Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Carol A Nickerson

Biographic Data

ID4813494
NAMECarol A Nickerson
GIVEN NAMESCarol A
FAMILY NAMENickerson
SIGNATURENICKERSON C A
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Colorado Boulder
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS11
TOTAL CITATIONS18
AUTHOR COUNT11
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1981
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
H-INDEX2
  • There Is No Empirical Evidence for Critical Positivity Ratios

    Open Access•Carol A Nickerson•ARTICLE•Journal of Humanistic Psychology•2017•Cited by: 1•References: 6

    Fredrickson and Losada ( American Psychologist, 2005, 60, 678-686) theorized that a ratio of positive affect to negative affect (positivity ratio) of 2.9013 acts as a critical minimum for well-being. Recently, Brown, Sokal, and Friedman ( American Psychologist, 2013, 68, 801-813) convincingly demonstrated that the mathematical work underlying this critical minimum positivity ratio was both flawed and misapplied. This comment addresses Fredrickson…

  • Mutual Suppression

    Carol Nickerson, Carol A Nickerson•ARTICLE•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2008

    Paulhus, Robins, Trzesniewski, and Tracy (Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2004 , 39, 305-328) suggested that the three types of two-predictor suppression situations-classical suppression, cooperative suppression, and net suppression--can all be considered special cases of mutual suppression, in that the magnitude of each of the two standardized partial regression coefficients exceeds the magnitude of its corresponding standardized bivariate reg…

  • Altruism, Incentives, and Organ Donation

    John D Jasper, Carol A Nickerson et al.•ARTICLE•Medical Care•2004•References: 28

    OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the attitudes of the transplant community toward the current policy of altruistic organ donation and 6 alternative policies offering incentives to the donor family. METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine transplant surgeons, 143 transplant coordinators, and 134 critical-care nurses rated the moral appropriateness and success of the current policy of altruistic donation, rated the moral appropriateness of the alternati…

  • Dispositional Affect and Job Outcomes

    Open Access•Ed Diener, Carol Nickerson et al.•ARTICLE•Social Indicators Research•2002•Cited by: 12•References: 65

  • Who can catch a liar

    Carol A Nickerson, Kenneth R Hammond•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1993

  • Who can catch a liar

    Carol A Nickerson, Kenneth R Hammond•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1993

  • The attitude/behavior discrepancy as a methodological artifact

    Carol A Nickerson•ARTICLE•American Journal of Public Health•1990

    A recent questionnaire-based study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that although sexually active adolescents both believe that the use of condoms offers protection against sexually transmitted diseases and value such protection, they do not intend to use (or have their partners use) condoms. This attitude/behavior discrepancy is more apparent than real. Six methodological problems in the study are discussed in detail in o…

  • Across‐persons versus within‐persons tests of expectancy‐value models

    Open Access•Carol A Nickerson, Gary H Mcclelland•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1989•Cited by: 1•References: 4

    It has been asserted that (I) tests of expectancy‐value models require within‐persons analyses and that (2) within‐persons analyses yield better predictions of behavioral tendencies than do across‐persons analyses. The first assertion is correct; the second is not. Justification for within‐persons tests of expectancy‐value models must be made on theoretical rather than empirical grounds

  • Beliefs and values and the sterilization decision

    Open Access•Carol A Nickerson, Gary H Mcclelland•ARTICLE•Population and Environment•1988

  • Beliefs and values and the sterilization decision

    Open Access•Carol A Nickerson, Gary H Mcclelland•ARTICLE•Population and Environment•1987•References: 17

  • Determining the Impact of Sex Preferences on Fertility

    Open Access•Kathy R Widmer, Gary H Mcclelland et al.•ARTICLE•Demography•1981•Cited by: 4•References: 9

    The stopping rule measure of sex preferences represents a combination of psychological measures of preference and behavioral intentions. This study of 172 college students demonstrates that the stopping rule measure is a useful and practical method of measuring sex preferences. The results further indicate that parity progression ratio measures inherently underestimate the effect of sex preferences on individual fertility because they incorrectly…

  • Dispositional Affect and Job Outcomes

    Open Access•Ed Diener, Carol Nickerson et al.•ARTICLE•Social Indicators Research•2002•Cited by: 12•References: 65

  • Determining the Impact of Sex Preferences on Fertility

    Open Access•Kathy R Widmer, Gary H Mcclelland et al.•ARTICLE•Demography•1981•Cited by: 4•References: 9

    The stopping rule measure of sex preferences represents a combination of psychological measures of preference and behavioral intentions. This study of 172 college students demonstrates that the stopping rule measure is a useful and practical method of measuring sex preferences. The results further indicate that parity progression ratio measures inherently underestimate the effect of sex preferences on individual fertility because they incorrectly…

  • There Is No Empirical Evidence for Critical Positivity Ratios

    Open Access•Carol A Nickerson•ARTICLE•Journal of Humanistic Psychology•2017•Cited by: 1•References: 6

    Fredrickson and Losada ( American Psychologist, 2005, 60, 678-686) theorized that a ratio of positive affect to negative affect (positivity ratio) of 2.9013 acts as a critical minimum for well-being. Recently, Brown, Sokal, and Friedman ( American Psychologist, 2013, 68, 801-813) convincingly demonstrated that the mathematical work underlying this critical minimum positivity ratio was both flawed and misapplied. This comment addresses Fredrickson…

  • Across‐persons versus within‐persons tests of expectancy‐value models

    Open Access•Carol A Nickerson, Gary H Mcclelland•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1989•Cited by: 1•References: 4

    It has been asserted that (I) tests of expectancy‐value models require within‐persons analyses and that (2) within‐persons analyses yield better predictions of behavioral tendencies than do across‐persons analyses. The first assertion is correct; the second is not. Justification for within‐persons tests of expectancy‐value models must be made on theoretical rather than empirical grounds

  • Determining the Impact of Sex Preferences on Fertility

    Open Access•Kathy R Widmer, Gary H Mcclelland et al.•ARTICLE•Demography•1981•Cited by: 4•References: 9

    The stopping rule measure of sex preferences represents a combination of psychological measures of preference and behavioral intentions. This study of 172 college students demonstrates that the stopping rule measure is a useful and practical method of measuring sex preferences. The results further indicate that parity progression ratio measures inherently underestimate the effect of sex preferences on individual fertility because they incorrectly…

  • Beliefs and values and the sterilization decision

    Open Access•Carol A Nickerson, Gary H Mcclelland•ARTICLE•Population and Environment•1987•References: 17

  • Beliefs and values and the sterilization decision

    Open Access•Carol A Nickerson, Gary H Mcclelland•ARTICLE•Population and Environment•1988

  • Across‐persons versus within‐persons tests of expectancy‐value models

    Open Access•Carol A Nickerson, Gary H Mcclelland•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1989•Cited by: 1•References: 4

    It has been asserted that (I) tests of expectancy‐value models require within‐persons analyses and that (2) within‐persons analyses yield better predictions of behavioral tendencies than do across‐persons analyses. The first assertion is correct; the second is not. Justification for within‐persons tests of expectancy‐value models must be made on theoretical rather than empirical grounds

  • The attitude/behavior discrepancy as a methodological artifact

    Carol A Nickerson•ARTICLE•American Journal of Public Health•1990

    A recent questionnaire-based study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that although sexually active adolescents both believe that the use of condoms offers protection against sexually transmitted diseases and value such protection, they do not intend to use (or have their partners use) condoms. This attitude/behavior discrepancy is more apparent than real. Six methodological problems in the study are discussed in detail in o…

  • Who can catch a liar

    Carol A Nickerson, Kenneth R Hammond•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1993

  • Who can catch a liar

    Carol A Nickerson, Kenneth R Hammond•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1993

  • Dispositional Affect and Job Outcomes

    Open Access•Ed Diener, Carol Nickerson et al.•ARTICLE•Social Indicators Research•2002•Cited by: 12•References: 65

  • Altruism, Incentives, and Organ Donation

    John D Jasper, Carol A Nickerson et al.•ARTICLE•Medical Care•2004•References: 28

    OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the attitudes of the transplant community toward the current policy of altruistic organ donation and 6 alternative policies offering incentives to the donor family. METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine transplant surgeons, 143 transplant coordinators, and 134 critical-care nurses rated the moral appropriateness and success of the current policy of altruistic donation, rated the moral appropriateness of the alternati…

  • Mutual Suppression

    Carol Nickerson, Carol A Nickerson•ARTICLE•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2008

    Paulhus, Robins, Trzesniewski, and Tracy (Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2004 , 39, 305-328) suggested that the three types of two-predictor suppression situations-classical suppression, cooperative suppression, and net suppression--can all be considered special cases of mutual suppression, in that the magnitude of each of the two standardized partial regression coefficients exceeds the magnitude of its corresponding standardized bivariate reg…

  • There Is No Empirical Evidence for Critical Positivity Ratios

    Open Access•Carol A Nickerson•ARTICLE•Journal of Humanistic Psychology•2017•Cited by: 1•References: 6

    Fredrickson and Losada ( American Psychologist, 2005, 60, 678-686) theorized that a ratio of positive affect to negative affect (positivity ratio) of 2.9013 acts as a critical minimum for well-being. Recently, Brown, Sokal, and Friedman ( American Psychologist, 2013, 68, 801-813) convincingly demonstrated that the mathematical work underlying this critical minimum positivity ratio was both flawed and misapplied. This comment addresses Fredrickson…

Psychology (9 works) · Social Psychology (6 works) · Social Psychology (5 works) · Mathematics (4 works) · Medicine (4 works) · Statistics (4 works) · Economics (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Population (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae