Jerry A Fodor
Biographic Data
| ID | 499093 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jerry A Fodor |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jerry A |
| FAMILY NAME | Fodor |
| SIGNATURE | FODOR J A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 46 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 251 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 46 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1962 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2008 |
| H-INDEX | 6 |
Lot 2: The Language of Thought Revisited
This book presents a new development of the famous Language of Thought hypothesis, which has since the 1970s been at the centre of interdisciplinary debate about how the mind works. The book defends and extends the groundbreaking idea that thinking is couched in a symbolic system realized in the brain. This idea is central to the representational theory of mind which has been established as a key reference point in modern philosophy, psychology, …
Pourquoi les porcs n'ont pas d'ailes
Brandom Beleaguered
How the mind works: What we still don't know
Daedalus Summer 2006 One could make a case that the history of cognitive science, insofar as it’s been any sort of success, has consisted largely of 1⁄2nding more and more things about cognition that we didn’t know and didn’t know that we didn’t. ‘Throwing some light on how much dark there is,’ as I’ve put it elsewhere. The professional cognitive scientist has a lot of perplexity to endure, but he can be pretty sure that he’s gotten in on the gro…
Brandom's Burdens: Compositionality and Inferentialism
The Mind Doesn't Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology
In this engaging book, Jerry Fodor argues against the widely held view that mental processes are largely computations, that the architecture of cognition is massively modular, and that the explanation of our innate mental structure is basically Darwinian. Although Fodor has praised the computational theory of mind as the best theory of cognition that we have got, he considers it to be only a fragment of the truth. In fact, he claims, cognitive sc…
The mind doesn't work that way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology
In this engaging book, Jerry Fodor argues against the widely held view that mental processes are largely computations, that the architecture of cognition is massively modular, and that the explanation of our innate mental structure is basically Darwinian. Although Fodor has praised the computational theory of mind as the best theory of cognition that we have got, he considers it to be only a fragment of the truth. In fact, he claims, cognitive sc…
All at Sea in Semantic Space: Churchland on Meaning Similarity
Impossible Words
July 01 1999 Impossible Words? In Special Collection: CogNet Jerry Fodor, Jerry Fodor Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, Psychology (Annex), Busch Campus, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, [email protected] Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Ernie Lepore Ernie Lepore Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, Psychology (Annex), Busch Campus, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, lepore@ruccs.…
Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong
Jerry Fodor presents a strikingly original theory of the basic constituents of thought. He suggests that the heart of a cognitive science is its theory of concepts, and that cognitive scientists have gone badly wrong in many areas because their assumptions about concepts have been seriously mistaken. Fodor argues compellingly for an atomistic theory of concepts, and maintains that future work on human cognition should build upon new foundations. …
In Critical Condition: Polemical Essays on Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Mind
In this book Jerry Fodor contrasts his views about the mind with those of a number of well-known philosophers and cognitive scientists, including John McDowell, Christopher Peacocke, Paul Churchland, Daniel Dennett, Paul Smolensky, and Richard Dawkins. In this book Jerry Fodor contrasts his views about the mind with those of a number of well-known philosophers and cognitive scientists, including John McDowell, Christopher Peacocke, Paul Churchlan…
Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong
In critical condition: Polemical Essays on Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Mind
Doing philosophy, according to Jerry Fodor, is like piloting: The trick is to find an object of known position and locate yourself with respect to it. In this book, Fodor contrasts his views about the mind with those of a number of well-known philosophers and cognitive scientists, including John McDowell, Christopher Peacocke, Paul Churchland, Daniel Dennett, Paul Smolensky, and Richard Dawkins. Fodor constructs a version of the representational …
The Emptiness of the Lexicon: Reflections on James Pustejovsky's The Generative Lexicon
We consider Pustejovsky's account of the semantic lexicon. We discuss and reject his argument that the complexity of lexical entries is required to account for lexical generativity. Finally, we defend a sort of lexical atomism: though, strictly speaking, we concede that lexical entries are typically complex, still we claim that their complexity does not jeopardize either the thesis that lexical meaning is atomistic or the identification of lexica…
The Elm and the Expert
Journal Article Book Reviews Get access The Elm and the Expert. By Jerry Fodor. (MIT Press, 1994. Pp. xii + 129. Price $19-95-) Steven Horst Steven Horst Wesleyan University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 46, Issue 183, April 1996, Pages 243–246, https://doi.org/10.2307/2956393 Published: 01 April 1996
The Elm and the Expert: Mentalese and Its Semantics
Is Radical Interpretation Possible
Argument form T 1. No language would be interpretable at all unless it were radically interpretable;2 that is, unless it were interpretable from the epistemic position of a radical interpreter. 2. No language would be radically interpretable unless it were F.3 3. (Natural) languages are actually interpreted (for example, by children who learn them and field linguists who translate them); hence, natural languages are radically interpretable. 4. Th…
What Is The Connection Principle
The Connection Principle (hereafter, CP) says that there is some kind of internal relation between a state's having intentional content (aspectual shape) and its being (at least potentially) conscious. Searle's argument for the principle is just that potential consciousness is the only thing he can think of that would distinguish original intentionality from ersatz (Searle, 1992, pp. 84, 155 and passim. All Searle references are to 1992). Cogniti…
Reply to Critics
Precis of Holism: A Shopper's Guide
Holism: A Shopper's Guide
Journal Article Book Reviews Get access Holism: a Shopper’s Guide. By Jerry Fodor and Ernest Lepore. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. Pp. xiv + 274. Price £30.00 h/b, £9.95 p/b.) Michael Morris Michael Morris University of Sussex Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 43, Issue 172, July 1993, Pages 394–396, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219912 Published: 01 July 1993
A Theory of Content and Other Essays
A Theory of Content and Other Essays
A Theory of Content and Other Essays
Journal Article Critical Notice Get access A Theory qfConlent and Other Essays. By Jerry A. Fodor. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990. Pp. xii + 270. Price £26.95.) Alan Millar Alan Millar University of Stirling Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 42, Issue 168, July 1992, Pages 367–372, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219687 Published: 01 July 1992
Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind
The Structure of a Semantic Theory
This paper does not attempt to present a semantic theory of a natural language, but rather to characterize the form of such a theory. A semantic theory of a natural language is part of a linguistic description of that language. Our problem, on the other hand, is part of the general theory of language, fully on a par with the problem of characterizing the structure of grammars of natural languages. A characterization of the abstract form of a sema…
The Modularity of Mind
This study synthesizes current information from the various fields of cognitive science in support of a new and exciting theory of mind. Most psychologists study horizontal processes like memory and information flow; Fodor postulates a vertical and modular psychological organization underlying biologically coherent behaviors. This view of mental architecture is consistent with the historical tradition of faculty psychology while integrating a com…
Observation Reconsidered
Several arguments are considered which purport to demonstrate the impossibility of theory-neutral observation. The most important of these infers the continuity of observation with theory from the presumed continuity of perception with cognition, a doctrine widely espoused in recent cognitive psychology. An alternative psychological account of the relation between cognition and perception is proposed and its epistemological consequences for the o…
Brandom Beleaguered
Impossible Words
July 01 1999 Impossible Words? In Special Collection: CogNet Jerry Fodor, Jerry Fodor Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, Psychology (Annex), Busch Campus, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, [email protected] Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Ernie Lepore Ernie Lepore Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, Psychology (Annex), Busch Campus, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, lepore@ruccs.…
The Emptiness of the Lexicon: Reflections on James Pustejovsky's The Generative Lexicon
We consider Pustejovsky's account of the semantic lexicon. We discuss and reject his argument that the complexity of lexical entries is required to account for lexical generativity. Finally, we defend a sort of lexical atomism: though, strictly speaking, we concede that lexical entries are typically complex, still we claim that their complexity does not jeopardize either the thesis that lexical meaning is atomistic or the identification of lexica…
Symbol Formation: An Organismic-Developmental Approach to Language and the Expression of Thought
The Availability of What We Say
How the mind works: What we still don't know
Daedalus Summer 2006 One could make a case that the history of cognitive science, insofar as it’s been any sort of success, has consisted largely of 1⁄2nding more and more things about cognition that we didn’t know and didn’t know that we didn’t. ‘Throwing some light on how much dark there is,’ as I’ve put it elsewhere. The professional cognitive scientist has a lot of perplexity to endure, but he can be pretty sure that he’s gotten in on the gro…
Brandom's Burdens: Compositionality and Inferentialism
Holism: A Shopper's Guide
Journal Article Book Reviews Get access Holism: a Shopper’s Guide. By Jerry Fodor and Ernest Lepore. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. Pp. xiv + 274. Price £30.00 h/b, £9.95 p/b.) Michael Morris Michael Morris University of Sussex Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 43, Issue 172, July 1993, Pages 394–396, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219912 Published: 01 July 1993
Precis of Holism: A Shopper's Guide
On Knowing What We Would Say
Questions of Meaning
Pain
The Availability of What We Say
Questions of Meaning
The Structure of a Semantic Theory
This paper does not attempt to present a semantic theory of a natural language, but rather to characterize the form of such a theory. A semantic theory of a natural language is part of a linguistic description of that language. Our problem, on the other hand, is part of the general theory of language, fully on a par with the problem of characterizing the structure of grammars of natural languages. A characterization of the abstract form of a sema…
A Reply to Dixon’s “A Trend in Semantics”
On Knowing What We Would Say
Conditions for Description
Symbol Formation: An Organismic-Developmental Approach to Language and the Expression of Thought
The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language
Journal Article Critical Study Get access The Structure of Language : Readings in the philosophy of language. Edited by Jerry A. Fodor and Jerrold J. Katz. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-Hall. 1964. [London, 1965.] Pp. xii + 612. Price £4). L. Jonathan Cohen L. Jonathan Cohen The Queen's College, Oxford Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 16, Issue 63, April 1966, Pages …
The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
Psychological Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychology
The Language of Thought
Reply to Professor Zaitchik
The Modularity of Mind
This study synthesizes current information from the various fields of cognitive science in support of a new and exciting theory of mind. Most psychologists study horizontal processes like memory and information flow; Fodor postulates a vertical and modular psychological organization underlying biologically coherent behaviors. This view of mental architecture is consistent with the historical tradition of faculty psychology while integrating a com…
Observation Reconsidered
Several arguments are considered which purport to demonstrate the impossibility of theory-neutral observation. The most important of these infers the continuity of observation with theory from the presumed continuity of perception with cognition, a doctrine widely espoused in recent cognitive psychology. An alternative psychological account of the relation between cognition and perception is proposed and its epistemological consequences for the o…
Why Paramecia Don't Have Mental Representations
Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind
Psychosemantics explores the relation between commonsense psychological theories and problems that are central to semantics and the philosophy of language. Building on and extending Fodor's earlier work it puts folk psychology on firm theoretical ground and rebuts externalist, holist, and naturalist threats to its position. Bradford Books imprint
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis
A Reply to Churchland's “Perceptual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality”
Churchland's paper “Perceptual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality“ offers empirical, semantical and epistemological arguments intended to show that the cognitive impenetrability of perception “does not establish a theory-neutral foundation for knowledge” and that the psychological account of perceptual encapsulation that I set forth in The Modularity of Mind “[is] almost certainly false“. The present paper considers these arguments in detail a…
Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind (Explorations in Cognitive Science)
Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind
A Theory of Content and Other Essays
A Theory of Content and Other Essays
A Theory of Content and Other Essays
Journal Article Critical Notice Get access A Theory qfConlent and Other Essays. By Jerry A. Fodor. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990. Pp. xii + 270. Price £26.95.) Alan Millar Alan Millar University of Stirling Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 42, Issue 168, July 1992, Pages 367–372, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219687 Published: 01 July 1992
Philosophy (34 works) · Epistemology (26 works) · Psychology (22 works) · Computer Science (14 works) · Linguistics (14 works) · Cognitive science (11 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 works) · Contemporary philosophy (10 works) · Analytic philosophy (9 works) · General interest (8 works)