Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jeff Behrends

Biographic Data

ID5086962
NAMEJeff Behrends
GIVEN NAMESJeff
FAMILY NAMEBehrends
SIGNATUREBEHRENDS J
AFFILIATIONSHarvard University Press
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS13
WORKS AS AUTHOR7
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2011
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2
  • What we owe to decision-subjects

    Open Access•David Gray Grant, Jeff Behrends et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 61

    The ongoing explosion of interest in artificial intelligence is fueled in part by recently developed techniques in machine learning. Those techniques allow automated systems to process huge amounts of data, utilizing mathematical methods that depart from traditional statistical approaches, and resulting in impressive advancements in our ability to make predictions and uncover correlations across a host of interesting domains. But as is now widely…

  • Normative Source and Extensional Adequacy

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2016

    Internalists about practical reasons maintain that all of an agent’s reasons for action derive their normative force via some relation in which they stand with that agent’s pro-attitudes, or the pro-attitudes that the agent would have in some idealized set of circumstances. One common complaint against internalism is that the view is extensionally inadequate—that it cannot render the correct verdicts about what reasons agents have in a range of i…

  • Reason to Promotion Inferences

    Open Access•Joshua DiPaolo, Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2015

    No abstract

  • Problems and solutions for a hybrid approach to grounding practical normativity

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2015•Cited by: 7•References: 9

    Source Hybridism about practical reasons is the position that facts that constitute reasons sometimes derive their normative force from external metaphysical grounds, and sometimes from internal. Although historically less popular than either Source Internalism or Source Externalism, hybridism has lately begun to garner more attention. Here, I further the hybridist’s cause by defending Source Hybridism from three objections. I argue that we are n…

  • Meta‐normative Realism, Evolution, and Our Reasons to Survive

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 7

    In this article, I articulate and respond to an epistemological challenge to meta‐normative realism. The challenge has it that, if realism about the normative is correct, and if evolutionary forces have significantly influenced our normative judgments, then it would be a remarkable coincidence if the content of the normative facts and our normative judgments were aligned. I criticize D avid E noch's recent attempt to meet this challenge, but prov…

  • Finlay and Schroeder on Promoting a Desire

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends, Joshua DiPaolo•ARTICLE•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2012

    This paper argues against two prominent accounts of what it is to "promote a desire" found in the work of Stephen Finlay and Mark Schroeder

  • A New Argument for the Multiplicity of the Good-for Relation

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2011

  • Problems and solutions for a hybrid approach to grounding practical normativity

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2015•Cited by: 7•References: 9

    Source Hybridism about practical reasons is the position that facts that constitute reasons sometimes derive their normative force from external metaphysical grounds, and sometimes from internal. Although historically less popular than either Source Internalism or Source Externalism, hybridism has lately begun to garner more attention. Here, I further the hybridist’s cause by defending Source Hybridism from three objections. I argue that we are n…

  • Meta‐normative Realism, Evolution, and Our Reasons to Survive

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 7

    In this article, I articulate and respond to an epistemological challenge to meta‐normative realism. The challenge has it that, if realism about the normative is correct, and if evolutionary forces have significantly influenced our normative judgments, then it would be a remarkable coincidence if the content of the normative facts and our normative judgments were aligned. I criticize D avid E noch's recent attempt to meet this challenge, but prov…

  • What we owe to decision-subjects

    Open Access•David Gray Grant, Jeff Behrends et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 61

    The ongoing explosion of interest in artificial intelligence is fueled in part by recently developed techniques in machine learning. Those techniques allow automated systems to process huge amounts of data, utilizing mathematical methods that depart from traditional statistical approaches, and resulting in impressive advancements in our ability to make predictions and uncover correlations across a host of interesting domains. But as is now widely…

  • A New Argument for the Multiplicity of the Good-for Relation

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2011

  • Finlay and Schroeder on Promoting a Desire

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends, Joshua DiPaolo•ARTICLE•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2012

    This paper argues against two prominent accounts of what it is to "promote a desire" found in the work of Stephen Finlay and Mark Schroeder

  • Meta‐normative Realism, Evolution, and Our Reasons to Survive

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 7

    In this article, I articulate and respond to an epistemological challenge to meta‐normative realism. The challenge has it that, if realism about the normative is correct, and if evolutionary forces have significantly influenced our normative judgments, then it would be a remarkable coincidence if the content of the normative facts and our normative judgments were aligned. I criticize D avid E noch's recent attempt to meet this challenge, but prov…

  • Reason to Promotion Inferences

    Open Access•Joshua DiPaolo, Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2015

    No abstract

  • Problems and solutions for a hybrid approach to grounding practical normativity

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2015•Cited by: 7•References: 9

    Source Hybridism about practical reasons is the position that facts that constitute reasons sometimes derive their normative force from external metaphysical grounds, and sometimes from internal. Although historically less popular than either Source Internalism or Source Externalism, hybridism has lately begun to garner more attention. Here, I further the hybridist’s cause by defending Source Hybridism from three objections. I argue that we are n…

  • Normative Source and Extensional Adequacy

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends•ARTICLE•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2016

    Internalists about practical reasons maintain that all of an agent’s reasons for action derive their normative force via some relation in which they stand with that agent’s pro-attitudes, or the pro-attitudes that the agent would have in some idealized set of circumstances. One common complaint against internalism is that the view is extensionally inadequate—that it cannot render the correct verdicts about what reasons agents have in a range of i…

  • What we owe to decision-subjects

    Open Access•David Gray Grant, Jeff Behrends et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 61

    The ongoing explosion of interest in artificial intelligence is fueled in part by recently developed techniques in machine learning. Those techniques allow automated systems to process huge amounts of data, utilizing mathematical methods that depart from traditional statistical approaches, and resulting in impressive advancements in our ability to make predictions and uncover correlations across a host of interesting domains. But as is now widely…

Epistemology (6 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 works) · Normative (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Free Will and Agency (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae