Erman Sözüdoğru
Biographic Data
| ID | 4638850 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Erman Sözüdoğru |
| GIVEN NAMES | Erman |
| FAMILY NAME | Sözüdoğru |
| SIGNATURE | SÖZÜDOĞRU E |
| AFFILIATIONS | Department of Science and Technology |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2923-5052 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Interconnected Health-Environmental Challenges
Increased pollution, obesity rates, or the COVID-19 pandemic are only a few examples of the numerous intertwined health-environmental challenges humanity is facing. The severity of these challenges strongly suggests that research in these fields is failing to generate evidence to support decisions and actions that can help address, mitigate or adapt to them. In this article, we look into some of the underlying assumptions underpinning mainstream …
Pragmatic pluralism and problem framing
In this paper I focus on the benefits of scientific pluralism in practice. My main motivation is to investigate how do these benefits play out in practice, and how do different systems of knowledge come together to address particular questions? One might accept the epistemic benefits of plurality, yet still deem it undesirable for pragmatic reasons. My argument responds to this objection, which assumes that pragmatic demands can supersede the epi…
No prominent works on this page.
Interconnected Health-Environmental Challenges
Increased pollution, obesity rates, or the COVID-19 pandemic are only a few examples of the numerous intertwined health-environmental challenges humanity is facing. The severity of these challenges strongly suggests that research in these fields is failing to generate evidence to support decisions and actions that can help address, mitigate or adapt to them. In this article, we look into some of the underlying assumptions underpinning mainstream …
Pragmatic pluralism and problem framing
In this paper I focus on the benefits of scientific pluralism in practice. My main motivation is to investigate how do these benefits play out in practice, and how do different systems of knowledge come together to address particular questions? One might accept the epistemic benefits of plurality, yet still deem it undesirable for pragmatic reasons. My argument responds to this objection, which assumes that pragmatic demands can supersede the epi…
Argument (complex analysis) (1 work) · Capitalism (1 work) · Embodied and Extended Cognition (1 work) · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (1 work) · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (1 work) · Focus (optics) (1 work) · Framing (construction) (1 work) · Implosion (1 work) · Philosophy and History of Science (1 work) · Pluralism (philosophy) (1 work)