Marco Longobardo
Biographic Data
| ID | 4466405 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Marco Longobardo |
| GIVEN NAMES | Marco |
| FAMILY NAME | Longobardo |
| SIGNATURE | LONGOBARDO M |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Westminster |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6212-6093 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 9 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem
In the advisory opinion on the Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem (Opinion) rendered on July 19, 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), almost unanimously, determined that certain policies and practices undertaken by Israel in the Gaza Strip, West Bank, and East Jerusalem, the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) and occupation thereof, are …
Justice for atrocities
Access to justice for atrocities in the comparison of land-mark cases on state immunity in Brazil and Italy
The Italian Legislature and International and EU Obligations of Domestic Criminalisation
This article explores the nature and content of international and EU obligations to adopt certain criminal domestic legislation, and the impact that they have on the Italian legislature. In light of relevant international, EU, and domestic law provisions, the article investigates what is required of Italy to implement obligations of domestic criminalisation. It is argued that the Italian legislature is bound to implement obligations of domestic c…
Margaret deGuzman, Shocking the Conscience of Humanity
Drawing on an impressive collection of previous shorter pieces, Professor Margaret DeGuzman’s new book, Shocking the Conscience of Humanity: Gravity and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law,1 offers a new perspective on the entire international criminal justice project. In the author’s opinion, the concept of gravity of international crimes should be linked to the ‘values of the international community’ and, in particular, to the goal of …
State Immunity and Judicial Countermeasures
This article explores whether domestic courts can deny jurisdictional immunity of a state as a countermeasure. The article offers a survey of state practice that, according to some scholars, would support this argument, demonstrating that the corresponding practice is scarce, and that relevant domestic legislation denying jurisdictional immunity is not adopted as a countermeasure. Typically, countermeasures are adopted by political organs, which …
The Criminalisation of Intra-party Offences in Light of Some Recent icc Decisions on Children in Armed Conflict
Traditionally, international humanitarian law is considered to be applicable only to the relationship between different parties of an armed conflict, while domestic law and international human rights law address situations of intra-party conduct, i.e., conduct involving members of the same party only. In the recent case law of the International Criminal Court, however, intra-party offences against children used as child soldiers have been treated…
Everything Is Relative, Even Gravity
In 2014, the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court found that war crimes allegedly committed during the 2010 interception and boarding of the Comorian-registered Mavi Marmara , off the coast of Gaza, were of insufficient gravity to initiate an investigation. The Union of the Comoros sought review of this decision by Pre-Trial Chamber I, which concluded that the gravity evaluation was incorrect and requested the Prosecutor t…
Genocide, obligations erga omnes , and the responsibility to protect
In 2007, the International Court of Justice declared that states have a duty to prevent genocide from occurring in another state since the prevention and punishment of genocide is a concern of every state and of the international community as a whole. The doctrine of the responsibility to protect will be analysed in the light of the erga omnes and erga omnes partes character of the rules embodied in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment…
Genocide, obligations erga omnes , and the responsibility to protect
In 2007, the International Court of Justice declared that states have a duty to prevent genocide from occurring in another state since the prevention and punishment of genocide is a concern of every state and of the international community as a whole. The doctrine of the responsibility to protect will be analysed in the light of the erga omnes and erga omnes partes character of the rules embodied in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment…
Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem
In the advisory opinion on the Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem (Opinion) rendered on July 19, 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), almost unanimously, determined that certain policies and practices undertaken by Israel in the Gaza Strip, West Bank, and East Jerusalem, the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) and occupation thereof, are …
The Criminalisation of Intra-party Offences in Light of Some Recent icc Decisions on Children in Armed Conflict
Traditionally, international humanitarian law is considered to be applicable only to the relationship between different parties of an armed conflict, while domestic law and international human rights law address situations of intra-party conduct, i.e., conduct involving members of the same party only. In the recent case law of the International Criminal Court, however, intra-party offences against children used as child soldiers have been treated…
Everything Is Relative, Even Gravity
In 2014, the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court found that war crimes allegedly committed during the 2010 interception and boarding of the Comorian-registered Mavi Marmara , off the coast of Gaza, were of insufficient gravity to initiate an investigation. The Union of the Comoros sought review of this decision by Pre-Trial Chamber I, which concluded that the gravity evaluation was incorrect and requested the Prosecutor t…
Genocide, obligations erga omnes , and the responsibility to protect
In 2007, the International Court of Justice declared that states have a duty to prevent genocide from occurring in another state since the prevention and punishment of genocide is a concern of every state and of the international community as a whole. The doctrine of the responsibility to protect will be analysed in the light of the erga omnes and erga omnes partes character of the rules embodied in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment…
Everything Is Relative, Even Gravity
In 2014, the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court found that war crimes allegedly committed during the 2010 interception and boarding of the Comorian-registered Mavi Marmara , off the coast of Gaza, were of insufficient gravity to initiate an investigation. The Union of the Comoros sought review of this decision by Pre-Trial Chamber I, which concluded that the gravity evaluation was incorrect and requested the Prosecutor t…
The Criminalisation of Intra-party Offences in Light of Some Recent icc Decisions on Children in Armed Conflict
Traditionally, international humanitarian law is considered to be applicable only to the relationship between different parties of an armed conflict, while domestic law and international human rights law address situations of intra-party conduct, i.e., conduct involving members of the same party only. In the recent case law of the International Criminal Court, however, intra-party offences against children used as child soldiers have been treated…
The Italian Legislature and International and EU Obligations of Domestic Criminalisation
This article explores the nature and content of international and EU obligations to adopt certain criminal domestic legislation, and the impact that they have on the Italian legislature. In light of relevant international, EU, and domestic law provisions, the article investigates what is required of Italy to implement obligations of domestic criminalisation. It is argued that the Italian legislature is bound to implement obligations of domestic c…
Margaret deGuzman, Shocking the Conscience of Humanity
Drawing on an impressive collection of previous shorter pieces, Professor Margaret DeGuzman’s new book, Shocking the Conscience of Humanity: Gravity and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law,1 offers a new perspective on the entire international criminal justice project. In the author’s opinion, the concept of gravity of international crimes should be linked to the ‘values of the international community’ and, in particular, to the goal of …
State Immunity and Judicial Countermeasures
This article explores whether domestic courts can deny jurisdictional immunity of a state as a countermeasure. The article offers a survey of state practice that, according to some scholars, would support this argument, demonstrating that the corresponding practice is scarce, and that relevant domestic legislation denying jurisdictional immunity is not adopted as a countermeasure. Typically, countermeasures are adopted by political organs, which …
Access to justice for atrocities in the comparison of land-mark cases on state immunity in Brazil and Italy
Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem
In the advisory opinion on the Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem (Opinion) rendered on July 19, 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), almost unanimously, determined that certain policies and practices undertaken by Israel in the Gaza Strip, West Bank, and East Jerusalem, the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) and occupation thereof, are …
Justice for atrocities
Law (9 works) · Political science (9 works) · International Law and Human Rights (6 works) · Law (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Human rights (5 works) · International law (5 works) · Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 works) · Criminal law (3 works) · Economic Justice (3 works)