Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Peter Machamer

Biographic Data

ID447161
NAMEPeter Machamer
GIVEN NAMESPeter
FAMILY NAMEMachamer
SIGNATUREMACHAMER P
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Pittsburgh
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS22
TOTAL CITATIONS431
AUTHOR COUNT19
EDITOR COUNT3
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1971
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2014
H-INDEX2
  • Thomas Hobbes

    Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•Hobbes Studies•2014

    In this essay, I present an overview of Hobbes as a consistent philosopher, perhaps the most consistent in the Early Modern period. First, I sketch how his endeavors have a cogency that is unrivalled, in many ways even to this day. Section 2 outlines Hobbes’s conception of philosophy and his causal materialism. Section 3 deals briefly with Hobbes’s discussion of sensation and then presents his views on the nature and function of language and how …

  • Phenomena, data and theories: A special issue of Synthese

    Open Access•Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 7

  • Philosophy of science and the study of religion

    Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•Religion•2009•References: 18

    This paper responds to the six papers from the Tokyo IAHR session

  • Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science

    Michael Silberstein, Peter Machamer•BOOK•Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy…•2008

  • Thinking about Causes: From Greek Philosophy to Modern Physics

    Peter Machamer, Gereon Wolters•BOOK•Thinking about Causes•2007

  • Neuroscience and Theoretical Psychology: What's to Worry About

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Justin Sytsma•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•2007

    This paper explores three connected claims about the interrelation of psychology and neuroscience that occur in discussions within theoretical psychology. The first and second claims are that neuroscience cannot offer a complete account of human psychology because it can show only correlations between neural events and cognitive or behavioral events. The third claim is that neuroscience ultimately is incomplete or irrelevant to psychological acco…

  • Descartes’s changing mind

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, J E Mcguire•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 3

  • Activities and Causation: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Mechanisms

    Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•International Studies in the…•2004

    This article deals with mechanisms conceived as composed of entities and activities. In response to many perplexities about the nature of activities, a number of arguments are developed concerning their epistemic and ontological status. Some questions concerning the relations between cause and causal explanation and mechanisms are also addressed.

  • The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science

    Open Access•Peter K Machamer, Peter Machamer et al.•BOOK•Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy…•2002

  • Biographies of Scientific Objects. Lorraine Daston

    Peter Machamer, Abel Franco•ARTICLE•Isis•2001

  • Clarity, charity and criticism, wit, wisdom and worldliness: Avoiding intellectual impositions

    Open Access•David Turnbull, Henry Krips et al.•ARTICLE•Metascience•2000

  • Scientific controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives

    Aristeidēs Baltas, Peter Machamer et al.•BOOK•Scientific controversies•2000

    "Recently, social constructivists have claimed that the outcomes of scientific debates are strongly influenced by non-evidential factors such as the rhetorical prowess and professional clout of the rival researchers. The collection presents historical studies and philosophical analyses that undermine the plausibility of an extreme social constructivist perspective, yet indicate the need for a richer and more realistic account of scientific ration…

  • Thinking about Mechanisms

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2000•Cited by: 415•References: 15

    The concept of mechanism is analyzed in terms of entities and activities, organized such that they are productive of regular changes. Examples show how mechanisms work in neurobiology and molecular biology. Thinking in terms of mechanisms provides a new framework for addressing many traditional philosophical issues: causality, laws, explanation, reduction, and scientific change

  • How values are in science

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Heather E Douglas et al.•ARTICLE•Critical Quarterly•1998

  • Mindscapes: Philosophy, Science, and the Mind

    Bahgat Korany, Ali E Hillal Dessouki et al.•BOOK•Mindscapes•1997

    -- 4 From Arab System to Middle Eastern System?: Regional Pressures and Constraints -- 5 Regional Leadership: Balancing off Costs and Dividends in the Foreign Policy of Egypt -- 6 Foreign Policy under Occupation: Does Iraq Need a Foreign Policy

  • Kitcher and the Achievement of Science

    Peter Machamer, Philip Kitcher•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1995

    Perhaps, the best way to approach a book with as broad a scope and as great an ambition as Philip Kitcher's The Advancement of Science is to think about its main goal. What vision is it trying to convey? Is it a worthy vision? Later one can ask how well it was done. Interestingly, the how-well-is-it-done question is essentially Kitcher's model of rationality. Rationality is a means-end equilibration, deciding what is rational in terms of how well…

  • Crises and cures in contemporary society

    Open Access•Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•Critical Quarterly•1990

  • Motion and Time, Space and Matter: Interrelations in the History of Philosophy and Science

    Edith Dudley Sylla, Edith Sylla et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1979

  • Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler . David C. Lindberg

    Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•Isis•1978

  • Aristotle on Natural Place and Natural Motion

    Peter Machamer, Peter K Machamer•ARTICLE•Isis•1978•Cited by: 2

  • Feyerabend and Galileo: The interaction of theories, and the reinterpretation of experience

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Peter K Machamer•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1973•Cited by: 9

  • A Recent Drawing of the Theory/Observation Distinction

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Peter K Machamer•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1971•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    James Cornman has recently offered a definition for ‘observation term’ which he takes to meet most, if not all, of the standard objections to such definitions. He also employs this definition against certain materialists, but in what follows I wish only to address myself to the proposed definition. I shall argue that he has failed to show any logical difference between “observation terms,” as he defines them, and terms which are not so classified…

  • Thinking about Mechanisms

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2000•Cited by: 415•References: 15

    The concept of mechanism is analyzed in terms of entities and activities, organized such that they are productive of regular changes. Examples show how mechanisms work in neurobiology and molecular biology. Thinking in terms of mechanisms provides a new framework for addressing many traditional philosophical issues: causality, laws, explanation, reduction, and scientific change

  • Feyerabend and Galileo: The interaction of theories, and the reinterpretation of experience

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Peter K Machamer•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1973•Cited by: 9

  • Phenomena, data and theories: A special issue of Synthese

    Open Access•Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 7

  • Aristotle on Natural Place and Natural Motion

    Peter Machamer, Peter K Machamer•ARTICLE•Isis•1978•Cited by: 2

  • A Recent Drawing of the Theory/Observation Distinction

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Peter K Machamer•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1971•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    James Cornman has recently offered a definition for ‘observation term’ which he takes to meet most, if not all, of the standard objections to such definitions. He also employs this definition against certain materialists, but in what follows I wish only to address myself to the proposed definition. I shall argue that he has failed to show any logical difference between “observation terms,” as he defines them, and terms which are not so classified…

  • Descartes’s changing mind

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, J E Mcguire•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 3

  • A Recent Drawing of the Theory/Observation Distinction

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Peter K Machamer•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1971•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    James Cornman has recently offered a definition for ‘observation term’ which he takes to meet most, if not all, of the standard objections to such definitions. He also employs this definition against certain materialists, but in what follows I wish only to address myself to the proposed definition. I shall argue that he has failed to show any logical difference between “observation terms,” as he defines them, and terms which are not so classified…

  • Feyerabend and Galileo: The interaction of theories, and the reinterpretation of experience

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Peter K Machamer•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1973•Cited by: 9

  • Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler . David C. Lindberg

    Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•Isis•1978

  • Aristotle on Natural Place and Natural Motion

    Peter Machamer, Peter K Machamer•ARTICLE•Isis•1978•Cited by: 2

  • Motion and Time, Space and Matter: Interrelations in the History of Philosophy and Science

    Edith Dudley Sylla, Edith Sylla et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1979

  • Crises and cures in contemporary society

    Open Access•Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•Critical Quarterly•1990

  • Kitcher and the Achievement of Science

    Peter Machamer, Philip Kitcher•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1995

    Perhaps, the best way to approach a book with as broad a scope and as great an ambition as Philip Kitcher's The Advancement of Science is to think about its main goal. What vision is it trying to convey? Is it a worthy vision? Later one can ask how well it was done. Interestingly, the how-well-is-it-done question is essentially Kitcher's model of rationality. Rationality is a means-end equilibration, deciding what is rational in terms of how well…

  • Mindscapes: Philosophy, Science, and the Mind

    Bahgat Korany, Ali E Hillal Dessouki et al.•BOOK•Mindscapes•1997

    -- 4 From Arab System to Middle Eastern System?: Regional Pressures and Constraints -- 5 Regional Leadership: Balancing off Costs and Dividends in the Foreign Policy of Egypt -- 6 Foreign Policy under Occupation: Does Iraq Need a Foreign Policy

  • How values are in science

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Heather E Douglas et al.•ARTICLE•Critical Quarterly•1998

  • Clarity, charity and criticism, wit, wisdom and worldliness: Avoiding intellectual impositions

    Open Access•David Turnbull, Henry Krips et al.•ARTICLE•Metascience•2000

  • Scientific controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives

    Aristeidēs Baltas, Peter Machamer et al.•BOOK•Scientific controversies•2000

    "Recently, social constructivists have claimed that the outcomes of scientific debates are strongly influenced by non-evidential factors such as the rhetorical prowess and professional clout of the rival researchers. The collection presents historical studies and philosophical analyses that undermine the plausibility of an extreme social constructivist perspective, yet indicate the need for a richer and more realistic account of scientific ration…

  • Thinking about Mechanisms

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2000•Cited by: 415•References: 15

    The concept of mechanism is analyzed in terms of entities and activities, organized such that they are productive of regular changes. Examples show how mechanisms work in neurobiology and molecular biology. Thinking in terms of mechanisms provides a new framework for addressing many traditional philosophical issues: causality, laws, explanation, reduction, and scientific change

  • Biographies of Scientific Objects. Lorraine Daston

    Peter Machamer, Abel Franco•ARTICLE•Isis•2001

  • The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science

    Open Access•Peter K Machamer, Peter Machamer et al.•BOOK•Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy…•2002

  • Activities and Causation: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Mechanisms

    Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•International Studies in the…•2004

    This article deals with mechanisms conceived as composed of entities and activities. In response to many perplexities about the nature of activities, a number of arguments are developed concerning their epistemic and ontological status. Some questions concerning the relations between cause and causal explanation and mechanisms are also addressed.

  • Descartes’s changing mind

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, J E Mcguire•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 3

  • Thinking about Causes: From Greek Philosophy to Modern Physics

    Peter Machamer, Gereon Wolters•BOOK•Thinking about Causes•2007

  • Neuroscience and Theoretical Psychology: What's to Worry About

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Justin Sytsma•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•2007

    This paper explores three connected claims about the interrelation of psychology and neuroscience that occur in discussions within theoretical psychology. The first and second claims are that neuroscience cannot offer a complete account of human psychology because it can show only correlations between neural events and cognitive or behavioral events. The third claim is that neuroscience ultimately is incomplete or irrelevant to psychological acco…

  • Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science

    Michael Silberstein, Peter Machamer•BOOK•Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy…•2008

  • Philosophy of science and the study of religion

    Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•Religion•2009•References: 18

    This paper responds to the six papers from the Tokyo IAHR session

  • Phenomena, data and theories: A special issue of Synthese

    Open Access•Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 7

  • Thomas Hobbes

    Peter Machamer•ARTICLE•Hobbes Studies•2014

    In this essay, I present an overview of Hobbes as a consistent philosopher, perhaps the most consistent in the Early Modern period. First, I sketch how his endeavors have a cogency that is unrivalled, in many ways even to this day. Section 2 outlines Hobbes’s conception of philosophy and his causal materialism. Section 3 deals briefly with Hobbes’s discussion of sensation and then presents his views on the nature and function of language and how …

Philosophy (16 works) · Epistemology (15 works) · Sociology (10 works) · Computer Science (9 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (9 works) · Psychology (6 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Philosophy of science (4 works) · Physics (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae