John E Pierce
Biographic Data
| ID | 5005375 |
|---|---|
| NAME | John E Pierce |
| GIVEN NAMES | John E |
| FAMILY NAME | Pierce |
| SIGNATURE | PIERCE J E |
| AFFILIATIONS | La Trobe University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5164-5106 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1984 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Aphasia-specific or generic outcomes? a comparison of two health-related quality of life instruments for economic evaluations of aphasia treatments
Our findings suggest that EQ-5D-3L use in economic evaluations including people with aphasia requires caution. Alternative HRQOL instruments require evaluation to ensure fair prioritisation of aphasia treatments
Establishing Quality Indicators and Implementation Priorities for Post‐Stroke Aphasia Services Through End‐User Involvement
BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no agreed quality standards for post-stroke aphasia services. Therefore, it is unknown if care reflects best practices or meets the expectations of people living with aphasia. We aimed to (1) shortlist, (2) operationalise and (3) prioritise best practice recommendations for post-stroke aphasia care. METHODS: Three phases of research were conducted. In Phase 1, recommendations with strong evidence and/or known to b…
Development of a rural behavioral emergency training program
No prominent works on this page.
Development of a rural behavioral emergency training program
Establishing Quality Indicators and Implementation Priorities for Post‐Stroke Aphasia Services Through End‐User Involvement
BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no agreed quality standards for post-stroke aphasia services. Therefore, it is unknown if care reflects best practices or meets the expectations of people living with aphasia. We aimed to (1) shortlist, (2) operationalise and (3) prioritise best practice recommendations for post-stroke aphasia care. METHODS: Three phases of research were conducted. In Phase 1, recommendations with strong evidence and/or known to b…
Aphasia-specific or generic outcomes? a comparison of two health-related quality of life instruments for economic evaluations of aphasia treatments
Our findings suggest that EQ-5D-3L use in economic evaluations including people with aphasia requires caution. Alternative HRQOL instruments require evaluation to ensure fair prioritisation of aphasia treatments
Medicine (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Aphasia (2 works) · Medical education (2 works) · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 works) · Nursing (2 works) · Psychiatry (2 works) · Applied Psychology (1 work) · Applied Psychology (1 work) · Artificial Intelligence (1 work)