Déana Scipio
Biographic Data
| ID | 5071100 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Déana Scipio |
| GIVEN NAMES | Déana |
| FAMILY NAME | Scipio |
| SIGNATURE | SCIPIO D |
| AFFILIATIONS | Islandwood Bainbridge Island Washington USA |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0499-0529 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Proposing a Framework to Center Justice in Ambitious Science Teaching
Though educators and researchers have developed shared theory and language for priorities necessary to disrupt the status quo toward more equitable science education, we lack a tool that organizes sets of teaching practices across an instructional unit to support enactment and rehearsal. Core sets of practices, such as those included in the Ambitious Science Teaching (AST) framework (Windschitl et al. 2018), have been shown to nurture diverse stu…
(Pedagogies of Joy;) A Leap to Joy‐Centered Critical Design
Prior research demonstrates the integral nature of affective work in STEM/STEAM, including multiple works in this issue. In our contribution to this special issue on Centering Affect and Emotion Toward Justice and Dignity in Science Education, we seek to better understand the role of joy, an emotion that moves beyond the temporary shallows of happiness into the depths of complexity that connects fear and joy, constraint and transformation, and hu…
I sit here thinking I can do this”—Developing justice‐centered ambitious science teaching identities in professional learning communities
Explicitly attending to justice in science teaching and learning is long overdue. Here, we examined the professional teacher identity development of 13 science teachers as they collaborated in networked professional learning communities (PLCs) to implement and revise a culture‐setting unit focused on the science of COVID and engaging in collaborative inquiry cycles to identify and refine justice‐centered ambitious science teaching (JuST) practice…
Epistemic injustice and the “Nature of Science
Scientists and science educators have argued that learners (students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers) should understand knowledge construction in science, in addition to figuring out disciplinary core ideas. Given this goal, some science education scholars created a construct called the “Nature of Science” (NOS), which aims to simplify the complex work of scientific knowledge production for learners. Since the 1980s, the NOS construc…
Beginning with the end in mind
This paper is one of three sequential papers interrogating equity in partnerships (or partnering relationships [PRs]) in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. In this piece, we prioritize abundance framing and dignity‐conferring work when engaging in partnerships with and for communities who have been historically marginalized. We propose a framework of seven drivers that define the directions and/or success of PRs: (1) mis…
Epistemic injustice and the “Nature of Science
Scientists and science educators have argued that learners (students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers) should understand knowledge construction in science, in addition to figuring out disciplinary core ideas. Given this goal, some science education scholars created a construct called the “Nature of Science” (NOS), which aims to simplify the complex work of scientific knowledge production for learners. Since the 1980s, the NOS construc…
(Pedagogies of Joy;) A Leap to Joy‐Centered Critical Design
Prior research demonstrates the integral nature of affective work in STEM/STEAM, including multiple works in this issue. In our contribution to this special issue on Centering Affect and Emotion Toward Justice and Dignity in Science Education, we seek to better understand the role of joy, an emotion that moves beyond the temporary shallows of happiness into the depths of complexity that connects fear and joy, constraint and transformation, and hu…
Beginning with the end in mind
This paper is one of three sequential papers interrogating equity in partnerships (or partnering relationships [PRs]) in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. In this piece, we prioritize abundance framing and dignity‐conferring work when engaging in partnerships with and for communities who have been historically marginalized. We propose a framework of seven drivers that define the directions and/or success of PRs: (1) mis…
I sit here thinking I can do this”—Developing justice‐centered ambitious science teaching identities in professional learning communities
Explicitly attending to justice in science teaching and learning is long overdue. Here, we examined the professional teacher identity development of 13 science teachers as they collaborated in networked professional learning communities (PLCs) to implement and revise a culture‐setting unit focused on the science of COVID and engaging in collaborative inquiry cycles to identify and refine justice‐centered ambitious science teaching (JuST) practice…
Epistemic injustice and the “Nature of Science
Scientists and science educators have argued that learners (students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers) should understand knowledge construction in science, in addition to figuring out disciplinary core ideas. Given this goal, some science education scholars created a construct called the “Nature of Science” (NOS), which aims to simplify the complex work of scientific knowledge production for learners. Since the 1980s, the NOS construc…
Proposing a Framework to Center Justice in Ambitious Science Teaching
Though educators and researchers have developed shared theory and language for priorities necessary to disrupt the status quo toward more equitable science education, we lack a tool that organizes sets of teaching practices across an instructional unit to support enactment and rehearsal. Core sets of practices, such as those included in the Ambitious Science Teaching (AST) framework (Windschitl et al. 2018), have been shown to nurture diverse stu…
(Pedagogies of Joy;) A Leap to Joy‐Centered Critical Design
Prior research demonstrates the integral nature of affective work in STEM/STEAM, including multiple works in this issue. In our contribution to this special issue on Centering Affect and Emotion Toward Justice and Dignity in Science Education, we seek to better understand the role of joy, an emotion that moves beyond the temporary shallows of happiness into the depths of complexity that connects fear and joy, constraint and transformation, and hu…
Psychology (4 works) · Science education (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Career Development and Diversity (3 works) · Pedagogy (3 works) · Dignity (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Engineering ethics (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Mathematics education (2 works)