Blagovesta Tacheva
Biographic Data
| ID | 4607678 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Blagovesta Tacheva |
| GIVEN NAMES | Blagovesta |
| FAMILY NAME | Tacheva |
| SIGNATURE | TACHEVA B |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Leeds |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3283-1266 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Formative evaluation of a nutrition label education intervention using computer gamification to promote learning among school students
Objective: This study aimed to formatively evaluate a new nutrition label education intervention featuring the computer game Food Decisions with school students to assess feasibility, fun, perceptions and potential for impact on mediators of making healthier food choices. Methods: Noncontrolled, pre–post intervention study with a class of 30 Year-10 pupils conducted in Yorkshire, England. Data collected orally and by questionnaire to evaluate stu…
WHO’s pandemic response recommendations after Covid-19
Objectives: This article examines how the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendations and guidelines on public health and social measures (PHSM) have changed since COVID-19. Doing so allows insights on what lessons WHO has learned from the COVID-19 response. Methods: The article analyses six recent WHO publications detailing recommendations on PHSM and compares them against three pre-COVID-19 WHO documents. The analysis also assesses the ev…
The devil’s in the detail
This is the first published study examining whether, and to what degree, innovative financing could effectively support the financing needs of the global pandemic prevention, preparedness and response (PPPR) agenda. Background: What is already known? In the context of global health, innovative financing encompasses a range of financial instruments that supplement international development assistance and other traditional sources of financing, wit…
Should Eminence Outweigh Evidence? The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board's Report on Pandemic Preparedness
The Global Pandemic Monitoring Board (GPMB) is a group of eminent individuals publishing reports calling for increased emphasis on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response (PPPR). They advocate for the World Health Organization's (WHO) PPPR preferred approach and its attendant financial requests. Though claiming independence, GPMB is co‐convened by WHO and the World Bank. The GPMB report of January 2025 displays a selective approach in whi…
Urgent pandemic messaging of WHO , World Bank, and G20 is inconsistent with their evidence base
When international agencies make claims of an “existential threat” to humanity and advocate for urgent action from countries, it should be a safe assumption that they are consistent with their own data. However, a review of the data and evidentiary citations underlying the claims of the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Bank, and the Group of Twenty (G20) reveals a troubling picture in which the stated urgency and burden of infectious di…
The Responsibility for Peace (R4P)
This article introduces a new conceptualisation of the relationship between global distributive justice, development, and the study of peace, which we label the Responsibility for Peace (R4P). In doing so, the article examines the notion of positive peace within peace studies, its relation to arguments within global distributive justice, and to what degree this important relationship is recognised in the primary international framework to prevent…
Challenges in international health financing and implications for the new pandemic fund
BACKGROUND: The failures of the international COVID-19 response highlighted key gaps in pandemic preparedness and response (PPR). The G20 and WHO have called for additional funding of $10.5 billion per year to adequately strengthen the global PPR architecture. In response to these calls, in 2022 the World Bank announced the launch of a new Financial Intermediary Fund (The Pandemic Fund) to catalyse this additional funding. However, there is consi…
Global constitutionalism and the responsibility to protect
There is recent scholarship suggesting that the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) has now emerged as a master concept in relation to responding to mass atrocity crimes and that the R2P can further be seen as representative of an emerging global constitutional norm. In critical response, this article provides the first attempt to systematically investigate R2P’s relationship with global constitutionalisation as well as to explore its wider implicati…
No prominent works on this page.
Global constitutionalism and the responsibility to protect
There is recent scholarship suggesting that the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) has now emerged as a master concept in relation to responding to mass atrocity crimes and that the R2P can further be seen as representative of an emerging global constitutional norm. In critical response, this article provides the first attempt to systematically investigate R2P’s relationship with global constitutionalisation as well as to explore its wider implicati…
Challenges in international health financing and implications for the new pandemic fund
BACKGROUND: The failures of the international COVID-19 response highlighted key gaps in pandemic preparedness and response (PPR). The G20 and WHO have called for additional funding of $10.5 billion per year to adequately strengthen the global PPR architecture. In response to these calls, in 2022 the World Bank announced the launch of a new Financial Intermediary Fund (The Pandemic Fund) to catalyse this additional funding. However, there is consi…
Urgent pandemic messaging of WHO , World Bank, and G20 is inconsistent with their evidence base
When international agencies make claims of an “existential threat” to humanity and advocate for urgent action from countries, it should be a safe assumption that they are consistent with their own data. However, a review of the data and evidentiary citations underlying the claims of the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Bank, and the Group of Twenty (G20) reveals a troubling picture in which the stated urgency and burden of infectious di…
The Responsibility for Peace (R4P)
This article introduces a new conceptualisation of the relationship between global distributive justice, development, and the study of peace, which we label the Responsibility for Peace (R4P). In doing so, the article examines the notion of positive peace within peace studies, its relation to arguments within global distributive justice, and to what degree this important relationship is recognised in the primary international framework to prevent…
WHO’s pandemic response recommendations after Covid-19
Objectives: This article examines how the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendations and guidelines on public health and social measures (PHSM) have changed since COVID-19. Doing so allows insights on what lessons WHO has learned from the COVID-19 response. Methods: The article analyses six recent WHO publications detailing recommendations on PHSM and compares them against three pre-COVID-19 WHO documents. The analysis also assesses the ev…
The devil’s in the detail
This is the first published study examining whether, and to what degree, innovative financing could effectively support the financing needs of the global pandemic prevention, preparedness and response (PPPR) agenda. Background: What is already known? In the context of global health, innovative financing encompasses a range of financial instruments that supplement international development assistance and other traditional sources of financing, wit…
Should Eminence Outweigh Evidence? The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board's Report on Pandemic Preparedness
The Global Pandemic Monitoring Board (GPMB) is a group of eminent individuals publishing reports calling for increased emphasis on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response (PPPR). They advocate for the World Health Organization's (WHO) PPPR preferred approach and its attendant financial requests. Though claiming independence, GPMB is co‐convened by WHO and the World Bank. The GPMB report of January 2025 displays a selective approach in whi…
Formative evaluation of a nutrition label education intervention using computer gamification to promote learning among school students
Objective: This study aimed to formatively evaluate a new nutrition label education intervention featuring the computer game Food Decisions with school students to assess feasibility, fun, perceptions and potential for impact on mediators of making healthier food choices. Methods: Noncontrolled, pre–post intervention study with a class of 30 Year-10 pupils conducted in Yorkshire, England. Data collected orally and by questionnaire to evaluate stu…
Business (4 works) · Pandemic (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (4 works) · Law (3 works) · Medicine (3 works) · Preparedness (3 works) · COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 works) · Economic growth (2 works) · Economics (2 works)