Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ben Hoen

Biographic Data

ID4794661
NAMEBen Hoen
GIVEN NAMESBen
FAMILY NAMEHoen
SIGNATUREBEN HOEN
AFFILIATIONSLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
ORCID0000-0002-9512-5572
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS9
TOTAL CITATIONS108
AUTHOR COUNT9
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX4
  • Uplifting winds

    Open Access•Ben Hoen, Eric Brunner et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2025•References: 8

    A primary concern of stakeholders when considering a new wind project is the potential negative effects wind turbines may have on home values. Yet, what has been surprisingly overlooked in the literature and general discourse around wind energy is that the well-researched positive economic development and fiscal and amenity benefits of wind energy (e.g., increased tax base, tax revenue, better public services and employment gains) might positivel…

  • Missing the mark

    Open Access•Douglas L Bessette, Joseph Rand et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 17

  • Under-capacitated and over-powered? Rural austerity and asymmetrical negotiating relationships in US wind energy development

    Open Access•Salma Elmallah, Roberta S Nilson et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Rural Studies•2025•References: 46

    Though rural local governments are central actors in renewable energy development, local governments in the United States (US) remain systematically under-funded. This paper considers what the manifestations of austerity in local governments broadly and rural localities specifically mean for renewable energy development and for energy transitions. Drawing on a survey of 262 elected county officials with experience with wind energy in eight US sta…

  • Halfway up the ladder

    Open Access•Roberta S Nilson, Joseph Rand et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2024•Cited by: 5•References: 18

    Community engagement is a key pathway for incorporating social considerations into the development of utility-scale renewable energy facilities. Prior literature recommends meaningful, early community engagement to both improve siting outcomes and empower the public to participate in decision-making, but there is no recent nor comprehensive understanding of industry experiences with engagement. This study provides a critical contribution by revea…

  • What to expect when you're expecting engagement

    Open Access•Karl Hoesch, Sarah Mills et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2024•Cited by: 11•References: 8

    Community engagement in the planning process to build large-scale solar (LSS) projects can win local support and advance procedural justice. However, an understanding of community engagement in current LSS development is lacking. Using responses from a U.S. nationwide survey (n = 979) of residential neighbors living within 3 miles (4.8 km) of completed LSS projects (i.e. “solar neighbors”) and project details from the U.S. Large-Scale Solar Photo…

  • Good fences make good neighbors

    Open Access•Douglas L Bessette, Ben Hoen et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2023•Cited by: 6•References: 28

    In order to meet decarbonization goals, the number of large-scale solar (LSS) facilities in the US is expected to increase considerably. The advantages of LSS over fossil-fueled power generation are numerous and well documented. However, residents living nearby proposed and existing LSS sites have voiced a number of concerns about LSS, including its possible impacts to farmland and agricultural production, biodiversity, stormwater runoff, home an…

  • In the shadow of wind energy

    Open Access•Ryan Haac, Ryan Darlow et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2022•References: 3

    The moving shadows caused by wind turbines, referred to as “shadow flicker” (“SF”), are known to generate annoyance in a subset of the exposed population. However, the relationship between the level of modeled SF exposure and the population's perceived SF and SF annoyance is poorly understood. Improved understanding of SF exposure impacts could provide a basis for exposure thresholds and, in turn, potentially improve community acceptance of and e…

  • Reconsidering barriers to wind power projects

    Open Access•Jeremy Firestone, Ben Hoen et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Environmental Policy &…•2018

    In 2016, we undertook a nationally representative wind power perceptions survey of individuals living within 8 km of over 600 projects in the United States, generating 1705 telephone, web, and mail responses. We sought information on a variety of topics, including procedural fairness and its relationship to project attitude, the foci of the present analysis. We present a series of descriptive statistics and regression results, emphasizing those r…

  • Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research

    Open Access•Joseph Rand, Ben Hoen•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2017•Cited by: 85•References: 14

  • Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research

    Open Access•Joseph Rand, Ben Hoen•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2017•Cited by: 85•References: 14

  • What to expect when you're expecting engagement

    Open Access•Karl Hoesch, Sarah Mills et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2024•Cited by: 11•References: 8

    Community engagement in the planning process to build large-scale solar (LSS) projects can win local support and advance procedural justice. However, an understanding of community engagement in current LSS development is lacking. Using responses from a U.S. nationwide survey (n = 979) of residential neighbors living within 3 miles (4.8 km) of completed LSS projects (i.e. “solar neighbors”) and project details from the U.S. Large-Scale Solar Photo…

  • Good fences make good neighbors

    Open Access•Douglas L Bessette, Ben Hoen et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2023•Cited by: 6•References: 28

    In order to meet decarbonization goals, the number of large-scale solar (LSS) facilities in the US is expected to increase considerably. The advantages of LSS over fossil-fueled power generation are numerous and well documented. However, residents living nearby proposed and existing LSS sites have voiced a number of concerns about LSS, including its possible impacts to farmland and agricultural production, biodiversity, stormwater runoff, home an…

  • Halfway up the ladder

    Open Access•Roberta S Nilson, Joseph Rand et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2024•Cited by: 5•References: 18

    Community engagement is a key pathway for incorporating social considerations into the development of utility-scale renewable energy facilities. Prior literature recommends meaningful, early community engagement to both improve siting outcomes and empower the public to participate in decision-making, but there is no recent nor comprehensive understanding of industry experiences with engagement. This study provides a critical contribution by revea…

  • Missing the mark

    Open Access•Douglas L Bessette, Joseph Rand et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 17

  • Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research

    Open Access•Joseph Rand, Ben Hoen•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2017•Cited by: 85•References: 14

  • Reconsidering barriers to wind power projects

    Open Access•Jeremy Firestone, Ben Hoen et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Environmental Policy &…•2018

    In 2016, we undertook a nationally representative wind power perceptions survey of individuals living within 8 km of over 600 projects in the United States, generating 1705 telephone, web, and mail responses. We sought information on a variety of topics, including procedural fairness and its relationship to project attitude, the foci of the present analysis. We present a series of descriptive statistics and regression results, emphasizing those r…

  • In the shadow of wind energy

    Open Access•Ryan Haac, Ryan Darlow et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2022•References: 3

    The moving shadows caused by wind turbines, referred to as “shadow flicker” (“SF”), are known to generate annoyance in a subset of the exposed population. However, the relationship between the level of modeled SF exposure and the population's perceived SF and SF annoyance is poorly understood. Improved understanding of SF exposure impacts could provide a basis for exposure thresholds and, in turn, potentially improve community acceptance of and e…

  • Good fences make good neighbors

    Open Access•Douglas L Bessette, Ben Hoen et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2023•Cited by: 6•References: 28

    In order to meet decarbonization goals, the number of large-scale solar (LSS) facilities in the US is expected to increase considerably. The advantages of LSS over fossil-fueled power generation are numerous and well documented. However, residents living nearby proposed and existing LSS sites have voiced a number of concerns about LSS, including its possible impacts to farmland and agricultural production, biodiversity, stormwater runoff, home an…

  • Halfway up the ladder

    Open Access•Roberta S Nilson, Joseph Rand et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2024•Cited by: 5•References: 18

    Community engagement is a key pathway for incorporating social considerations into the development of utility-scale renewable energy facilities. Prior literature recommends meaningful, early community engagement to both improve siting outcomes and empower the public to participate in decision-making, but there is no recent nor comprehensive understanding of industry experiences with engagement. This study provides a critical contribution by revea…

  • What to expect when you're expecting engagement

    Open Access•Karl Hoesch, Sarah Mills et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2024•Cited by: 11•References: 8

    Community engagement in the planning process to build large-scale solar (LSS) projects can win local support and advance procedural justice. However, an understanding of community engagement in current LSS development is lacking. Using responses from a U.S. nationwide survey (n = 979) of residential neighbors living within 3 miles (4.8 km) of completed LSS projects (i.e. “solar neighbors”) and project details from the U.S. Large-Scale Solar Photo…

  • Uplifting winds

    Open Access•Ben Hoen, Eric Brunner et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2025•References: 8

    A primary concern of stakeholders when considering a new wind project is the potential negative effects wind turbines may have on home values. Yet, what has been surprisingly overlooked in the literature and general discourse around wind energy is that the well-researched positive economic development and fiscal and amenity benefits of wind energy (e.g., increased tax base, tax revenue, better public services and employment gains) might positivel…

  • Missing the mark

    Open Access•Douglas L Bessette, Joseph Rand et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 17

  • Under-capacitated and over-powered? Rural austerity and asymmetrical negotiating relationships in US wind energy development

    Open Access•Salma Elmallah, Roberta S Nilson et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Rural Studies•2025•References: 46

    Though rural local governments are central actors in renewable energy development, local governments in the United States (US) remain systematically under-funded. This paper considers what the manifestations of austerity in local governments broadly and rural localities specifically mean for renewable energy development and for energy transitions. Drawing on a survey of 262 elected county officials with experience with wind energy in eight US sta…

Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (8 works) · Engineering (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Wind power (5 works) · Economics (4 works) · Electrical engineering (4 works) · Business (3 works) · Community engagement (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Energy and Environment Impacts (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae