Frank E Millar

Biographic Data

ID4513993
NAMEFrank E Millar
GIVEN NAMESFrank E
FAMILY NAMEMillar
SIGNATUREMILLAR F E
AFFILIATIONSCleveland State University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS83
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1979
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1981
H-INDEX3

  • The Question of Validity

    L Edna Rogers, Frank E MillarARTICLEAnnals of the International…1981References: 9

  • Message Control Intensity as a Predictor of Transactional Redundancy

    John A Courtright, Frank E Millar et al.ARTICLEAnnals of the International…1980References: 8

    This paper explores the relationship between message control intensity and transactional redundancy. Message intensity was previously introduced in an effort to expand the Rogers-Farace relational communication coding system, and is based on the implicit intensity continuum that underlies that coding scheme. The transactional redundancy measure refers to and reflects the degree of randomness contained within a dyad's communicative behaviors. The …

  • Message control intensity

    L Edna Rogers, John A Courtright et al.ARTICLECommunication Monographs1980Cited by: 9References: 7

    This paper expands on the Rogers and Farace relational communication coding system by offering a definition and measure of message control intensity. The measure is based on the implicit intensity continuum which underlies the coding scheme. As a construct, message control intensity meets the face validity criterion for the "experienced" perspective on communication behavior as described by Poole and Folger. Results from exploratory correlational…

  • Relational Control and Dyadic Understanding

    Frank E Millar, L Edna Rogers‐millar et al.ARTICLEAnnals of the International…1979Cited by: 1References: 5

    This paper attempts to explore the effects of domineeringness and dominance on spouses' ability to accurately predict each others' responses. Domineeringness and dominance are considered to be aspects of the dyad's relational communication structure and the accuracy of prediction is conceived of as an index of understanding. A modified stepwise regression procedure was used to derive the predictive models that accounted for 46% and 26% of the var…

  • Domineeringness and dominance

    John A Courtright, Frank E Millar et al.ARTICLECommunication Monographs1979Cited by: 36References: 5

    This paper continues the effort to define a dyadic system's relational structure on the basis of communicative behaviors. Domineeringness, an individual measure based on one‐up messages, and dominance, a joint measure based on the dyad's transactional patterns, are the central variables of concern. The findings offer additional support for the conceptual distinction between domineeringness and dominance. Further, these major variables are associa…

  • Domineeringness and Dominance

    Open AccessL Edna Rogers-Millar, L Edna Rogers‐millar et al.ARTICLEHuman Communication Research1979Cited by: 37References: 12

    This paper attempts to clarify the conceptualization of interpersonal power dimensions and offers a relational-level definition and measure of dominance. A distinction is made between control movements indicating domineering message behavior and control patterns of dominance. The findings support (1) that domineeringness and dominance are separate control variables, and (2) that different dyadic patterns of satisfaction and interaction style are …