Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

M Chirimuuta

Biographic Data

ID459938
NAMEM Chirimuuta
GIVEN NAMESM
FAMILY NAMEChirimuuta
SIGNATURECHIRIMUUTA M
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Pittsburgh
ORCID0000-0002-5967-9105
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS18
TOTAL CITATIONS70
AUTHOR COUNT18
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2014
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX4
  • Why are we still suffering from the blind spot

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Phenomenology and the Cognitive…•2025

  • From the Reflex Machine to the Changeable Brain

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Human Arenas•2025

    The brain is exceedingly complex. Neuroscientists have used the tried and tested simplification methods of physics, such as mathematical idealization, in order to deal with neural complexity. This paper queries the appropriateness of certain physics-derived strategies within this biological science by presenting a historical case study (the reflex theory) in which scientists fell into the trap of over-simplifying the brain and nervous system. It …

  • The Prehistory of the Idea that Thinking is Modelling

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Human Arenas•2025

    This paper examines early expositions of the idea that to think about an object is to construct and manipulate an internal model of that object. The origin of this idea is normally credited to Kenneth Craik (1943) but here I show that it is prefigured in the writings of two nineteenth century physicist-psychologists, Hermann von Helmholtz and Ernst Mach

  • The Brain Abstracted: Simplification in the History and Philosophy of Neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•BOOK•The Brain Abstracted•2024•Cited by: 5

    An exciting, new framework for interpreting the philosophical significance of neuroscience. All science needs to simplify, but when the object of research is something as complicated as the brain, this challenge can stretch the limits of scientific possibility. In fact, in The Brain Abstracted, an avowedly "opinionated" history of neuroscience, M. Chirimuuta argues that, due to the brain's complexity, neuroscientific theories have only captured p…

  • Haptic realism for neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 24

    Recent work in philosophy of science has shown how the challenges posed by extremely complex systems require that scientists employ a range of modelling strategies, leading to partial perspectives that make apparently conflicting claims about the target (Mitchell 2009b, Longino 2013). The brain is of course extremely complex, and the same arguments apply here. In this paper I present a variety of perspectivism called haptic realism . This account…

  • Reflex theory, cautionary tale: Misleading simplicity in early neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 31

    This paper takes an integrated history and philosophy of science approach to the topic of "simplicity out of complexity". The reflex theory was a framework within early twentieth century psychology and neuroscience which aimed to decompose complex behaviours and neural responses into simple reflexes. It was controversial in its time, and did not live up to its own theoretical and empirical ambitions. Examination of this episode poses important qu…

  • Prediction versus understanding in computationally enhanced neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 54

  • Naturalism and the philosophy of colour ontology and perception

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 52

  • Synthesis of contraries: Hughlings Jackson on sensory-motor representation in the brain

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 7

  • Explanation in Computational Neuroscience: Causal and Non-causal

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2018•Cited by: 19•References: 51

    This article examines three candidate cases of non-causal explanation in computational neuroscience. I argue that there are instances of efficient coding explanation that are strongly analogous to examples of non-causal explanation in physics and biology, as presented by Batterman ([2002]), Woodward ([2003]), and Lange ([2013]). By integrating Lange’s and Woodward’s accounts, I offer a new way to elucidate the distinction between causal and non-c…

  • Hughlings Jackson and the “doctrine of concomitance”: Mind-brain theorising between metaphysics and the clinic

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2017•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Crash Testing an Engineering Framework in Neuroscience: Does the Idea of Robustness Break Down

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2017•References: 18

    In this article, I discuss the concept of robustness in neuroscience. Various mechanisms for making systems robust have been discussed across biology and neuroscience (e.g., redundancy and fail-safes). Many of these notions originate from engineering. I argue that concepts borrowed from engineering aid neuroscientists in (1) operationalizing robustness, (2) formulating hypotheses about mechanisms for robustness, and (3) quantifying robustness. Fu…

  • Précis of Outside Color

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017•References: 1

  • Replies

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • Why the “stimulus-error” did not go away

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 21

  • Vision, Perspectivism, and Haptic Realism

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2016•Cited by: 4•References: 9

    In this article I examine the perceptual metaphor at the heart of perspectivism, discussing three elements: partiality, interestedness, and interaction. I argue that perspectivists should drop the visual metaphor in favor of a haptic one. Because the sense of touch requires contact and purposeful exploration on the part of the perceiver, it is obvious that with touch one apprehends an extradermal reality in virtue of and not in spite of its inter…

  • Minimal models and canonical neural computations: The distinctness of computational explanation in neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014•Cited by: 29•References: 79

  • Psychophysical Methods and the Evasion of Introspection

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2014•Cited by: 4•References: 7

    In this paper I argue that certain methodological conventions within psychophysics reflect a continued uncertainty over the reliability of subjects’ introspective judgements. Firstly, different psychophysical methods do not rely equally on the introspective capabilities of experimental subjects. I contrast “minimally introspective” tasks with “introspection-reliant” ones. It is only in the latter that introspection can be said to have a nontrivia…

  • Minimal models and canonical neural computations: The distinctness of computational explanation in neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014•Cited by: 29•References: 79

  • Explanation in Computational Neuroscience: Causal and Non-causal

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2018•Cited by: 19•References: 51

    This article examines three candidate cases of non-causal explanation in computational neuroscience. I argue that there are instances of efficient coding explanation that are strongly analogous to examples of non-causal explanation in physics and biology, as presented by Batterman ([2002]), Woodward ([2003]), and Lange ([2013]). By integrating Lange’s and Woodward’s accounts, I offer a new way to elucidate the distinction between causal and non-c…

  • The Brain Abstracted: Simplification in the History and Philosophy of Neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•BOOK•The Brain Abstracted•2024•Cited by: 5

    An exciting, new framework for interpreting the philosophical significance of neuroscience. All science needs to simplify, but when the object of research is something as complicated as the brain, this challenge can stretch the limits of scientific possibility. In fact, in The Brain Abstracted, an avowedly "opinionated" history of neuroscience, M. Chirimuuta argues that, due to the brain's complexity, neuroscientific theories have only captured p…

  • Vision, Perspectivism, and Haptic Realism

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2016•Cited by: 4•References: 9

    In this article I examine the perceptual metaphor at the heart of perspectivism, discussing three elements: partiality, interestedness, and interaction. I argue that perspectivists should drop the visual metaphor in favor of a haptic one. Because the sense of touch requires contact and purposeful exploration on the part of the perceiver, it is obvious that with touch one apprehends an extradermal reality in virtue of and not in spite of its inter…

  • Psychophysical Methods and the Evasion of Introspection

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2014•Cited by: 4•References: 7

    In this paper I argue that certain methodological conventions within psychophysics reflect a continued uncertainty over the reliability of subjects’ introspective judgements. Firstly, different psychophysical methods do not rely equally on the introspective capabilities of experimental subjects. I contrast “minimally introspective” tasks with “introspection-reliant” ones. It is only in the latter that introspection can be said to have a nontrivia…

  • Naturalism and the philosophy of colour ontology and perception

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 52

  • Why the “stimulus-error” did not go away

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 21

  • Haptic realism for neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 24

    Recent work in philosophy of science has shown how the challenges posed by extremely complex systems require that scientists employ a range of modelling strategies, leading to partial perspectives that make apparently conflicting claims about the target (Mitchell 2009b, Longino 2013). The brain is of course extremely complex, and the same arguments apply here. In this paper I present a variety of perspectivism called haptic realism . This account…

  • Reflex theory, cautionary tale: Misleading simplicity in early neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 31

    This paper takes an integrated history and philosophy of science approach to the topic of "simplicity out of complexity". The reflex theory was a framework within early twentieth century psychology and neuroscience which aimed to decompose complex behaviours and neural responses into simple reflexes. It was controversial in its time, and did not live up to its own theoretical and empirical ambitions. Examination of this episode poses important qu…

  • Prediction versus understanding in computationally enhanced neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 54

  • Synthesis of contraries: Hughlings Jackson on sensory-motor representation in the brain

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 7

  • Hughlings Jackson and the “doctrine of concomitance”: Mind-brain theorising between metaphysics and the clinic

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2017•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Minimal models and canonical neural computations: The distinctness of computational explanation in neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014•Cited by: 29•References: 79

  • Psychophysical Methods and the Evasion of Introspection

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2014•Cited by: 4•References: 7

    In this paper I argue that certain methodological conventions within psychophysics reflect a continued uncertainty over the reliability of subjects’ introspective judgements. Firstly, different psychophysical methods do not rely equally on the introspective capabilities of experimental subjects. I contrast “minimally introspective” tasks with “introspection-reliant” ones. It is only in the latter that introspection can be said to have a nontrivia…

  • Why the “stimulus-error” did not go away

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 21

  • Vision, Perspectivism, and Haptic Realism

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2016•Cited by: 4•References: 9

    In this article I examine the perceptual metaphor at the heart of perspectivism, discussing three elements: partiality, interestedness, and interaction. I argue that perspectivists should drop the visual metaphor in favor of a haptic one. Because the sense of touch requires contact and purposeful exploration on the part of the perceiver, it is obvious that with touch one apprehends an extradermal reality in virtue of and not in spite of its inter…

  • Hughlings Jackson and the “doctrine of concomitance”: Mind-brain theorising between metaphysics and the clinic

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2017•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Crash Testing an Engineering Framework in Neuroscience: Does the Idea of Robustness Break Down

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2017•References: 18

    In this article, I discuss the concept of robustness in neuroscience. Various mechanisms for making systems robust have been discussed across biology and neuroscience (e.g., redundancy and fail-safes). Many of these notions originate from engineering. I argue that concepts borrowed from engineering aid neuroscientists in (1) operationalizing robustness, (2) formulating hypotheses about mechanisms for robustness, and (3) quantifying robustness. Fu…

  • Précis of Outside Color

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017•References: 1

  • Replies

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • Explanation in Computational Neuroscience: Causal and Non-causal

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2018•Cited by: 19•References: 51

    This article examines three candidate cases of non-causal explanation in computational neuroscience. I argue that there are instances of efficient coding explanation that are strongly analogous to examples of non-causal explanation in physics and biology, as presented by Batterman ([2002]), Woodward ([2003]), and Lange ([2013]). By integrating Lange’s and Woodward’s accounts, I offer a new way to elucidate the distinction between causal and non-c…

  • Synthesis of contraries: Hughlings Jackson on sensory-motor representation in the brain

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 7

  • Naturalism and the philosophy of colour ontology and perception

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 52

  • Reflex theory, cautionary tale: Misleading simplicity in early neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 31

    This paper takes an integrated history and philosophy of science approach to the topic of "simplicity out of complexity". The reflex theory was a framework within early twentieth century psychology and neuroscience which aimed to decompose complex behaviours and neural responses into simple reflexes. It was controversial in its time, and did not live up to its own theoretical and empirical ambitions. Examination of this episode poses important qu…

  • Prediction versus understanding in computationally enhanced neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 54

  • Haptic realism for neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Synthese•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 24

    Recent work in philosophy of science has shown how the challenges posed by extremely complex systems require that scientists employ a range of modelling strategies, leading to partial perspectives that make apparently conflicting claims about the target (Mitchell 2009b, Longino 2013). The brain is of course extremely complex, and the same arguments apply here. In this paper I present a variety of perspectivism called haptic realism . This account…

  • The Brain Abstracted: Simplification in the History and Philosophy of Neuroscience

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•BOOK•The Brain Abstracted•2024•Cited by: 5

    An exciting, new framework for interpreting the philosophical significance of neuroscience. All science needs to simplify, but when the object of research is something as complicated as the brain, this challenge can stretch the limits of scientific possibility. In fact, in The Brain Abstracted, an avowedly "opinionated" history of neuroscience, M. Chirimuuta argues that, due to the brain's complexity, neuroscientific theories have only captured p…

  • Why are we still suffering from the blind spot

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Phenomenology and the Cognitive…•2025

  • From the Reflex Machine to the Changeable Brain

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Human Arenas•2025

    The brain is exceedingly complex. Neuroscientists have used the tried and tested simplification methods of physics, such as mathematical idealization, in order to deal with neural complexity. This paper queries the appropriateness of certain physics-derived strategies within this biological science by presenting a historical case study (the reflex theory) in which scientists fell into the trap of over-simplifying the brain and nervous system. It …

  • The Prehistory of the Idea that Thinking is Modelling

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•ARTICLE•Human Arenas•2025

    This paper examines early expositions of the idea that to think about an object is to construct and manipulate an internal model of that object. The origin of this idea is normally credited to Kenneth Craik (1943) but here I show that it is prefigured in the writings of two nineteenth century physicist-psychologists, Hermann von Helmholtz and Ernst Mach

Computer Science (14 works) · Philosophy (13 works) · Epistemology (12 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (12 works) · Psychology (12 works) · Cognitive science (10 works) · Artificial Intelligence (7 works) · Neuroscience (7 works) · Artificial Intelligence (6 works) · Philosophy of science (6 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae