Kenneth D Butterfield
Biographic Data
| ID | 4790263 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Kenneth D Butterfield |
| GIVEN NAMES | Kenneth D |
| FAMILY NAME | Butterfield |
| SIGNATURE | BUTTERFIELD K D |
| AFFILIATIONS | Washington State University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7317-5480 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 110 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 10 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1999 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Restoring dignity at work
Purpose The emerging moral repair literature suggests that, in the aftermath of workplace wrongdoing, reintegrating offenders reaps numerous benefits, not just for the offender, but for the organization. However, only a small number of empirical studies have investigated whether reintegration actually produces these outcomes, and little is known about how and why these relationships occur. The purpose of this paper is to examine how and when offe…
Self-repair in the Workplace
Remaking Custom
Journal Article Remaking Custom: Law and Identity in the Early American Republic Get access Remaking Custom: Law and Identity in the Early American Republic. By Ellen Holmes Pearson.(Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2011. xiv, 251 pp. $42.50, ISBN978-0-8139-3078-7.) Kevin Butterfield Kevin Butterfield University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma [email protected] Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar J…
Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs
Little is currently known about cheating among graduate business students. We collected data from more than 5,000 business (mostly MBA) and nonbusiness graduate students at 32 colleges and universities in the United States and Canada during the 2002–2003 and 2003–2004 academic years to test a series of hypotheses regarding the prevalence of graduate business student cheating and reasons why these students cheat. We found that graduate business st…
A Review of The Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature
Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences on Academic Integrity
Cheating in Academic Institutions
This article reviews 1 decade of research on cheating in academic institutions. This research demonstrates that cheating is prevalent and that some forms of cheating have increased dramatically in the last 30 years. This research also suggests that although both individual and contextual factors influence cheating, contextual factors, such as students' perceptions of peers' behavior, are the most powerful influence. In addition, an institution's …
Dishonesty in Academic Environments
(2001). Dishonesty in Academic Environments. The Journal of Higher Education: Vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 29-45
Moral Awareness in Business Organizations
Individuals' awarenessof moral issues is an important first step in the ethicaldecision-making process. Relying on research in social cognition andbusiness ethics, we hypothesized that moral awareness is influenced byissue-related factors (magnitude of consequences of the moral issueand issue framing in moral terms) and social contextrelated factors(competitive context and perceived social consensus that the issue isethically problematic). The hy…
Academic Integrity in Honor Code and Non-Honor Code Environments
Additional informationNotes on contributorsDonald L. McCabeDonald L. McCabe is professor of organization management on the Faculty of Management and associate provost for campus development, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Linda Klebe Trevino is professor of organizational behavior, Smeal College of Business Administration, The Pennsylvania State University; Kenneth D. Butterfield is assistant professor, Department of Management and …
Academic Integrity in Honor Code and Non-Honor Code Environments
Additional informationNotes on contributorsDonald L. McCabeDonald L. McCabe is professor of organization management on the Faculty of Management and associate provost for campus development, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Linda Klebe Trevino is professor of organizational behavior, Smeal College of Business Administration, The Pennsylvania State University; Kenneth D. Butterfield is assistant professor, Department of Management and …
Moral Awareness in Business Organizations
Individuals' awarenessof moral issues is an important first step in the ethicaldecision-making process. Relying on research in social cognition andbusiness ethics, we hypothesized that moral awareness is influenced byissue-related factors (magnitude of consequences of the moral issueand issue framing in moral terms) and social contextrelated factors(competitive context and perceived social consensus that the issue isethically problematic). The hy…
Dishonesty in Academic Environments
(2001). Dishonesty in Academic Environments. The Journal of Higher Education: Vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 29-45
Academic Integrity in Honor Code and Non-Honor Code Environments
Additional informationNotes on contributorsDonald L. McCabeDonald L. McCabe is professor of organization management on the Faculty of Management and associate provost for campus development, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Linda Klebe Trevino is professor of organizational behavior, Smeal College of Business Administration, The Pennsylvania State University; Kenneth D. Butterfield is assistant professor, Department of Management and …
Moral Awareness in Business Organizations
Individuals' awarenessof moral issues is an important first step in the ethicaldecision-making process. Relying on research in social cognition andbusiness ethics, we hypothesized that moral awareness is influenced byissue-related factors (magnitude of consequences of the moral issueand issue framing in moral terms) and social contextrelated factors(competitive context and perceived social consensus that the issue isethically problematic). The hy…
Cheating in Academic Institutions
This article reviews 1 decade of research on cheating in academic institutions. This research demonstrates that cheating is prevalent and that some forms of cheating have increased dramatically in the last 30 years. This research also suggests that although both individual and contextual factors influence cheating, contextual factors, such as students' perceptions of peers' behavior, are the most powerful influence. In addition, an institution's …
Dishonesty in Academic Environments
(2001). Dishonesty in Academic Environments. The Journal of Higher Education: Vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 29-45
Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences on Academic Integrity
A Review of The Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature
Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs
Little is currently known about cheating among graduate business students. We collected data from more than 5,000 business (mostly MBA) and nonbusiness graduate students at 32 colleges and universities in the United States and Canada during the 2002–2003 and 2003–2004 academic years to test a series of hypotheses regarding the prevalence of graduate business student cheating and reasons why these students cheat. We found that graduate business st…
Remaking Custom
Journal Article Remaking Custom: Law and Identity in the Early American Republic Get access Remaking Custom: Law and Identity in the Early American Republic. By Ellen Holmes Pearson.(Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2011. xiv, 251 pp. $42.50, ISBN978-0-8139-3078-7.) Kevin Butterfield Kevin Butterfield University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma [email protected] Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar J…
Self-repair in the Workplace
Restoring dignity at work
Purpose The emerging moral repair literature suggests that, in the aftermath of workplace wrongdoing, reintegrating offenders reaps numerous benefits, not just for the offender, but for the organization. However, only a small number of empirical studies have investigated whether reintegration actually produces these outcomes, and little is known about how and why these relationships occur. The purpose of this paper is to examine how and when offe…
Ethics in Business and Education (8 works) · Psychology (7 works) · Social Psychology (7 works) · Political science (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Academic integrity and plagiarism (5 works) · Academic Dishonesty (4 works) · Academic integrity (4 works) · Cheating (4 works) · Public relations (4 works)