R J AUDLEY
Biographic Data
| ID | 5010659 |
|---|---|
| NAME | R J AUDLEY |
| GIVEN NAMES | R J |
| FAMILY NAME | AUDLEY |
| SIGNATURE | AUDLEY R J |
| AFFILIATIONS | UCL Australia |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1964 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1965 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Cross‐over‘ Effect: A Reply to Arthur
Response Instructions and the Speed of Relative Judgements: Ii. Pitch Discrimination
Subjects were required to make easy pitch discriminations at four frequency levels. In a counterbalanced design, for half their judgements they were required to choose the higher of the pair of tones, and for the other half, the lower. It was found that subjects were quicker at choosing the higher than the lower of two high tones, but quicker at choosing the lower than the higher of two low tones. This ‘cross‐over’ effect was found to be graded a…
Response Instructions and the Speed of Relative Judgements: I. Some Experiments on Brightness Discrimination
It is hypothesized that the speed with which a relative judgement is made between two stimuli on any given dimension depends upon the relation between the general position of the stimuli on the dimension and the direction of the required judgement along this. Experiments involving the discrimination of light patches of different luminance are reported which support this hypothesis. They show that subjects are quicker at choosing the brighter than…
Response Instructions and the Speed of Relative Judgements: I. Some Experiments on Brightness Discrimination
It is hypothesized that the speed with which a relative judgement is made between two stimuli on any given dimension depends upon the relation between the general position of the stimuli on the dimension and the direction of the required judgement along this. Experiments involving the discrimination of light patches of different luminance are reported which support this hypothesis. They show that subjects are quicker at choosing the brighter than…
Response Instructions and the Speed of Relative Judgements: Ii. Pitch Discrimination
Subjects were required to make easy pitch discriminations at four frequency levels. In a counterbalanced design, for half their judgements they were required to choose the higher of the pair of tones, and for the other half, the lower. It was found that subjects were quicker at choosing the higher than the lower of two high tones, but quicker at choosing the lower than the higher of two low tones. This ‘cross‐over’ effect was found to be graded a…
Response Instructions and the Speed of Relative Judgements: Ii. Pitch Discrimination
Subjects were required to make easy pitch discriminations at four frequency levels. In a counterbalanced design, for half their judgements they were required to choose the higher of the pair of tones, and for the other half, the lower. It was found that subjects were quicker at choosing the higher than the lower of two high tones, but quicker at choosing the lower than the higher of two low tones. This ‘cross‐over’ effect was found to be graded a…
Response Instructions and the Speed of Relative Judgements: I. Some Experiments on Brightness Discrimination
It is hypothesized that the speed with which a relative judgement is made between two stimuli on any given dimension depends upon the relation between the general position of the stimuli on the dimension and the direction of the required judgement along this. Experiments involving the discrimination of light patches of different luminance are reported which support this hypothesis. They show that subjects are quicker at choosing the brighter than…
Cross‐over‘ Effect: A Reply to Arthur
Psychology (3 works) · Cognitive psychology (2 works) · Optics (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Audiology (1 works) · Brightness (1 works) · Citation (1 works) · Color perception and design (1 works) · Computer Science (1 works) · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (1 works)