Stephen J Scholte
Biographic Data
| ID | 4460692 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Stephen J Scholte |
| GIVEN NAMES | Stephen J |
| FAMILY NAME | Scholte |
| SIGNATURE | SCHOLTE S J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Sussex |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-4976-4215 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Serendipity and scientific styles
The generalizability of results from large-scale studies of science has often relied on the extent to which the studies can adequately control for differences across fields. However, disciplinary differences are not well understood. In this paper, we examine the extent to which disciplinary differences can be detected from inconsistencies in the use of a single word: serendipity. Drawing on Wittgenstein and an ordinary language analysis, we exami…
Making modafinil
How does a compound become a drug, and how do we decide for whom the drug is intended? Building a history of modafinil, this article examines how classification and serendipity affect drug development. We explore how mental health categories interact with drug development by tracing: how compound CRL40,476 was inadvertently created while exploring other compounds, and then became a focal point for development efforts; and how it secured Schedule …
Diagnosing Dissent
No prominent works on this page.
Diagnosing Dissent
Making modafinil
How does a compound become a drug, and how do we decide for whom the drug is intended? Building a history of modafinil, this article examines how classification and serendipity affect drug development. We explore how mental health categories interact with drug development by tracing: how compound CRL40,476 was inadvertently created while exploring other compounds, and then became a focal point for development efforts; and how it secured Schedule …
Serendipity and scientific styles
The generalizability of results from large-scale studies of science has often relied on the extent to which the studies can adequately control for differences across fields. However, disciplinary differences are not well understood. In this paper, we examine the extent to which disciplinary differences can be detected from inconsistencies in the use of a single word: serendipity. Drawing on Wittgenstein and an ordinary language analysis, we exami…
Political science (2 works) · Serendipity (2 works) · Affect (linguistics (1 work) · Business (1 work) · Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Conscientious objector (1 work) · Discipline (1 work) · Dissent (1 work) · Drug (1 work)