Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jarrod Kelly

Biographic Data

ID4779502
NAMEJarrod Kelly
GIVEN NAMESJarrod
FAMILY NAMEKelly
SIGNATUREKELLY J
AFFILIATIONSNorth Carolina Wesleyan College
ORCID0000-0001-7145-9490
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS11
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX2
  • Party over preference? Strategic primary voting in the age of outsiders

    Open Access•Jarrod Kelly, Eric Loepp et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science Quarterly•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 19

    Objective Some primary voters cast their ballot for a candidate they do not most prefer in hopes that doing so will increase their party's chances of winning the general election. However, the emergence of party “outsider” candidates challenges prevailing assumptions about the persuasive pull of electability arguments on voter decision making. In this project, we analyze whether and when supporters of “outsider” candidates resolve strategic dilem…

  • Distinction without a difference? An assessment of MTurk Worker types

    Open Access•Eric D Loepp, Jarrod Kelly•ARTICLE•Research & Politics•2020•Cited by: 4•References: 4

    Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform is a popular tool for scholars seeking a reasonably representative population to recruit subjects for academic research that is cheaper than contract work via survey research firms. Numerous scholarly inquiries affirm that the MTurk pool is at least as representative as college student samples; however, questions about the validity of MTurk data persist. Amazon classifies all MTurk Workers into two types:…

  • The change we believe in

    Open Access•Jarrod T Kelly, Jarrod Kelly et al.•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2018•Cited by: 3•References: 47

  • Evaluating the Effects of Multiple Opinion Rationales on Supreme Court Legitimacy

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau, Jarrod T Kelly et al.•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2017•Cited by: 2•References: 33

    The literature on the U.S. Supreme Court has paid substantial attention to the perceived legitimacy of the Court’s decisions. However, much less attention has been paid to the perceived legitimacy of the reasons the Court provides for its opinions. We design two experiments to understand how the public perceives opinion content. Unlike prior studies, we take it as a given that the Court uses legal reasons in its decisions. This offers us a baseli…

  • Distinction without a difference? An assessment of MTurk Worker types

    Open Access•Eric D Loepp, Jarrod Kelly•ARTICLE•Research & Politics•2020•Cited by: 4•References: 4

    Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform is a popular tool for scholars seeking a reasonably representative population to recruit subjects for academic research that is cheaper than contract work via survey research firms. Numerous scholarly inquiries affirm that the MTurk pool is at least as representative as college student samples; however, questions about the validity of MTurk data persist. Amazon classifies all MTurk Workers into two types:…

  • The change we believe in

    Open Access•Jarrod T Kelly, Jarrod Kelly et al.•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2018•Cited by: 3•References: 47

  • Party over preference? Strategic primary voting in the age of outsiders

    Open Access•Jarrod Kelly, Eric Loepp et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science Quarterly•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 19

    Objective Some primary voters cast their ballot for a candidate they do not most prefer in hopes that doing so will increase their party's chances of winning the general election. However, the emergence of party “outsider” candidates challenges prevailing assumptions about the persuasive pull of electability arguments on voter decision making. In this project, we analyze whether and when supporters of “outsider” candidates resolve strategic dilem…

  • Evaluating the Effects of Multiple Opinion Rationales on Supreme Court Legitimacy

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau, Jarrod T Kelly et al.•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2017•Cited by: 2•References: 33

    The literature on the U.S. Supreme Court has paid substantial attention to the perceived legitimacy of the Court’s decisions. However, much less attention has been paid to the perceived legitimacy of the reasons the Court provides for its opinions. We design two experiments to understand how the public perceives opinion content. Unlike prior studies, we take it as a given that the Court uses legal reasons in its decisions. This offers us a baseli…

  • Evaluating the Effects of Multiple Opinion Rationales on Supreme Court Legitimacy

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau, Jarrod T Kelly et al.•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2017•Cited by: 2•References: 33

    The literature on the U.S. Supreme Court has paid substantial attention to the perceived legitimacy of the Court’s decisions. However, much less attention has been paid to the perceived legitimacy of the reasons the Court provides for its opinions. We design two experiments to understand how the public perceives opinion content. Unlike prior studies, we take it as a given that the Court uses legal reasons in its decisions. This offers us a baseli…

  • The change we believe in

    Open Access•Jarrod T Kelly, Jarrod Kelly et al.•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2018•Cited by: 3•References: 47

  • Distinction without a difference? An assessment of MTurk Worker types

    Open Access•Eric D Loepp, Jarrod Kelly•ARTICLE•Research & Politics•2020•Cited by: 4•References: 4

    Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform is a popular tool for scholars seeking a reasonably representative population to recruit subjects for academic research that is cheaper than contract work via survey research firms. Numerous scholarly inquiries affirm that the MTurk pool is at least as representative as college student samples; however, questions about the validity of MTurk data persist. Amazon classifies all MTurk Workers into two types:…

  • Party over preference? Strategic primary voting in the age of outsiders

    Open Access•Jarrod Kelly, Eric Loepp et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science Quarterly•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 19

    Objective Some primary voters cast their ballot for a candidate they do not most prefer in hopes that doing so will increase their party's chances of winning the general election. However, the emergence of party “outsider” candidates challenges prevailing assumptions about the persuasive pull of electability arguments on voter decision making. In this project, we analyze whether and when supporters of “outsider” candidates resolve strategic dilem…

Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Demography (2 works) · Demography (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Population (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae