Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Alan F Chalmers

Biographic Data

ID4589204
NAMEAlan F Chalmers
GIVEN NAMESAlan F
FAMILY NAMEChalmers
SIGNATURECHALMERS A F
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Sydney
ORCID0009-0005-7950-5355
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS30
TOTAL CITATIONS36
AUTHOR COUNT30
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1970
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
H-INDEX4
  • Viewing past science from the point of view of present science, thereby illuminating both: Philosophy versus experiment in the work of Robert Boyle

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2016

  • Qualitative novelty in seventeenth-century science: Hydrostatics from Stevin to Pascal

    Open Access•Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2015•References: 4

  • Creating a social space for modern science: Joseph Agassi: The very idea of modern science: Francis Bacon and Robert Boyle. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, xvii+315pp, €106.95 HB

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Metascience•2014

  • Understanding science through its history: A response to Newman

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 1

  • Drawing Philosophical Lessons from Perrin’s Experiments on Brownian Motion: A Response to van Fraassen

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2011•Cited by: 6

    In a recent article, van Fraassen has taken issue with the use to which Perrin’s experiments on Brownian motion have been put by philosophers, especially those defending scientific realism. He defends an alternative position by analysing the details of Perrin’s case in its historical context. In this reply, I argue that van Fraassen has not done the job well enough and I extend and in some respects attempt to correct his claims by close attention…

  • Boyle and the origins of modern chemistry: Newman tried in the fire

    Open Access•Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010•Cited by: 1•References: 8

  • The Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•BOOK•Scientist's Atom and the…•2009

  • Atomism Before Its Time

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Metascience•2006

  • Giving `Substance' to Chemistry

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Metascience•2004

  • Turning to Formulae for Solutions

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Metascience•2004

  • The Theory-Dependence of the Use of Instruments in Science

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2003•Cited by: 5•References: 5

    The idea that the use of instruments in science is theory-dependent seems to threaten the extent to which the output of those instruments can act as an independent arbiter of theory. This issue is explored by studying an early use of the electron microscope to observe dislocations in crystals. It is shown that this usage did indeed involve the theory of the electron microscope but that, nevertheless, it was possible to argue strongly for the expe…

  • Experiment versus mechanical philosophy in the work of Robert Boyle: A reply to Anstey and Pyle

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2002•Cited by: 6

  • Clarity, charity and criticism, wit, wisdom and worldliness: Avoiding intellectual impositions

    Open Access•David Turnbull, Henry Krips et al.•ARTICLE•Metascience•2000

  • Author’s response

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Metascience•2000

  • What can particle physicists count on

    Open Access•David Gooding, William J Mckinney et al.•ARTICLE•Metascience•1999

  • Grenzen der Wissenschaft

    Open Access•Alan F Chalmers, Niels Bergemann et al.•BOOK•Grenzen der Wissenschaft•1999

  • Did Democritus ascribe weight to atoms?

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1997

  • A Miller’s Tale

    Open Access•David Oldroyd, Phil Dowe et al.•ARTICLE•Metascience•1997

  • How to Defend Science Against Scepticism: A Reply to Barry Gower

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1989

  • The Sociology Of Knowledge And The Epistemological Status Of Science

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Thesis Eleven•1988

  • The Galileo that Feyerabend Missed: An Improved Case Against Method

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•CHAPTER•Politics and Rhetoric of…•1986

  • The heuristic role of Maxwell's mechanical model of electromagnetic phenomena

    Open Access•Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1986•Cited by: 2•References: 5

  • The Case Against a Universal, A-Historical Scientific Method

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•1985

  • Galileo's Telescopic Observations of Venus and Mars

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1985•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • Planetary Distances and Copernican Theory: A Reply

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1983•Cited by: 1

Next
  • Drawing Philosophical Lessons from Perrin’s Experiments on Brownian Motion: A Response to van Fraassen

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2011•Cited by: 6

    In a recent article, van Fraassen has taken issue with the use to which Perrin’s experiments on Brownian motion have been put by philosophers, especially those defending scientific realism. He defends an alternative position by analysing the details of Perrin’s case in its historical context. In this reply, I argue that van Fraassen has not done the job well enough and I extend and in some respects attempt to correct his claims by close attention…

  • Experiment versus mechanical philosophy in the work of Robert Boyle: A reply to Anstey and Pyle

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2002•Cited by: 6

  • The Theory-Dependence of the Use of Instruments in Science

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2003•Cited by: 5•References: 5

    The idea that the use of instruments in science is theory-dependent seems to threaten the extent to which the output of those instruments can act as an independent arbiter of theory. This issue is explored by studying an early use of the electron microscope to observe dislocations in crystals. It is shown that this usage did indeed involve the theory of the electron microscope but that, nevertheless, it was possible to argue strongly for the expe…

  • Curie's Principle

    Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1970•Cited by: 5•References: 4

  • Towards an Objectivist Account of Theory Change

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1979•Cited by: 4•References: 2

  • The heuristic role of Maxwell's mechanical model of electromagnetic phenomena

    Open Access•Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1986•Cited by: 2•References: 5

  • Galileo's Telescopic Observations of Venus and Mars

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1985•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • The Limitations of Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory

    Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Isis•1973•Cited by: 2

  • Understanding science through its history: A response to Newman

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 1

  • Boyle and the origins of modern chemistry: Newman tried in the fire

    Open Access•Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010•Cited by: 1•References: 8

  • Planetary Distances and Copernican Theory: A Reply

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1983•Cited by: 1

  • Planetary Distances in Copernican Theory

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1981•Cited by: 1•References: 1

  • Curie's Principle

    Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1970•Cited by: 5•References: 4

  • On Learning From Our Mistakes

    Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1973•References: 3

  • The Limitations of Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory

    Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Isis•1973•Cited by: 2

  • Towards an Objectivist Account of Theory Change

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1979•Cited by: 4•References: 2

  • Planetary Distances in Copernican Theory

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1981•Cited by: 1•References: 1

  • Planetary Distances and Copernican Theory: A Reply

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1983•Cited by: 1

  • The Case Against a Universal, A-Historical Scientific Method

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•1985

  • Galileo's Telescopic Observations of Venus and Mars

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1985•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • The Galileo that Feyerabend Missed: An Improved Case Against Method

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•CHAPTER•Politics and Rhetoric of…•1986

  • The heuristic role of Maxwell's mechanical model of electromagnetic phenomena

    Open Access•Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1986•Cited by: 2•References: 5

  • The Sociology Of Knowledge And The Epistemological Status Of Science

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Thesis Eleven•1988

  • How to Defend Science Against Scepticism: A Reply to Barry Gower

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1989

  • Did Democritus ascribe weight to atoms?

    Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1997

  • A Miller’s Tale

    Open Access•David Oldroyd, Phil Dowe et al.•ARTICLE•Metascience•1997

  • What can particle physicists count on

    Open Access•David Gooding, William J Mckinney et al.•ARTICLE•Metascience•1999

  • Grenzen der Wissenschaft

    Open Access•Alan F Chalmers, Niels Bergemann et al.•BOOK•Grenzen der Wissenschaft•1999

  • Clarity, charity and criticism, wit, wisdom and worldliness: Avoiding intellectual impositions

    Open Access•David Turnbull, Henry Krips et al.•ARTICLE•Metascience•2000

  • Author’s response

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Metascience•2000

  • Experiment versus mechanical philosophy in the work of Robert Boyle: A reply to Anstey and Pyle

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2002•Cited by: 6

  • The Theory-Dependence of the Use of Instruments in Science

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2003•Cited by: 5•References: 5

    The idea that the use of instruments in science is theory-dependent seems to threaten the extent to which the output of those instruments can act as an independent arbiter of theory. This issue is explored by studying an early use of the electron microscope to observe dislocations in crystals. It is shown that this usage did indeed involve the theory of the electron microscope but that, nevertheless, it was possible to argue strongly for the expe…

  • Giving `Substance' to Chemistry

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Metascience•2004

  • Turning to Formulae for Solutions

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Metascience•2004

  • Atomism Before Its Time

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Metascience•2006

  • The Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms

    Open Access•Alan Chalmers, Alan F Chalmers•BOOK•Scientist's Atom and the…•2009

  • Boyle and the origins of modern chemistry: Newman tried in the fire

    Open Access•Alan F Chalmers•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010•Cited by: 1•References: 8

Philosophy (29 works) · Epistemology (26 works) · Philosophy of science (14 works) · Computer Science (10 works) · Philosophy (10 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (10 works) · Historical Philosophy and Science (9 works) · Philosophy of biology (9 works) · Physics (9 works) · Philosophy of technology (8 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae