Catherine Saunders
Biographic Data
| ID | 4620839 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Catherine Saunders |
| GIVEN NAMES | Catherine |
| FAMILY NAME | Saunders |
| SIGNATURE | SAUNDERS C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0819-6610 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Provider and Staff Perspectives on Screening and Referral for Social Determinants of Health During Perinatal Care: Implications Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Despite unanimous support for addressing SDOHs within maternity care, participants perceived persistent challenges to effectively implementing SDOH screening and providing adequate referrals. They recommended that screening for SDOHs in vulnerable populations be accompanied by clear guidance and leadership, equitable distribution of resources and staff time between implementing clinics, and continuous quality improvement efforts
Clinician-Spoken Plain Language in Health Care Encounters: A Qualitative Analysis to Assess Measurable Elements
The Confident study protocol: A randomized controlled trial comparing two methods to increase long-term care worker confidence in the Covid-19 vaccines
NCT05168800 at ClinicalTrials.gov, registered December 23, 2021
Processes for evidence summarization for patient decision aids: A Delphi consensus study
BACKGROUND: Patient decision aids (PDAs) should provide evidence-based information so patients can make informed decisions. Yet, PDA developers do not have an agreed-upon process to select, synthesize and present evidence in PDAs. OBJECTIVE: To reach the consensus on an evidence summarization process for PDAs. DESIGN: A two-round modified Delphi survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A group of international experts in PDA development invited develope…
Evaluating interventions that prevent or counter violent extremism: A practical guide
This document provides an overview of data collection methods and evaluation designs suitable for evaluating interventions and programmes designed to prevent and counter violent extremism and radicalisation. This document also provides a comprehensive discussion on ethical considerations in PCVE evaluation more broadly, as well as in the application of specific evaluation methods.
No prominent works on this page.
Evaluating interventions that prevent or counter violent extremism: A practical guide
This document provides an overview of data collection methods and evaluation designs suitable for evaluating interventions and programmes designed to prevent and counter violent extremism and radicalisation. This document also provides a comprehensive discussion on ethical considerations in PCVE evaluation more broadly, as well as in the application of specific evaluation methods.
Processes for evidence summarization for patient decision aids: A Delphi consensus study
BACKGROUND: Patient decision aids (PDAs) should provide evidence-based information so patients can make informed decisions. Yet, PDA developers do not have an agreed-upon process to select, synthesize and present evidence in PDAs. OBJECTIVE: To reach the consensus on an evidence summarization process for PDAs. DESIGN: A two-round modified Delphi survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A group of international experts in PDA development invited develope…
The Confident study protocol: A randomized controlled trial comparing two methods to increase long-term care worker confidence in the Covid-19 vaccines
NCT05168800 at ClinicalTrials.gov, registered December 23, 2021
Clinician-Spoken Plain Language in Health Care Encounters: A Qualitative Analysis to Assess Measurable Elements
Provider and Staff Perspectives on Screening and Referral for Social Determinants of Health During Perinatal Care: Implications Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Despite unanimous support for addressing SDOHs within maternity care, participants perceived persistent challenges to effectively implementing SDOH screening and providing adequate referrals. They recommended that screening for SDOHs in vulnerable populations be accompanied by clear guidance and leadership, equitable distribution of resources and staff time between implementing clinics, and continuous quality improvement efforts
Medicine (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Health care (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Alternative medicine (2 works) · Family medicine (2 works) · Medical education (2 works) · MEDLINE (2 works) · Nursing (2 works) · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 works)