Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

V N Dobzhansky

Biographic Data

ID4534074
NAMEV N Dobzhansky
GIVEN NAMESV N
FAMILY NAMEDobzhansky
SIGNATUREDOBZHANSKY V N
AFFILIATIONSKemerovo State University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS2
TOTAL CITATIONS2
WORKS AS AUTHOR2
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2007
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2011
H-INDEX1
  • The “Kirghiz frontier” and the frontier volosts of the Tomsk Uyezd in the 17th century

    Open Access•V N Dobzhansky•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2011

    This article reviews the literature on various interpretations of the historical and geographical terms, the “Kirghiz frontier” and “frontier volosts” which often occur in the Russian documents of the 17th century relating to the history of Tomsk. The view of V.S. Sinyaev had been generally accepted for a long time; however, after A.Kh. Elert published historical and geographical descriptions of the Tomsk Uyezd and the Kuznetsk Uyezd by G.F. Müll…

  • Yenisei Kyrgyz “forts” in the 17th century

    Open Access•N Dobzhansky, V N Dobzhansky•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2007•Cited by: 2

    According to the view that is widely held by historians, each ulus (principality) of the Yenisei Kyrgyz had its own fort, the main function of which was to provide shelter during warfare (Abdykalykov, 1968: 8). For instance, S.V. Bakhrushin (1955: 183) stated that the Kyrgyz, “who were nomads and had no permanent place of residence, constructed fortifi ed shelters where they hid their wives, children, and livestock during raids against enemies. O…

  • Yenisei Kyrgyz “forts” in the 17th century

    Open Access•N Dobzhansky, V N Dobzhansky•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2007•Cited by: 2

    According to the view that is widely held by historians, each ulus (principality) of the Yenisei Kyrgyz had its own fort, the main function of which was to provide shelter during warfare (Abdykalykov, 1968: 8). For instance, S.V. Bakhrushin (1955: 183) stated that the Kyrgyz, “who were nomads and had no permanent place of residence, constructed fortifi ed shelters where they hid their wives, children, and livestock during raids against enemies. O…

  • Yenisei Kyrgyz “forts” in the 17th century

    Open Access•N Dobzhansky, V N Dobzhansky•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2007•Cited by: 2

    According to the view that is widely held by historians, each ulus (principality) of the Yenisei Kyrgyz had its own fort, the main function of which was to provide shelter during warfare (Abdykalykov, 1968: 8). For instance, S.V. Bakhrushin (1955: 183) stated that the Kyrgyz, “who were nomads and had no permanent place of residence, constructed fortifi ed shelters where they hid their wives, children, and livestock during raids against enemies. O…

  • The “Kirghiz frontier” and the frontier volosts of the Tomsk Uyezd in the 17th century

    Open Access•V N Dobzhansky•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2011

    This article reviews the literature on various interpretations of the historical and geographical terms, the “Kirghiz frontier” and “frontier volosts” which often occur in the Russian documents of the 17th century relating to the history of Tomsk. The view of V.S. Sinyaev had been generally accepted for a long time; however, after A.Kh. Elert published historical and geographical descriptions of the Tomsk Uyezd and the Kuznetsk Uyezd by G.F. Müll…

Archaeology (2 works) · Art (1 work) · Classics (1 work) · Economic geography (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · Frontier (1 work) · Geography (1 work) · Historiography (1 work) · History (1 work) · History (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae