Arvid Samuelson
Biographic Data
| ID | 4460258 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Arvid Samuelson |
| GIVEN NAMES | Arvid |
| FAMILY NAME | Samuelson |
| SIGNATURE | SAMUELSON A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Cornell University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3771-1557 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
When Adolescents and Emerging Adults Think Reasonable People Can Disagree about Morality and Politics
Youth in a polarized society may attribute disagreements to the other side's irrationality and evil—or to the possibility that reasonable people can disagree on difficult issues. This study examined the determinants and consequences of moral reasonableness perceptions. Adolescents ( N = 131, M age = 15.88, 54% Female, 41% White) and emerging adults ( N = 65, M age = 19.83, 74% Female, 45% White) evaluated the difficulty of manipulated moral dilem…
Can reasonable people disagree about right and wrong? The determinants and implications of perceiving moral reasonableness
Beliefs About Wealth and Mobility are Related to Evaluations of Economic Inequalities
Testing the effectiveness of the Developing Inclusive Youth program: A multisite randomized control trial
The Developing Inclusive Youth program is a classroom-based, individually administered video tool that depicts peer-based social and racial exclusion, combined with teacher-led discussions. A multisite randomized control trial was implemented with 983 participants (502 females; 58.5% White, 41.5% Ethnic/racial minority; Mage = 9.64 years) in 48 third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade classrooms across six schools. Children in the program were more likel…
Students’ Reasoning About Whether to Report When Others Cheat: Conflict, Confusion, and Consequences
Nearly all students believe academic cheating is wrong, yet few students say they would report witnessed acts of cheating. To explain this apparent tension, the present research examined college students’ reasoning about whether to report plagiarism or other forms of cheating. Study 1 examined students’ conflicts when deciding whether to report cheating. Most students gave reasons against reporting a peer (e.g., social and physical consequences, …
Students’ Reasoning About Whether to Report When Others Cheat: Conflict, Confusion, and Consequences
Nearly all students believe academic cheating is wrong, yet few students say they would report witnessed acts of cheating. To explain this apparent tension, the present research examined college students’ reasoning about whether to report plagiarism or other forms of cheating. Study 1 examined students’ conflicts when deciding whether to report cheating. Most students gave reasons against reporting a peer (e.g., social and physical consequences, …
Students’ Reasoning About Whether to Report When Others Cheat: Conflict, Confusion, and Consequences
Nearly all students believe academic cheating is wrong, yet few students say they would report witnessed acts of cheating. To explain this apparent tension, the present research examined college students’ reasoning about whether to report plagiarism or other forms of cheating. Study 1 examined students’ conflicts when deciding whether to report cheating. Most students gave reasons against reporting a peer (e.g., social and physical consequences, …
Testing the effectiveness of the Developing Inclusive Youth program: A multisite randomized control trial
The Developing Inclusive Youth program is a classroom-based, individually administered video tool that depicts peer-based social and racial exclusion, combined with teacher-led discussions. A multisite randomized control trial was implemented with 983 participants (502 females; 58.5% White, 41.5% Ethnic/racial minority; Mage = 9.64 years) in 48 third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade classrooms across six schools. Children in the program were more likel…
Beliefs About Wealth and Mobility are Related to Evaluations of Economic Inequalities
When Adolescents and Emerging Adults Think Reasonable People Can Disagree about Morality and Politics
Youth in a polarized society may attribute disagreements to the other side's irrationality and evil—or to the possibility that reasonable people can disagree on difficult issues. This study examined the determinants and consequences of moral reasonableness perceptions. Adolescents ( N = 131, M age = 15.88, 54% Female, 41% White) and emerging adults ( N = 65, M age = 19.83, 74% Female, 45% White) evaluated the difficulty of manipulated moral dilem…
Can reasonable people disagree about right and wrong? The determinants and implications of perceiving moral reasonableness
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 works) · Ethics in Business and Education (2 works) · Moral disengagement (2 works) · Perception (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Academic integrity (1 works) · Academic integrity and plagiarism (1 works) · Cheating (1 works) · Child and Animal Learning Development (1 works) · Cognition (1 works)