Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Navnita Chadha Behera

Biographic Data

ID479209
NAMENavnita Chadha Behera
GIVEN NAMESNavnita Chadha
FAMILY NAMEBehera
SIGNATUREBEHERA N C
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Delhi
ORCID0000-0001-6975-3359
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS16
TOTAL CITATIONS117
AUTHOR COUNT15
EDITOR COUNT1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1996
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX5
  • The 'subaltern speak: Can We, the Experts, Listen

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Affairs•2023•Cited by: 1

    Knowledge production in peace and conflict research is marked by a disconnect between its 'expertise-driven' research inquiries and lived realities of people across the world. In focusing on what knowledge and whose knowledge counts as legitimate among the diverse stakeholders, the article locates the raison d'être of this gap in the epistemic erasures inflicted by imperial knowledge and its lasting legacies, especially that of privileging the pr…

  • Provincialising International Relations through a reading of dharma

    Open Access•Guy Shani, Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 17

    This article will attempt to ‘provincialise’ (Chakrabarty, 2000) the ‘secular cosmology’ of International Relations (IR) through an examination of the relational cosmology of dharma . We argue that IR is grounded in ‘secularised’ Judaeo-Christian assumptions concerning time, relations between self and other, order, and the sovereign state that set the epistemic limits of the discipline. These assumptions will be ‘provincialised’ through an engage…

  • Introduction to the Special Issue: Pluriversal relationality

    Open Access•Tamara Trownsell, Navnita Chadha Behera et al.•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•2022•Cited by: 9•References: 21

    Both relationality and separateness are aspects of our everyday lives. How we engage these phenomena hinges on the particular existential assumptions that we take for granted. Within the discipline of International Relations (IR), both relationality and separateness have informed how global politics is studied and practiced. How states and their relations are conceived has, for instance, varied by the distinct degrees of privilege given to separa…

  • Making amends: Towards an antiracist critical security studies and international relations

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera, Kristina Hinds et al.•ARTICLE•Security Dialogue•2021•Cited by: 5•References: 11

  • Globalization, deglobalization and knowledge production

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Affairs•2021•Cited by: 4

    Although globalization processes have brought the world closer through the exchange of knowledge, ideas and practices, advances in knowledge dissemination have not been mirrored by expansion in sites and modes of knowledge production. This article probes this disjuncture and asks how deglobalization might chart different pathways by delving into the intellectual history of the making of International Relations (IR). Focusing its gaze on the struc…

  • Forum on Pedagogy: The Introductory Course in International Relations: Regional Variations

    Open Access•Jamie Frueh, Paul F Diehl et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Perspectives•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 12

    This forum explores how societal contexts affect how instructors teach introductory undergraduate courses in international relations (IR), global politics, and international studies. Contributors teach at universities in China, Ecuador, India, Morocco, South Africa, the United Kingdom–Scotland, and the United States. Because instructors vary the structure, content, and pedagogical approaches in their courses (and perhaps most in their introductor…

  • Covid-19, Democracies, and (De)Colonialities

    Open Access•Marcos S Scauso, Garrett Fitzgerald et al.•ARTICLE•Democratic Theory•2020•Cited by: 5•References: 7

    Liberal democracies often include rights of participation, guarantees of protection, and policies that privilege model citizens within a bounded territory. Notwithstanding claims of universal equality for “humanity,” they achieve these goals by epistemically elevating certain traits of identity above “others,” sustaining colonial biases that continue to favor whoever is regarded more “human.” The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these fault line…

  • Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World

    Open Access•Tamara Trownsell, Arlene B Tickner et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Perspectives•2020•Cited by: 33•References: 29

    Difference, a central concern to the study of international relations (IR), has not had its ontological foundations adequately disrupted. This forum explores how existential assumptions rooted in relational logics provide a significantly distinct set of tools that drive us to re-orient how we perceive, interpret, and engage both similarity and difference. Taking their cues from cosmological commitments originating in the Andes, South Asia, East A…

  • Knowledge Production

    Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Studies Review•2016•Cited by: 3

    Debating the global character of the international relations (IR) discipline a century after its “birth,” in the aftermath of the First World War, and nearly forty years after its seminal characterization by Stanley Hoffman as an “American discipline” shows that the last word on this issue is yet to be written. Although there is a small, critical, and growing body of scholarship around the world that is engaged in a broad-based endeavor for expan…

  • The Security Problematique in South Asia: Alternative Conceptualizations

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera•CHAPTER•Globalization and Environmental…•2008

  • Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century

    Open Access•H Van Ginkel, J Dean et al.•BOOK•Globalization and Environmental…•2008•Cited by: 15

  • Re-imagining IR in India

    Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Relations of the…•2007•Cited by: 37•References: 14

    The poor conceptualization of Indian IR can be explained by local factors such as its disciplinary location and pedagogical issues but its mainly because Western IRT has acquired a Gramscian hegemony over the epistemological foundations of the disciplinary core of Indian IRT - termed as 'traditional IR' in this article. It discusses the 'disciplinary gate-keeping practices' of Western IRT and the intellectual dependency of Indian IRT, which does …

  • The Long Road Ahead: Engendering Conflict Analysis in South Asia

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•Indian Journal of Gender Studies•2004•References: 2

    The Beijing Plus Five forum as well as the Women Building Peace campaign spear- headed by International Alert have brought the issue of women in armed conflict to the centre stage. This discussion addresses the changing character of conflict and the nature of conflict studies in international relations and the question of gender therein. It outlines some broad conceptual milestones or recognisable and shared processes of engendering research in t…

  • Kashmir: A testing ground

    Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•South Asia Journal of South Asian…•2002•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    (2002). Kashmir: A testing ground. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies: Vol. 25, The BJP and Governance in India, pp. 343-364

  • Kashmir Conflict: Secessionist Movement, Mobilization and Political Institutions

    Reeta Chowdhari Tremblay, Navnita Chadha Behera et al.•ARTICLE•Pacific Affairs•2001

  • Perpetuating the divide: Political abuse of history in South Asia

    Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•Contemporary South Asia•1996

    (1996). Perpetuating the divide: Political abuse of history in South Asia. Contemporary South Asia: Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 191-205

  • Re-imagining IR in India

    Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Relations of the…•2007•Cited by: 37•References: 14

    The poor conceptualization of Indian IR can be explained by local factors such as its disciplinary location and pedagogical issues but its mainly because Western IRT has acquired a Gramscian hegemony over the epistemological foundations of the disciplinary core of Indian IRT - termed as 'traditional IR' in this article. It discusses the 'disciplinary gate-keeping practices' of Western IRT and the intellectual dependency of Indian IRT, which does …

  • Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World

    Open Access•Tamara Trownsell, Arlene B Tickner et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Perspectives•2020•Cited by: 33•References: 29

    Difference, a central concern to the study of international relations (IR), has not had its ontological foundations adequately disrupted. This forum explores how existential assumptions rooted in relational logics provide a significantly distinct set of tools that drive us to re-orient how we perceive, interpret, and engage both similarity and difference. Taking their cues from cosmological commitments originating in the Andes, South Asia, East A…

  • Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century

    Open Access•H Van Ginkel, J Dean et al.•BOOK•Globalization and Environmental…•2008•Cited by: 15

  • Introduction to the Special Issue: Pluriversal relationality

    Open Access•Tamara Trownsell, Navnita Chadha Behera et al.•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•2022•Cited by: 9•References: 21

    Both relationality and separateness are aspects of our everyday lives. How we engage these phenomena hinges on the particular existential assumptions that we take for granted. Within the discipline of International Relations (IR), both relationality and separateness have informed how global politics is studied and practiced. How states and their relations are conceived has, for instance, varied by the distinct degrees of privilege given to separa…

  • Making amends: Towards an antiracist critical security studies and international relations

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera, Kristina Hinds et al.•ARTICLE•Security Dialogue•2021•Cited by: 5•References: 11

  • Covid-19, Democracies, and (De)Colonialities

    Open Access•Marcos S Scauso, Garrett Fitzgerald et al.•ARTICLE•Democratic Theory•2020•Cited by: 5•References: 7

    Liberal democracies often include rights of participation, guarantees of protection, and policies that privilege model citizens within a bounded territory. Notwithstanding claims of universal equality for “humanity,” they achieve these goals by epistemically elevating certain traits of identity above “others,” sustaining colonial biases that continue to favor whoever is regarded more “human.” The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these fault line…

  • Globalization, deglobalization and knowledge production

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Affairs•2021•Cited by: 4

    Although globalization processes have brought the world closer through the exchange of knowledge, ideas and practices, advances in knowledge dissemination have not been mirrored by expansion in sites and modes of knowledge production. This article probes this disjuncture and asks how deglobalization might chart different pathways by delving into the intellectual history of the making of International Relations (IR). Focusing its gaze on the struc…

  • Knowledge Production

    Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Studies Review•2016•Cited by: 3

    Debating the global character of the international relations (IR) discipline a century after its “birth,” in the aftermath of the First World War, and nearly forty years after its seminal characterization by Stanley Hoffman as an “American discipline” shows that the last word on this issue is yet to be written. Although there is a small, critical, and growing body of scholarship around the world that is engaged in a broad-based endeavor for expan…

  • Provincialising International Relations through a reading of dharma

    Open Access•Guy Shani, Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 17

    This article will attempt to ‘provincialise’ (Chakrabarty, 2000) the ‘secular cosmology’ of International Relations (IR) through an examination of the relational cosmology of dharma . We argue that IR is grounded in ‘secularised’ Judaeo-Christian assumptions concerning time, relations between self and other, order, and the sovereign state that set the epistemic limits of the discipline. These assumptions will be ‘provincialised’ through an engage…

  • Forum on Pedagogy: The Introductory Course in International Relations: Regional Variations

    Open Access•Jamie Frueh, Paul F Diehl et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Perspectives•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 12

    This forum explores how societal contexts affect how instructors teach introductory undergraduate courses in international relations (IR), global politics, and international studies. Contributors teach at universities in China, Ecuador, India, Morocco, South Africa, the United Kingdom–Scotland, and the United States. Because instructors vary the structure, content, and pedagogical approaches in their courses (and perhaps most in their introductor…

  • The 'subaltern speak: Can We, the Experts, Listen

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Affairs•2023•Cited by: 1

    Knowledge production in peace and conflict research is marked by a disconnect between its 'expertise-driven' research inquiries and lived realities of people across the world. In focusing on what knowledge and whose knowledge counts as legitimate among the diverse stakeholders, the article locates the raison d'être of this gap in the epistemic erasures inflicted by imperial knowledge and its lasting legacies, especially that of privileging the pr…

  • Kashmir: A testing ground

    Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•South Asia Journal of South Asian…•2002•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    (2002). Kashmir: A testing ground. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies: Vol. 25, The BJP and Governance in India, pp. 343-364

  • Perpetuating the divide: Political abuse of history in South Asia

    Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•Contemporary South Asia•1996

    (1996). Perpetuating the divide: Political abuse of history in South Asia. Contemporary South Asia: Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 191-205

  • Kashmir Conflict: Secessionist Movement, Mobilization and Political Institutions

    Reeta Chowdhari Tremblay, Navnita Chadha Behera et al.•ARTICLE•Pacific Affairs•2001

  • Kashmir: A testing ground

    Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•South Asia Journal of South Asian…•2002•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    (2002). Kashmir: A testing ground. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies: Vol. 25, The BJP and Governance in India, pp. 343-364

  • The Long Road Ahead: Engendering Conflict Analysis in South Asia

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•Indian Journal of Gender Studies•2004•References: 2

    The Beijing Plus Five forum as well as the Women Building Peace campaign spear- headed by International Alert have brought the issue of women in armed conflict to the centre stage. This discussion addresses the changing character of conflict and the nature of conflict studies in international relations and the question of gender therein. It outlines some broad conceptual milestones or recognisable and shared processes of engendering research in t…

  • Re-imagining IR in India

    Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Relations of the…•2007•Cited by: 37•References: 14

    The poor conceptualization of Indian IR can be explained by local factors such as its disciplinary location and pedagogical issues but its mainly because Western IRT has acquired a Gramscian hegemony over the epistemological foundations of the disciplinary core of Indian IRT - termed as 'traditional IR' in this article. It discusses the 'disciplinary gate-keeping practices' of Western IRT and the intellectual dependency of Indian IRT, which does …

  • The Security Problematique in South Asia: Alternative Conceptualizations

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera•CHAPTER•Globalization and Environmental…•2008

  • Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century

    Open Access•H Van Ginkel, J Dean et al.•BOOK•Globalization and Environmental…•2008•Cited by: 15

  • Knowledge Production

    Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Studies Review•2016•Cited by: 3

    Debating the global character of the international relations (IR) discipline a century after its “birth,” in the aftermath of the First World War, and nearly forty years after its seminal characterization by Stanley Hoffman as an “American discipline” shows that the last word on this issue is yet to be written. Although there is a small, critical, and growing body of scholarship around the world that is engaged in a broad-based endeavor for expan…

  • Forum on Pedagogy: The Introductory Course in International Relations: Regional Variations

    Open Access•Jamie Frueh, Paul F Diehl et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Perspectives•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 12

    This forum explores how societal contexts affect how instructors teach introductory undergraduate courses in international relations (IR), global politics, and international studies. Contributors teach at universities in China, Ecuador, India, Morocco, South Africa, the United Kingdom–Scotland, and the United States. Because instructors vary the structure, content, and pedagogical approaches in their courses (and perhaps most in their introductor…

  • Covid-19, Democracies, and (De)Colonialities

    Open Access•Marcos S Scauso, Garrett Fitzgerald et al.•ARTICLE•Democratic Theory•2020•Cited by: 5•References: 7

    Liberal democracies often include rights of participation, guarantees of protection, and policies that privilege model citizens within a bounded territory. Notwithstanding claims of universal equality for “humanity,” they achieve these goals by epistemically elevating certain traits of identity above “others,” sustaining colonial biases that continue to favor whoever is regarded more “human.” The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these fault line…

  • Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World

    Open Access•Tamara Trownsell, Arlene B Tickner et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Perspectives•2020•Cited by: 33•References: 29

    Difference, a central concern to the study of international relations (IR), has not had its ontological foundations adequately disrupted. This forum explores how existential assumptions rooted in relational logics provide a significantly distinct set of tools that drive us to re-orient how we perceive, interpret, and engage both similarity and difference. Taking their cues from cosmological commitments originating in the Andes, South Asia, East A…

  • Making amends: Towards an antiracist critical security studies and international relations

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera, Kristina Hinds et al.•ARTICLE•Security Dialogue•2021•Cited by: 5•References: 11

  • Globalization, deglobalization and knowledge production

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Affairs•2021•Cited by: 4

    Although globalization processes have brought the world closer through the exchange of knowledge, ideas and practices, advances in knowledge dissemination have not been mirrored by expansion in sites and modes of knowledge production. This article probes this disjuncture and asks how deglobalization might chart different pathways by delving into the intellectual history of the making of International Relations (IR). Focusing its gaze on the struc…

  • Provincialising International Relations through a reading of dharma

    Open Access•Guy Shani, Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 17

    This article will attempt to ‘provincialise’ (Chakrabarty, 2000) the ‘secular cosmology’ of International Relations (IR) through an examination of the relational cosmology of dharma . We argue that IR is grounded in ‘secularised’ Judaeo-Christian assumptions concerning time, relations between self and other, order, and the sovereign state that set the epistemic limits of the discipline. These assumptions will be ‘provincialised’ through an engage…

  • Introduction to the Special Issue: Pluriversal relationality

    Open Access•Tamara Trownsell, Navnita Chadha Behera et al.•ARTICLE•Review of International Studies•2022•Cited by: 9•References: 21

    Both relationality and separateness are aspects of our everyday lives. How we engage these phenomena hinges on the particular existential assumptions that we take for granted. Within the discipline of International Relations (IR), both relationality and separateness have informed how global politics is studied and practiced. How states and their relations are conceived has, for instance, varied by the distinct degrees of privilege given to separa…

  • The 'subaltern speak: Can We, the Experts, Listen

    Open Access•Navnita Chadha Behera•ARTICLE•International Affairs•2023•Cited by: 1

    Knowledge production in peace and conflict research is marked by a disconnect between its 'expertise-driven' research inquiries and lived realities of people across the world. In focusing on what knowledge and whose knowledge counts as legitimate among the diverse stakeholders, the article locates the raison d'être of this gap in the epistemic erasures inflicted by imperial knowledge and its lasting legacies, especially that of privileging the pr…

Political science (15 works) · Sociology (13 works) · Law (11 works) · Politics (10 works) · Law (8 works) · Epistemology (7 works) · South Asian Studies and Conflicts (7 works) · International relations (6 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Peacebuilding and International Security (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae