Michele Taruffo
Biographic Data
| ID | 449078 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Michele Taruffo |
| GIVEN NAMES | Michele |
| FAMILY NAME | Taruffo |
| SIGNATURE | TARUFFO M |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Pavia |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9339-6803 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Prawda sądowa i powoływanie się na fakty w postępowaniu cywilnym
The article deals with theoretical problems connected with the principle of adducing controversial facts in a given case by the parties. According to the principle it is assumed that only the parties have a right to establish facts on which the decision is to be based and, as a consequence, the judge cannot know and take into account facts which, being even indispensable for passing the decision, have not been clearly adducted by the party. The a…
Some remarks about relative plausibility
I submit a few remarks concerning some limits of the Allen and Pardo’s theory and about the validity of narrativism as a theory of judicial decisions. Moreover, I discuss disputable ideas of abductive inferences and of holistical decisions on the facts in issue. Finally I suggest the opportunity of dealing with the ‘maximisation of the weight of evidence’
Hermenêutica, prova e decisão
O artigo analisa diversos tópicos do processo judicial a partir da perspectiva das importantes contribuições oferecidas pela filosofia hermenêutica. Analisa-se principalmente a construção das narrativas fáticas, a apresentação da prova e a descoberta da verdade realizada pelo juiz na sua decisão final a partir das provas
Simplemente la verdad
Rethinking the Standards of Proof
A recent article entitled A Comparative View of Standards of Proof by Kevin Clermont and Emily Sherwin' has the merit of discussing an issue that is not frequently analyzed and of proposing some interesting remarks about several complex and puzzling topics. Since the authors' intention seems to be also that of starting a debate,2 this is a welcome opportunity, for a civilian lawyer and a comparativist to take part. The Clermont and Sherwin essay …
Some remarks about relative plausibility
I submit a few remarks concerning some limits of the Allen and Pardo’s theory and about the validity of narrativism as a theory of judicial decisions. Moreover, I discuss disputable ideas of abductive inferences and of holistical decisions on the facts in issue. Finally I suggest the opportunity of dealing with the ‘maximisation of the weight of evidence’
Rethinking the Standards of Proof
A recent article entitled A Comparative View of Standards of Proof by Kevin Clermont and Emily Sherwin' has the merit of discussing an issue that is not frequently analyzed and of proposing some interesting remarks about several complex and puzzling topics. Since the authors' intention seems to be also that of starting a debate,2 this is a welcome opportunity, for a civilian lawyer and a comparativist to take part. The Clermont and Sherwin essay …
Rethinking the Standards of Proof
A recent article entitled A Comparative View of Standards of Proof by Kevin Clermont and Emily Sherwin' has the merit of discussing an issue that is not frequently analyzed and of proposing some interesting remarks about several complex and puzzling topics. Since the authors' intention seems to be also that of starting a debate,2 this is a welcome opportunity, for a civilian lawyer and a comparativist to take part. The Clermont and Sherwin essay …
Simplemente la verdad
Hermenêutica, prova e decisão
O artigo analisa diversos tópicos do processo judicial a partir da perspectiva das importantes contribuições oferecidas pela filosofia hermenêutica. Analisa-se principalmente a construção das narrativas fáticas, a apresentação da prova e a descoberta da verdade realizada pelo juiz na sua decisão final a partir das provas
Some remarks about relative plausibility
I submit a few remarks concerning some limits of the Allen and Pardo’s theory and about the validity of narrativism as a theory of judicial decisions. Moreover, I discuss disputable ideas of abductive inferences and of holistical decisions on the facts in issue. Finally I suggest the opportunity of dealing with the ‘maximisation of the weight of evidence’
Prawda sądowa i powoływanie się na fakty w postępowaniu cywilnym
The article deals with theoretical problems connected with the principle of adducing controversial facts in a given case by the parties. According to the principle it is assumed that only the parties have a right to establish facts on which the decision is to be based and, as a consequence, the judge cannot know and take into account facts which, being even indispensable for passing the decision, have not been clearly adducted by the party. The a…
Epistemology (3 works) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Jury Decision Making Processes (2 works) · Legal processes and jurisprudence (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Aside (1 work) · Brazilian Legal Issues (1 work) · CLARITY (1 work)