Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tad M Schmaltz

Biographic Data

ID459941
NAMETad M Schmaltz
GIVEN NAMESTad M
FAMILY NAMESchmaltz
SIGNATURESCHMALTZ T M
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Michigan
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS24
TOTAL CITATIONS5
AUTHOR COUNT19
EDITOR COUNT5
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1991
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX2
  • The Cartesian Brain: Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives

    Denis Kambouchner, Damien Lacroux et al.•BOOK•The Cartesian Brain•2024

    International audience

  • The indefinite in the Descartes-More correspondence

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•British Journal for the History…•2021

    In this article, I consider Descartes’ enigmatic claim that we must assert that the material world is indefinite rather than infinite. The focus here is on the discussion of this claim in Descartes’ late correspondence with More. One puzzle that emerges from this correspondence is that Descartes insists to More that we are not in a position to deny the indefinite universe has limits, while at the same time indicating that we conceive a contradict…

  • Descartes and the Ontology of Everyday Life

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2021

    Descartes offers a view of the material world that identifies matter with indefinitely divisible extension. Such a view also eliminates the various substantial forms that, for his Scholastic contemporaries, serve to distinguish the natural substances of our experience, the paradigmatic instances of which are living things. These contemporaries countered that this view presents the world as a barren desert landscape, devoid of the variety of every…

  • Gueroult on Spinoza and the Ethics

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Revue internationale de philosophie•2020

    Cet article concerne l’application de la méthode « dianoématique », ou « étude des doctrines », dans le commentaire important de Martial Gueroult aux deux premières parties de l’ Éthique de Spinoza. Gueroult met l’accent sur deux affirmations distinctes dans les deux volumes de ce commentaire. La première affirmation, tirée du premier volume, est que Spinoza adopte une version du monisme dans la première partie de l’ Éthique selon laquelle Dieu, …

  • Gueroult on Spinoza and the Ethics

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Revue internationale de philosophie•2020

  • Introduction: Material Substance and Quantity, from Suárez to Leibniz

    Jean-Pascal Anfray, Jean‐Pascal Anfray et al.•ARTICLE•Vivarium•2020

  • Quantity and Extension in Suárez and Descartes

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Vivarium•2020

    This paper compares the development of the notion of continuous quantity in the work of Francisco Suárez and René Descartes. The discussion begins with a consideration of Suárez’s rejection of the view – common to ‘realists’ such as Thomas Aquinas and ‘nominalists’ such as William of Ockham – that quantity is inseparable from the extension of material integral parts. Crucial here is Suárez’s view that quantified extension exhibits a kind of impen…

  • The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism

    Steven Nadler, Tad M Schmaltz et al.•BOOK•Oxford Handbook of Descartes and…•2019

    A collection of fifty essays on Descartes and his influence in the seventeenth century. The first section is devoted to various aspects of Descartes’s philosophy (biography, epistemology, metaphysics, natural philosophy (science), mathematics, philosophical theology, etc.). The second section is devoted to Descartes’s influence, especially Cartesians and the Cartesian movement, in France, the Netherlands, Italy, England and elsewhere. The third s…

  • Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism

    Delphine Antoine-Mahut, Steven Nadler et al.•BOOK•Oxford Handbook of Descartes and…•2019

    The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism comprises fifty specially written chapters on Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and Cartesianism, the dominant paradigm for philosophy and science in the seventeenth century, written by an international group of leading scholars of early modern philosophy. The first part focuses on the various aspects of Descartes's biography (including his background, intellectual contexts, writings, and correspondence)…

  • Pierre-Daniel Huet, Skeptic Critic of Cartesianism and Defender of Religion

    Thomas M Lennon, Steven Nadler et al.•CHAPTER•Oxford Handbook of Descartes and…•2019

    Pierre-Daniel Huet (1630–1721) was Cartesianism’s most implacable critic ever. And more than any other critic, he raised the Cartesian issues that have been of perennial interest: the method of doubt, the cogito , clarity and distinctness as criteria of truth, the natural light, the circularity of the Meditations , proofs of God’s existence, etc. Moreover, under the term Cartesianism his Censura Philosophiae Cartesianae (1689) attacks both Descar…

  • The Condemnations of Cartesian Natural Philosophy Under Louis XIV (1661–91)

    Sophie Roux, Steven Nadler et al.•CHAPTER•Oxford Handbook of Descartes and…•2019

    The interdiction of the teaching of Descartes’s natural philosophy pronounced by Louis XIV in 1671 was followed by a wave of official condemnations. The first part of this chapter gathers together the facts that led some historians to speak of the persecution of Cartesianism. In the second part, it is argued that various causes explain these condemnations, first by relativizing the importance of the doctrinal question of the Eucharist, second by …

  • Descartes on the Metaphysics of the Material World

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2018•References: 21

    It is a matter of continuing scholarly dispute whether Descartes offers a metaphysics of the material world that is “monist” or “pluralist.” One passage that has become crucial to this debate is from the Synopsis of the Meditations, in which Descartes argues that since “body taken in general” is a substance, and since all substances are “by their nature incorruptible,” this sort of body is incorruptible as well. In this article I defend a plurali…

  • Causa sui and Created Truth in Descartes

    Tad M Schmaltz•CHAPTER•Ultimate Why Question : Why Is…•2017

  • The Problem of Universals in Early Modern Philosophy

    S Di Bella, Tad M Schmaltz•BOOK•Problem of Universals in Early…•2017

    The ancient topic of universals was central to scholastic philosophy, which raised the question of whether universals exist as Platonic forms, as instantiated Aristotelian forms, as concepts abstracted from singular things, or as words that have universal signification. It might be thought that this question lost its importance after the decline of scholasticism in the modern period. However, the fourteen contributions to this volume indicate tha…

  • Universals and Individuals in Malebranche’s Philosophy

    Stefano Di Bella, Mariangela Priarolo et al.•BOOK•Problem of Universals in Early…•2017

    In Malebranche’s work, universals are identified with God’s ideas, which are the same ideas by means of which human beings know the world. However, because Malebranche states, at least in his mature writings, that all ideas are universal, general, and infinite, the knowledge of particulars appears problematic. This chapter addresses this question by showing that a consideration of the medieval sources of Malebranche’s theory of knowledge—the visi…

  • Galileo and Descartes on Copernicanism and the cause of the tides

    Open Access•Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2015

  • Efficient Causation: A History

    Tad M Schmaltz•BOOK•Efficient causation•2014

    "This volume is a contribution to the Oxford Philosophical Concepts series, the main goal of which is to provide historical accounts of the development of central philosophical concepts. Among these concepts would seem to be that of efficient causation (or, today, simply causation). Causation is now commonly supposed to involve a succession that instantiates some law-like regularity. This understanding of causality has a history that includes var…

  • Malebranche on Natural and Free Loves

    Tad M Schmaltz•CHAPTER•Concept of Love in 17th and 18th…•2008

  • Descartes on Causation

    Tad M Schmaltz•BOOK•Descartes on Causation•2007

  • Cartesian causation: Body–body interaction, motion, and eternal truths

    Open Access•Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2003•Cited by: 3•References: 15

  • What Has Cartesianism to Do with Jansenism

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1999•Cited by: 2

    What Has Cartesianism To Do with Jansenism? Tad M. Schmaltz My title is modeled on the famous query of the third-century theologian, Tertullian: “What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?” Tertullian’s question asks what pagan Greek learning has to do with the theology of the early Church. By comparison my question asks what philosophical Cartesianism has to do with theological Jansenism, and more specifically what these movements had to do with each…

  • Malebranche's Theory of the Soul: A Cartesian Interpretation

    Fred Ablondi, Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1998

  • Descartes and Malebranche on Mind and Mind-Body Union

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1992

    I n a famous pair of letters sent in 1643 to Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia, Descartes responded to queries concerning interaction of human mind and its body when he noted that this sort of mind is united in a special way to such a body. Notoriously, recent commentators agree neither on whether mind-body interaction constitutes a problem for Descartes, nor on whether his remarks to Elisabeth concerning mind-body union even address this problem. Cr…

  • Platonism and Descartes’ View of Immutable Essences

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Archiv für Geschichte der…•1991

  • Cartesian causation: Body–body interaction, motion, and eternal truths

    Open Access•Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2003•Cited by: 3•References: 15

  • What Has Cartesianism to Do with Jansenism

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1999•Cited by: 2

    What Has Cartesianism To Do with Jansenism? Tad M. Schmaltz My title is modeled on the famous query of the third-century theologian, Tertullian: “What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?” Tertullian’s question asks what pagan Greek learning has to do with the theology of the early Church. By comparison my question asks what philosophical Cartesianism has to do with theological Jansenism, and more specifically what these movements had to do with each…

  • Platonism and Descartes’ View of Immutable Essences

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Archiv für Geschichte der…•1991

  • Descartes and Malebranche on Mind and Mind-Body Union

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1992

    I n a famous pair of letters sent in 1643 to Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia, Descartes responded to queries concerning interaction of human mind and its body when he noted that this sort of mind is united in a special way to such a body. Notoriously, recent commentators agree neither on whether mind-body interaction constitutes a problem for Descartes, nor on whether his remarks to Elisabeth concerning mind-body union even address this problem. Cr…

  • Malebranche's Theory of the Soul: A Cartesian Interpretation

    Fred Ablondi, Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1998

  • What Has Cartesianism to Do with Jansenism

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1999•Cited by: 2

    What Has Cartesianism To Do with Jansenism? Tad M. Schmaltz My title is modeled on the famous query of the third-century theologian, Tertullian: “What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?” Tertullian’s question asks what pagan Greek learning has to do with the theology of the early Church. By comparison my question asks what philosophical Cartesianism has to do with theological Jansenism, and more specifically what these movements had to do with each…

  • Cartesian causation: Body–body interaction, motion, and eternal truths

    Open Access•Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2003•Cited by: 3•References: 15

  • Descartes on Causation

    Tad M Schmaltz•BOOK•Descartes on Causation•2007

  • Malebranche on Natural and Free Loves

    Tad M Schmaltz•CHAPTER•Concept of Love in 17th and 18th…•2008

  • Efficient Causation: A History

    Tad M Schmaltz•BOOK•Efficient causation•2014

    "This volume is a contribution to the Oxford Philosophical Concepts series, the main goal of which is to provide historical accounts of the development of central philosophical concepts. Among these concepts would seem to be that of efficient causation (or, today, simply causation). Causation is now commonly supposed to involve a succession that instantiates some law-like regularity. This understanding of causality has a history that includes var…

  • Galileo and Descartes on Copernicanism and the cause of the tides

    Open Access•Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2015

  • Causa sui and Created Truth in Descartes

    Tad M Schmaltz•CHAPTER•Ultimate Why Question : Why Is…•2017

  • The Problem of Universals in Early Modern Philosophy

    S Di Bella, Tad M Schmaltz•BOOK•Problem of Universals in Early…•2017

    The ancient topic of universals was central to scholastic philosophy, which raised the question of whether universals exist as Platonic forms, as instantiated Aristotelian forms, as concepts abstracted from singular things, or as words that have universal signification. It might be thought that this question lost its importance after the decline of scholasticism in the modern period. However, the fourteen contributions to this volume indicate tha…

  • Universals and Individuals in Malebranche’s Philosophy

    Stefano Di Bella, Mariangela Priarolo et al.•BOOK•Problem of Universals in Early…•2017

    In Malebranche’s work, universals are identified with God’s ideas, which are the same ideas by means of which human beings know the world. However, because Malebranche states, at least in his mature writings, that all ideas are universal, general, and infinite, the knowledge of particulars appears problematic. This chapter addresses this question by showing that a consideration of the medieval sources of Malebranche’s theory of knowledge—the visi…

  • Descartes on the Metaphysics of the Material World

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2018•References: 21

    It is a matter of continuing scholarly dispute whether Descartes offers a metaphysics of the material world that is “monist” or “pluralist.” One passage that has become crucial to this debate is from the Synopsis of the Meditations, in which Descartes argues that since “body taken in general” is a substance, and since all substances are “by their nature incorruptible,” this sort of body is incorruptible as well. In this article I defend a plurali…

  • The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism

    Steven Nadler, Tad M Schmaltz et al.•BOOK•Oxford Handbook of Descartes and…•2019

    A collection of fifty essays on Descartes and his influence in the seventeenth century. The first section is devoted to various aspects of Descartes’s philosophy (biography, epistemology, metaphysics, natural philosophy (science), mathematics, philosophical theology, etc.). The second section is devoted to Descartes’s influence, especially Cartesians and the Cartesian movement, in France, the Netherlands, Italy, England and elsewhere. The third s…

  • Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism

    Delphine Antoine-Mahut, Steven Nadler et al.•BOOK•Oxford Handbook of Descartes and…•2019

    The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism comprises fifty specially written chapters on Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and Cartesianism, the dominant paradigm for philosophy and science in the seventeenth century, written by an international group of leading scholars of early modern philosophy. The first part focuses on the various aspects of Descartes's biography (including his background, intellectual contexts, writings, and correspondence)…

  • Pierre-Daniel Huet, Skeptic Critic of Cartesianism and Defender of Religion

    Thomas M Lennon, Steven Nadler et al.•CHAPTER•Oxford Handbook of Descartes and…•2019

    Pierre-Daniel Huet (1630–1721) was Cartesianism’s most implacable critic ever. And more than any other critic, he raised the Cartesian issues that have been of perennial interest: the method of doubt, the cogito , clarity and distinctness as criteria of truth, the natural light, the circularity of the Meditations , proofs of God’s existence, etc. Moreover, under the term Cartesianism his Censura Philosophiae Cartesianae (1689) attacks both Descar…

  • The Condemnations of Cartesian Natural Philosophy Under Louis XIV (1661–91)

    Sophie Roux, Steven Nadler et al.•CHAPTER•Oxford Handbook of Descartes and…•2019

    The interdiction of the teaching of Descartes’s natural philosophy pronounced by Louis XIV in 1671 was followed by a wave of official condemnations. The first part of this chapter gathers together the facts that led some historians to speak of the persecution of Cartesianism. In the second part, it is argued that various causes explain these condemnations, first by relativizing the importance of the doctrinal question of the Eucharist, second by …

  • Gueroult on Spinoza and the Ethics

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Revue internationale de philosophie•2020

    Cet article concerne l’application de la méthode « dianoématique », ou « étude des doctrines », dans le commentaire important de Martial Gueroult aux deux premières parties de l’ Éthique de Spinoza. Gueroult met l’accent sur deux affirmations distinctes dans les deux volumes de ce commentaire. La première affirmation, tirée du premier volume, est que Spinoza adopte une version du monisme dans la première partie de l’ Éthique selon laquelle Dieu, …

  • Gueroult on Spinoza and the Ethics

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Revue internationale de philosophie•2020

  • Introduction: Material Substance and Quantity, from Suárez to Leibniz

    Jean-Pascal Anfray, Jean‐Pascal Anfray et al.•ARTICLE•Vivarium•2020

  • Quantity and Extension in Suárez and Descartes

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•Vivarium•2020

    This paper compares the development of the notion of continuous quantity in the work of Francisco Suárez and René Descartes. The discussion begins with a consideration of Suárez’s rejection of the view – common to ‘realists’ such as Thomas Aquinas and ‘nominalists’ such as William of Ockham – that quantity is inseparable from the extension of material integral parts. Crucial here is Suárez’s view that quantified extension exhibits a kind of impen…

  • The indefinite in the Descartes-More correspondence

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•British Journal for the History…•2021

    In this article, I consider Descartes’ enigmatic claim that we must assert that the material world is indefinite rather than infinite. The focus here is on the discussion of this claim in Descartes’ late correspondence with More. One puzzle that emerges from this correspondence is that Descartes insists to More that we are not in a position to deny the indefinite universe has limits, while at the same time indicating that we conceive a contradict…

  • Descartes and the Ontology of Everyday Life

    Tad M Schmaltz•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2021

    Descartes offers a view of the material world that identifies matter with indefinitely divisible extension. Such a view also eliminates the various substantial forms that, for his Scholastic contemporaries, serve to distinguish the natural substances of our experience, the paradigmatic instances of which are living things. These contemporaries countered that this view presents the world as a barren desert landscape, devoid of the variety of every…

  • The Cartesian Brain: Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives

    Denis Kambouchner, Damien Lacroux et al.•BOOK•The Cartesian Brain•2024

    International audience

Philosophy (21 works) · Epistemology (18 works) · Historical Philosophy and Science (12 works) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (11 works) · History of Science and Medicine (8 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Historical and Literary Studies (5 works) · Metaphysics (5 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Cartesianism (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae