018) by specifically focusing on two standards: civility and tolerance for constructive disagreements. Using diverse computational methods and classification, our regression analysis provides mixed evaluations. We find that incivility and intolerance are uncommon behaviours in American a…
The ambivalent Internet
The Internet is often assumed to be full of unprecedented antagonism: nasty memes mocking anything from a death in someone’s family to terrorism and mass shootings, trolls harassing others just for
No prominent works on this page.
The ambivalent Internet
The Internet is often assumed to be full of unprecedented antagonism: nasty memes mocking anything from a death in someone’s family to terrorism and mass shootings, trolls harassing others just for
Deliberative Qualities of Online Abortion Discourse
This paper provides a big-data-scale assessment of the deliberative qualities of online abortion discussions on Twitter in the United States (2020) and Ireland (2018) by specifically focusing on two standards: civility and tolerance for constructive disagreements. Using diverse computational methods and classification, our regression analysis provides mixed evaluations. We find that incivility and intolerance are uncommon behaviours in American a…
Social Identities in Twitter Issue Publics
In the digital age, platforms such as Twitter foster the emergence of fragmented issue-based communities online, intersecting with traditional media and broader national discourse. However, these digital public spheres often deviate from idealised concepts like those proposed by Habermas, showcasing uncivil discourse and participatory disparities. Recent research highlights a subset of hyperactive users on Twitter who monopolise discussions on co…
Does Algorithmic Content Moderation Rpomote Democratic Discourse? Radical Democratic Critique of Toxic Language Ai
Algorithmic content moderation is becoming a common practice employed by many social media platforms to regulate ‘toxic’ language and to promote democratic public conversations. This paper provides a normative critique of politically liberal assumption of civility embedded in algorithmic moderation, illustrated by Google’s Perspective API. From a radical democratic standpoint, this paper normatively and empirically distinguishes between incivilit…
Does algorithmic content moderation promote democratic discourse? Radical democratic critique of toxic language AI
Algorithmic content moderation is becoming a common practice employed by many social media platforms to regulate 'toxic' language and to promote democratic public conversations.This paper provides a normative critique of politically liberal assumption of civility embedded in algorithmic moderation, illustrated by Google's Perspective API.From a radical democratic standpoint, this paper normatively and empirically distinguishes between incivility …
American Abortion Culture Wars as Religious Populism
This paper explores the American abortion culture wars through the lens of religious populism, focusing on online discourse of the Christian pro-life confederation, Personhood Alliance. Drawing on Laclaudian post-foundationalist theories, the paper conceptualizes culture wars as a populist logic of meaning-making, where the floating signifier “truth” is central to mobilizing support and constructing Us-Them boundaries. The analysis identifies two…
Rush Hour of Populists
The introduction to the special issue develops a framework for understanding religious populism in hybrid media environments, emphasizing its role as a mode of meaning-making that intertwines political and religious logics. Moving beyond conventional approaches that frame religious populism as either the politicization of religion or the sacralization of politics, we highlight its capacity to shape collective identities through transcendencies—th…
Political science (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Politics (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Social Media and Politics (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Abortion (3 works)