Roxanne Taylor
Biographic Data
| ID | 4466999 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Roxanne Taylor |
| GIVEN NAMES | Roxanne |
| FAMILY NAME | Taylor |
| SIGNATURE | TAYLOR R |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Huddersfield |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3740-9278 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Identifying alternations in historical corpus data
This article revisits the diachrony of the genitive alternation, the alternation between ’s and prepositional phrases headed by of in Present-Day English. It is usually assumed to have developed around 1400 CE. For Old English ( c. 650–1000 CE), a different alternation between pre-modifying and post-modifying genitive-case-marked noun phrases is suggested to be the genitive alternation. Building on descriptions of competition between genitive-cas…
Language Use by Victims, Perpetrators, and Observers at the 1945 Belsen Trial
This article examines the use of language during one of the earliest moments of postwar scrutiny of and reflection on the Holocaust, namely the Belsen trial. The linguistic expression of the Holocaust by those who experienced it firsthand—primarily as victims but also as perpetrators—is compared with the linguistic expression of a set of secondhand observers of the Holocaust, namely British military legal personnel. As a case study, this article …
Lexical and functional adpositions
This article addresses the distinction amongst adpositions between those adpositions which are lexical and those which are functional. The article uses a corpus linguistic approach to address outstanding questions: whether there are two distinct subclasses of adposition, whether the distinction is a continuum amongst adpositions, and how— by what properties— lexical and functional adpositions are distinguished. The article argues for a primarily …
No prominent works on this page.
Lexical and functional adpositions
This article addresses the distinction amongst adpositions between those adpositions which are lexical and those which are functional. The article uses a corpus linguistic approach to address outstanding questions: whether there are two distinct subclasses of adposition, whether the distinction is a continuum amongst adpositions, and how— by what properties— lexical and functional adpositions are distinguished. The article argues for a primarily …
Language Use by Victims, Perpetrators, and Observers at the 1945 Belsen Trial
This article examines the use of language during one of the earliest moments of postwar scrutiny of and reflection on the Holocaust, namely the Belsen trial. The linguistic expression of the Holocaust by those who experienced it firsthand—primarily as victims but also as perpetrators—is compared with the linguistic expression of a set of secondhand observers of the Holocaust, namely British military legal personnel. As a case study, this article …
Identifying alternations in historical corpus data
This article revisits the diachrony of the genitive alternation, the alternation between ’s and prepositional phrases headed by of in Present-Day English. It is usually assumed to have developed around 1400 CE. For Old English ( c. 650–1000 CE), a different alternation between pre-modifying and post-modifying genitive-case-marked noun phrases is suggested to be the genitive alternation. Building on descriptions of competition between genitive-cas…
Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 works) · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (2 works) · Computer Science (1 work) · Determiner (1 work) · Expression (computer science (1 work) · Functional approach (1 work) · Genitive case (1 work) · Grammar (1 work) · Grammaticalization (1 work) · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (1 work)