Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Paul Hufe

Biographic Data

ID4466953
NAMEPaul Hufe
GIVEN NAMESPaul
FAMILY NAMEHufe
SIGNATUREHUFE P
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Bristol
ORCID0000-0002-2264-761X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR5
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX0
  • Just cheap talk? Investigating fairness preferences in hypothetical scenarios

    Open Access•Paul Hufe, Daniel Weishaar•ARTICLE•The Journal of Economic Inequality•2025•References: 5

    The measurement of preferences often relies on surveys in which individuals evaluate hypothetical scenarios. This paper proposes and validates a novel factorial survey tool to measure fairness preferences. We examine whether a non-incentivized survey captures the same distributional preferences as an impartial spectator design, where choices may apply to a real person. In contrast to prior studies, our design involves high stakes, with respondent…

  • Learning income levels and inequality from spatial and sociodemographic data in Germany

    Open Access•Oana M Garbasevschi, Hannes Taubenböck et al.•ARTICLE•Applied Geography•2023

    This study explores the potential of predicting income inequality and income levels from attributes of the built, natural and social environment in Germany. Furthermore, it investigates differences in explanatory variables and estimation accuracy for municipalities with different social and spatial structure profiles. We use income tax data, the 2011 national census, and spatial data from various sources. The explanatory variables capture the spa…

  • Lower and upper bound estimates of inequality of opportunity for emerging economies

    Open Access•Paul Hufe, Andreas Peichl et al.•ARTICLE•Social Choice and Welfare•2022

    Equality of opportunity is an important normative ideal of distributive justice. In spite of its wide acceptance and economic relevance, standard estimation approaches suffer from data limitations that can lead to both downward and upward biased estimates of inequality of opportunity. These shortcomings may be particularly pronounced for emerging economies in which comprehensive household survey data of sufficient sample size is often unavailable…

  • The Roots of Inequality

    Paolo Brunori, Paul Hufe et al.•BOOK•2018

    This paper proposes a set of new methods to estimate inequality of opportunity based on conditional inference regression trees. It illustrates how these methods represent a substantial improvement over existing empirical approaches to measure inequality of opportunity. First, the new methods minimize the risk of arbitrary and ad hoc model selection. Second, they provide a standardized way to trade off upward and downward biases in inequality of o…

  • The local impacts of large-scale land acquisitions

    Paul Hufe, Daniel F Heuermann•ARTICLE•Journal of Contemporary African…•2017

    Large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs) are controversially discussed with respect to their local impacts. On the one hand, they are regarded as an opportunity for employment creation and a transfer of knowledge and technology, which enhances productivity and output in agriculture. On the other hand, they are said to impair food security and to foster land conflicts and environmental degradation. Despite the existence of numerous case studies, syst…

No prominent works on this page.

  • The local impacts of large-scale land acquisitions

    Paul Hufe, Daniel F Heuermann•ARTICLE•Journal of Contemporary African…•2017

    Large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs) are controversially discussed with respect to their local impacts. On the one hand, they are regarded as an opportunity for employment creation and a transfer of knowledge and technology, which enhances productivity and output in agriculture. On the other hand, they are said to impair food security and to foster land conflicts and environmental degradation. Despite the existence of numerous case studies, syst…

  • The Roots of Inequality

    Paolo Brunori, Paul Hufe et al.•BOOK•2018

    This paper proposes a set of new methods to estimate inequality of opportunity based on conditional inference regression trees. It illustrates how these methods represent a substantial improvement over existing empirical approaches to measure inequality of opportunity. First, the new methods minimize the risk of arbitrary and ad hoc model selection. Second, they provide a standardized way to trade off upward and downward biases in inequality of o…

  • Lower and upper bound estimates of inequality of opportunity for emerging economies

    Open Access•Paul Hufe, Andreas Peichl et al.•ARTICLE•Social Choice and Welfare•2022

    Equality of opportunity is an important normative ideal of distributive justice. In spite of its wide acceptance and economic relevance, standard estimation approaches suffer from data limitations that can lead to both downward and upward biased estimates of inequality of opportunity. These shortcomings may be particularly pronounced for emerging economies in which comprehensive household survey data of sufficient sample size is often unavailable…

  • Learning income levels and inequality from spatial and sociodemographic data in Germany

    Open Access•Oana M Garbasevschi, Hannes Taubenböck et al.•ARTICLE•Applied Geography•2023

    This study explores the potential of predicting income inequality and income levels from attributes of the built, natural and social environment in Germany. Furthermore, it investigates differences in explanatory variables and estimation accuracy for municipalities with different social and spatial structure profiles. We use income tax data, the 2011 national census, and spatial data from various sources. The explanatory variables capture the spa…

  • Just cheap talk? Investigating fairness preferences in hypothetical scenarios

    Open Access•Paul Hufe, Daniel Weishaar•ARTICLE•The Journal of Economic Inequality•2025•References: 5

    The measurement of preferences often relies on surveys in which individuals evaluate hypothetical scenarios. This paper proposes and validates a novel factorial survey tool to measure fairness preferences. We examine whether a non-incentivized survey captures the same distributional preferences as an impartial spectator design, where choices may apply to a real person. In contrast to prior studies, our design involves high stakes, with respondent…

Economics (3 works) · Geography (3 works) · Income, Poverty, and Inequality (3 works) · Inequality (3 works) · Economic inequality (2 works) · Agricultural risk and resilience (1 work) · Agriculture (1 work) · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (1 work) · Bounding overwatch (1 work) · Business (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae