L Edna Rogers‐millar
Biographic Data
| ID | 4513992 |
|---|---|
| NAME | L Edna Rogers‐millar |
| GIVEN NAMES | L Edna |
| FAMILY NAME | Rogers‐millar |
| SIGNATURE | MILLAR L E R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Cleveland State University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 74 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1979 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1979 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Relational Control and Dyadic Understanding
This paper attempts to explore the effects of domineeringness and dominance on spouses' ability to accurately predict each others' responses. Domineeringness and dominance are considered to be aspects of the dyad's relational communication structure and the accuracy of prediction is conceived of as an index of understanding. A modified stepwise regression procedure was used to derive the predictive models that accounted for 46% and 26% of the var…
Domineeringness and dominance
This paper continues the effort to define a dyadic system's relational structure on the basis of communicative behaviors. Domineeringness, an individual measure based on one‐up messages, and dominance, a joint measure based on the dyad's transactional patterns, are the central variables of concern. The findings offer additional support for the conceptual distinction between domineeringness and dominance. Further, these major variables are associa…
Domineeringness and Dominance
This paper attempts to clarify the conceptualization of interpersonal power dimensions and offers a relational-level definition and measure of dominance. A distinction is made between control movements indicating domineering message behavior and control patterns of dominance. The findings support (1) that domineeringness and dominance are separate control variables, and (2) that different dyadic patterns of satisfaction and interaction style are …
Domineeringness and Dominance
This paper attempts to clarify the conceptualization of interpersonal power dimensions and offers a relational-level definition and measure of dominance. A distinction is made between control movements indicating domineering message behavior and control patterns of dominance. The findings support (1) that domineeringness and dominance are separate control variables, and (2) that different dyadic patterns of satisfaction and interaction style are …
Domineeringness and dominance
This paper continues the effort to define a dyadic system's relational structure on the basis of communicative behaviors. Domineeringness, an individual measure based on one‐up messages, and dominance, a joint measure based on the dyad's transactional patterns, are the central variables of concern. The findings offer additional support for the conceptual distinction between domineeringness and dominance. Further, these major variables are associa…
Relational Control and Dyadic Understanding
This paper attempts to explore the effects of domineeringness and dominance on spouses' ability to accurately predict each others' responses. Domineeringness and dominance are considered to be aspects of the dyad's relational communication structure and the accuracy of prediction is conceived of as an index of understanding. A modified stepwise regression procedure was used to derive the predictive models that accounted for 46% and 26% of the var…
Relational Control and Dyadic Understanding
This paper attempts to explore the effects of domineeringness and dominance on spouses' ability to accurately predict each others' responses. Domineeringness and dominance are considered to be aspects of the dyad's relational communication structure and the accuracy of prediction is conceived of as an index of understanding. A modified stepwise regression procedure was used to derive the predictive models that accounted for 46% and 26% of the var…
Domineeringness and dominance
This paper continues the effort to define a dyadic system's relational structure on the basis of communicative behaviors. Domineeringness, an individual measure based on one‐up messages, and dominance, a joint measure based on the dyad's transactional patterns, are the central variables of concern. The findings offer additional support for the conceptual distinction between domineeringness and dominance. Further, these major variables are associa…
Domineeringness and Dominance
This paper attempts to clarify the conceptualization of interpersonal power dimensions and offers a relational-level definition and measure of dominance. A distinction is made between control movements indicating domineering message behavior and control patterns of dominance. The findings support (1) that domineeringness and dominance are separate control variables, and (2) that different dyadic patterns of satisfaction and interaction style are …
Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 works) · Dominance (genetics (2 works) · Transactional analysis (2 works) · Transactional leadership (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (1 work) · Cognitive and psychological constructs research (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work)