Asaf Ziderman
Biographic Data
| ID | 459748 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Asaf Ziderman |
| GIVEN NAMES | Asaf |
| FAMILY NAME | Ziderman |
| SIGNATURE | ZIDERMAN A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Open University of Israel |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Martin Buber's Dialogical Thought as a Philosophy of Action
HR Office Morality
Herman Levin Goldschmidt delineates and critiques four types of “dialogism,” four ways of derailing dialogical discourse and praxis. In the following, I examine two of them: “Pan-dialogism” is the glossing over the effect of power differentials such as gender, class, and race as relevant factors in the constitution of dialogue. “Pluralogic” is the evading of true dialogue, which is intense and exclusive, by conducting simultaneously multiple supe…
Better Use an Arrow
This paper corrects a pervasive mistake in readings of Buber’s iconic trope, “I-Thou” ( Ich-Du ; hereafter, I-You). The mistake lies in considering it synonymous to the principal concept of his dialogical thought, “relation” ( Beziehung ). A detailed reading of relevant passages in Buber’s I and Thou (hereafter, IAT ) reveals their difference: While both “relation” and “I-You” refer to the same reality—to the dialogic moment—they do so with a dif…
Martin Buber’s Dialogical Thought as a Philosophy of Action
This article presents a novel reading of Buber’s dialogical thought as an argument internal to the field of philosophy of action—namely, that action in its perfected form is necessarily dialogical. This work breaks rank with the consensus of previous scholarship that narrowly viewed Buber’s dialogical thought as a post-Kantian epistemology enlisted to solve the problem of access to noumenal reality and other minds. Judged through this prism, Bube…
No prominent works on this page.
Martin Buber’s Dialogical Thought as a Philosophy of Action
This article presents a novel reading of Buber’s dialogical thought as an argument internal to the field of philosophy of action—namely, that action in its perfected form is necessarily dialogical. This work breaks rank with the consensus of previous scholarship that narrowly viewed Buber’s dialogical thought as a post-Kantian epistemology enlisted to solve the problem of access to noumenal reality and other minds. Judged through this prism, Bube…
Better Use an Arrow
This paper corrects a pervasive mistake in readings of Buber’s iconic trope, “I-Thou” ( Ich-Du ; hereafter, I-You). The mistake lies in considering it synonymous to the principal concept of his dialogical thought, “relation” ( Beziehung ). A detailed reading of relevant passages in Buber’s I and Thou (hereafter, IAT ) reveals their difference: While both “relation” and “I-You” refer to the same reality—to the dialogic moment—they do so with a dif…
HR Office Morality
Herman Levin Goldschmidt delineates and critiques four types of “dialogism,” four ways of derailing dialogical discourse and praxis. In the following, I examine two of them: “Pan-dialogism” is the glossing over the effect of power differentials such as gender, class, and race as relevant factors in the constitution of dialogue. “Pluralogic” is the evading of true dialogue, which is intense and exclusive, by conducting simultaneously multiple supe…
Martin Buber's Dialogical Thought as a Philosophy of Action
Dialogical self (4 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Action (physics) (1 work)