Oxana Pimenova
Biographic Data
| ID | 5096322 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Oxana Pimenova |
| GIVEN NAMES | Oxana |
| FAMILY NAME | Pimenova |
| SIGNATURE | PIMENOVA O |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Saskatchewan |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2818-2152 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 6 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
“Deliberative Context” Is not the Whole Story of Deliberative Reasoning
Advancing critical discourse analysis of Indigenous consultations
The paper conducts the critical discourse analysis of Indigenous consultation reports with the help of Argument Continuity, a brand-new critical discourse analysis category. Argument Continuity is a set of the same arguments and counterarguments repeatedly produced/reproduced by the institutionally dominant arguer through an adversarial reasoning process to dismiss opposing arguments without reflecting upon their merits. Argument Continuity is co…
Dominant Discourse in Indigenous Consultations
In Canada, consulting with Indigenous communities over recourse projects, the Crown sometimes avoids critical engagement with them, holding to the same arguments and counterarguments through regulatory and hearing stages. Such hollow moves, produced under the Crown’s rules, become embedded in the dominant argumentative discourse and pass unnoticed. To detect them, I apply Argument Continuities ( ac s) – a new category of argumentative discourse a…
The Trans-Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project
This article examines the production and reproduction of the same arguments made by the Crown in consultations with Indigenous peoples over a controversial resource development project in Canada. To explain the stability of the Crown’s reasoning in consultations with Indigenous communities on Trans-Mountain Pipeline Expansion project (TM), I integrate the path dependence concept with the theory of motivated reasoning while keeping the analytical …
Greenhouse Regulation
In my research, I propose to place new emphasis on known facts through the application of the Coase theorem, which justifies the choice in state regulation that carries less social costs. The Kousian theorem of social costs gained its fame by refuting the absolute necessity of prohibiting harmful activities in all cases where harm is established. It turns out that it is not always necessary to fight malicious activity, but only when the implement…
Legal Integration in the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union
The author studies the communitarian and conventional models of legal integration used in the European Union (EU) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), respectively. The purpose of this comparative legal analysis is to determine unique features reflecting differences between these models. Particular focus is on the examination of legal acts of public bodies of the EU and the EAEU — their legal nature, place, role and the characteristics of thei…
No prominent works on this page.
Legal Integration in the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union
The author studies the communitarian and conventional models of legal integration used in the European Union (EU) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), respectively. The purpose of this comparative legal analysis is to determine unique features reflecting differences between these models. Particular focus is on the examination of legal acts of public bodies of the EU and the EAEU — their legal nature, place, role and the characteristics of thei…
Greenhouse Regulation
In my research, I propose to place new emphasis on known facts through the application of the Coase theorem, which justifies the choice in state regulation that carries less social costs. The Kousian theorem of social costs gained its fame by refuting the absolute necessity of prohibiting harmful activities in all cases where harm is established. It turns out that it is not always necessary to fight malicious activity, but only when the implement…
The Trans-Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project
This article examines the production and reproduction of the same arguments made by the Crown in consultations with Indigenous peoples over a controversial resource development project in Canada. To explain the stability of the Crown’s reasoning in consultations with Indigenous communities on Trans-Mountain Pipeline Expansion project (TM), I integrate the path dependence concept with the theory of motivated reasoning while keeping the analytical …
Dominant Discourse in Indigenous Consultations
In Canada, consulting with Indigenous communities over recourse projects, the Crown sometimes avoids critical engagement with them, holding to the same arguments and counterarguments through regulatory and hearing stages. Such hollow moves, produced under the Crown’s rules, become embedded in the dominant argumentative discourse and pass unnoticed. To detect them, I apply Argument Continuities ( ac s) – a new category of argumentative discourse a…
Advancing critical discourse analysis of Indigenous consultations
The paper conducts the critical discourse analysis of Indigenous consultation reports with the help of Argument Continuity, a brand-new critical discourse analysis category. Argument Continuity is a set of the same arguments and counterarguments repeatedly produced/reproduced by the institutionally dominant arguer through an adversarial reasoning process to dismiss opposing arguments without reflecting upon their merits. Argument Continuity is co…
“Deliberative Context” Is not the Whole Story of Deliberative Reasoning
Political science (5 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Indigenous (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Economics (3 works) · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 works) · Adversarial system (2 works) · Argumentative (2 works)