Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

John E Laird

Biographic Data

ID4801438
NAMEJohn E Laird
GIVEN NAMESJohn E
FAMILY NAMELaird
SIGNATURELAIRD J E
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Aberdeen
ORCID0000-0001-7446-3241
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS12
TOTAL CITATIONS1
AUTHOR COUNT12
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1913
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1945
H-INDEX1
  • Mind and Deity

    E A Burtt, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1945

  • Theism and Hypertheism

    Open Access•John Laird, John E Laird•ARTICLE•Harvard Theological Review•1943

    Theists, I suppose, are persons who believe in “God's” existence. Atheists are persons who deny the same. Such statements may be suitable, and even adequate, for many proper purposes. In several contexts it is silly or malicious to interrogate them closely. Even in theology, which is, or should be, some kind of science, they may have, and they do have, their use and their propriety. For many theological purposes, however (and also for some others…

  • Theism and Cosmology

    William Kelley Wright, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1943

  • Theism and Cosmology

    Stephen Lee Ely, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1943

  • The Philosophy of Incarnation

    Open Access•John Laird, John E Laird•ARTICLE•Harvard Theological Review•1940

    My Design in these pages is to discuss, not the Incarnation, but the philosophy of incarnation as such, the word “incarnation” being interpreted very widely. What is commonly called the Incarnation in Christendom, at any rate when interpreted in the common way, is the birth and life of Christ more than 1900 years ago, that is to say a historical occasion, supposed to be unique in kind, in which one of the persons in the Godhead, although always G…

  • An Enquiry into Moral Notions

    Philip Wheelwright, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1938

  • Hume's Philosophy of Human Nature

    Ralph Withington Church, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1934

  • The Idea of Value

    A Wolf, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•Economica•1930

  • The Idea of Value

    H Reynard, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Economic Journal•1930

  • A Study in Moral Theory

    Warner Fite, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1927

  • A Study in Realism

    Alfred Haworth Jones, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1921

  • Value and Obligation

    John E Laird, J Laird•ARTICLE•The International Journal of Ethics•1913•Cited by: 1

  • Value and Obligation

    John E Laird, J Laird•ARTICLE•The International Journal of Ethics•1913•Cited by: 1

  • Value and Obligation

    John E Laird, J Laird•ARTICLE•The International Journal of Ethics•1913•Cited by: 1

  • A Study in Realism

    Alfred Haworth Jones, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1921

  • A Study in Moral Theory

    Warner Fite, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1927

  • The Idea of Value

    A Wolf, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•Economica•1930

  • The Idea of Value

    H Reynard, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Economic Journal•1930

  • Hume's Philosophy of Human Nature

    Ralph Withington Church, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1934

  • An Enquiry into Moral Notions

    Philip Wheelwright, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1938

  • The Philosophy of Incarnation

    Open Access•John Laird, John E Laird•ARTICLE•Harvard Theological Review•1940

    My Design in these pages is to discuss, not the Incarnation, but the philosophy of incarnation as such, the word “incarnation” being interpreted very widely. What is commonly called the Incarnation in Christendom, at any rate when interpreted in the common way, is the birth and life of Christ more than 1900 years ago, that is to say a historical occasion, supposed to be unique in kind, in which one of the persons in the Godhead, although always G…

  • Theism and Hypertheism

    Open Access•John Laird, John E Laird•ARTICLE•Harvard Theological Review•1943

    Theists, I suppose, are persons who believe in “God's” existence. Atheists are persons who deny the same. Such statements may be suitable, and even adequate, for many proper purposes. In several contexts it is silly or malicious to interrogate them closely. Even in theology, which is, or should be, some kind of science, they may have, and they do have, their use and their propriety. For many theological purposes, however (and also for some others…

  • Theism and Cosmology

    William Kelley Wright, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1943

  • Theism and Cosmology

    Stephen Lee Ely, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1943

  • Mind and Deity

    E A Burtt, John Laird et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1945

Epistemology (9 works) · Philosophy (9 works) · Analytic philosophy (5 works) · Contemporary philosophy (5 works) · General interest (4 works) · Theism (3 works) · Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 works) · Astronomy (2 works) · Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 works) · Cosmology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae