Colleen Smith
Biographic Data
| ID | 4977340 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Colleen Smith |
| GIVEN NAMES | Colleen |
| FAMILY NAME | Smith |
| SIGNATURE | SMITH C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Syracuse University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4885-6823 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 219 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1990 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1992 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration
This paper reports the results of a meta‐analytic integration of the results of 137 tests of the ingroup bias hypothesis. Overall, the ingroup bias effect was highly significant and of moderate magnitude. Several theoretically informative determinants of the ingroup bias effect were established. This ingroup bias effect was significantly stronger when the ingroup was made salient (by virtue of proportionate size and by virtue of reality of the gr…
Boundaries Around Group Interaction: A Meta-Analytic Integration of the Effects of Group Size
We report a meta-analytic integration that summarizes American research by psychologists on the effects of group size on the permeability of group boundaries. Results indicate that the tendency for larger groups to have less permeable boundaries is highly significant but of small magnitude. This impermeability generally increases as a function of the relative size of the larger group and decreases as a function of the interpersonal distance betwe…
Social Projection as a Function of Actual Consensus
A sample of American students responded to a series of political-opinion questions, indicating their own choices and estimating the consensus for each choice. Analyses revealed the standard social projection patterns (underestimation by majorities, overestimation by minorities, and overall false consensus). Moreover, social projection varied as a function of the actual consensus: As the minority's actual consensus decreased, its overestimation in…
Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration
This paper reports the results of a meta‐analytic integration of the results of 137 tests of the ingroup bias hypothesis. Overall, the ingroup bias effect was highly significant and of moderate magnitude. Several theoretically informative determinants of the ingroup bias effect were established. This ingroup bias effect was significantly stronger when the ingroup was made salient (by virtue of proportionate size and by virtue of reality of the gr…
Social Projection as a Function of Actual Consensus
A sample of American students responded to a series of political-opinion questions, indicating their own choices and estimating the consensus for each choice. Analyses revealed the standard social projection patterns (underestimation by majorities, overestimation by minorities, and overall false consensus). Moreover, social projection varied as a function of the actual consensus: As the minority's actual consensus decreased, its overestimation in…
Social Projection as a Function of Actual Consensus
A sample of American students responded to a series of political-opinion questions, indicating their own choices and estimating the consensus for each choice. Analyses revealed the standard social projection patterns (underestimation by majorities, overestimation by minorities, and overall false consensus). Moreover, social projection varied as a function of the actual consensus: As the minority's actual consensus decreased, its overestimation in…
Boundaries Around Group Interaction: A Meta-Analytic Integration of the Effects of Group Size
We report a meta-analytic integration that summarizes American research by psychologists on the effects of group size on the permeability of group boundaries. Results indicate that the tendency for larger groups to have less permeable boundaries is highly significant but of small magnitude. This impermeability generally increases as a function of the relative size of the larger group and decreases as a function of the interpersonal distance betwe…
Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration
This paper reports the results of a meta‐analytic integration of the results of 137 tests of the ingroup bias hypothesis. Overall, the ingroup bias effect was highly significant and of moderate magnitude. Several theoretically informative determinants of the ingroup bias effect were established. This ingroup bias effect was significantly stronger when the ingroup was made salient (by virtue of proportionate size and by virtue of reality of the gr…
Psychology (3 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 works) · Function (biology (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Algorithm (1 works) · Boundary (topology (1 works) · Categorization (1 works) · Cognitive psychology (1 works)