Satishchandra Purushottam Kale
Biographic Data
| ID | 4789685 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Satishchandra Purushottam Kale |
| GIVEN NAMES | Satishchandra Purushottam |
| FAMILY NAME | Kale |
| SIGNATURE | KALE S P |
| AFFILIATIONS | NIMS University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v Union of India
The judgment of the Supreme Court of India in Vijay Madanlal v Union of India follows a long history of judicial exceptionalism in dealing with ‘economic offences’, and in doing so, further dilutes the safeguards that apply to ordinary criminal investigations under the Constitution of India 1950, the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act 1872. This article argues that the distinctions between ‘investigation’ and ‘inquiry’, …
The Role of Contributory Negligence in Alleged Cases of Medical Negligence – A Review
Contributory negligence is a key principle in medical negligence law, serving as a contributory defence that can partially shift the blame of the harm inflicted on the medical practitioner to the patient . As in any other common law country, contributory negligence is a well-known legal principle in India as well as several other countries, in that the measure of negligence can be affected by the complainant’s own act construed as negligence for …
Medical Knowledge of the Judiciary and the Importance of the Medical Expert Witness for Assisting Judicial Appreciation of Medico-Legal Evidence
This article focuses on assessment of medical knowledge among judiciary members, how some degree of medical knowledge assists in decision making among members of the judiciary. Further, this article discusses the ever-expanding role and scope of the Expert witness including the selection of such experts underlining the significance of checks to achieve the confidence in the quality of testimonies and neutrality of the witness. Furthermore, the ch…
KATHLEEN Kete. Making Way for Genius
Kathleen Kete tells us that ambition was a serious problem in an era coming to grips with Enlightenment modernity. In what can be described as a cultural history of ambition in postrevolutionary France that engages with literary history, New Biography, and the new history of emotions, Kete examines how three early nineteenth-century authors—Germaine de Staël, Stendhal, and Georges Cuvier—grappled with the ethical dilemmas of personal success. The…
No prominent works on this page.
KATHLEEN Kete. Making Way for Genius
Kathleen Kete tells us that ambition was a serious problem in an era coming to grips with Enlightenment modernity. In what can be described as a cultural history of ambition in postrevolutionary France that engages with literary history, New Biography, and the new history of emotions, Kete examines how three early nineteenth-century authors—Germaine de Staël, Stendhal, and Georges Cuvier—grappled with the ethical dilemmas of personal success. The…
The Role of Contributory Negligence in Alleged Cases of Medical Negligence – A Review
Contributory negligence is a key principle in medical negligence law, serving as a contributory defence that can partially shift the blame of the harm inflicted on the medical practitioner to the patient . As in any other common law country, contributory negligence is a well-known legal principle in India as well as several other countries, in that the measure of negligence can be affected by the complainant’s own act construed as negligence for …
Medical Knowledge of the Judiciary and the Importance of the Medical Expert Witness for Assisting Judicial Appreciation of Medico-Legal Evidence
This article focuses on assessment of medical knowledge among judiciary members, how some degree of medical knowledge assists in decision making among members of the judiciary. Further, this article discusses the ever-expanding role and scope of the Expert witness including the selection of such experts underlining the significance of checks to achieve the confidence in the quality of testimonies and neutrality of the witness. Furthermore, the ch…
Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v Union of India
The judgment of the Supreme Court of India in Vijay Madanlal v Union of India follows a long history of judicial exceptionalism in dealing with ‘economic offences’, and in doing so, further dilutes the safeguards that apply to ordinary criminal investigations under the Constitution of India 1950, the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act 1872. This article argues that the distinctions between ‘investigation’ and ‘inquiry’, …
Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Art (1 work) · Art history (1 work) · Business (1 work) · Constitution (1 work) · Contributory negligence (1 work) · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (1 work)