Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Iliana Krapova

Biographic Data

ID5098103
NAMEIliana Krapova
GIVEN NAMESIliana
FAMILY NAMEKrapova
SIGNATUREKRAPOVA I
AFFILIATIONSCa' Foscari University of Venice
ORCID0000-0002-7682-6787
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS10
AUTHOR COUNT6
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2006
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
H-INDEX1
  • Notes on the multiple ambiguity of Bulgarian mnogo

    Open Access•Iliana Krapova, Guglielmo Cinque•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2020

    This paper discusses the ambiguity of the Bulgarian quantity word mnogo and argues that it is not an intensifier stricto sensu, although it can also have such a usage. Comparing mnogo with its Italian counterparts troppo, tanto, and molto, we show that it corresponds more precisely to Italian tanto (English much), which can be modified by overt intensifiers like così (così tanto) or silent ones like molto/troppo (tanto), etc. (cf. English so/very…

  • Studi di linguistica slava

    Open Access•Iliana Krapova, Svetlana Slavkova et al.•BOOK•Studi di linguistica slava•2019

    I contributi raccolti nel presente volume delineano lo stato dell’arte delle ricerche di linguistica slava svolte recentemente nell’ambito della slavistica italiana. I saggi sono dedicati a temi di morfologia, sintassi, semantica, lessicologia, pragmatica, sociolinguistica e didattica delle lingue slave, in ottica contrastiva, sincronica o diacronica, secondo quadri teorici e approcci metodologici di scuole e tradizioni diverse. La grande varietà…

  • Genitive-Dative Syncretism in the History of the Bulgarian Language. Towards an Analysis

    Open Access•Iliana Krapova, Tsvetana Dimitrova•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2016

    In this article, we trace the diachronic phases of so-called genitive-dative syncretism in Old Bulgarian, a phenomenon which marks the beginning of the process of disintegration of the Case system in the history of Bulgarian. We base our research on a corpus study (comprising the texts of Codex Marianus, Codex Zographensis and Codex Suprasliensis) and we show, after a careful examination of the available syntactic positions for the Genitive and t…

  • The Nominal Structure in Slavic and Beyond

    Iliana Krapova, Guglielmo Cinque et al.•BOOK•The nominal structure in Slavic…•2013

    The contributions in this volume shed new light on the discussion of whether the DP hypothesis applies universally or not. The issue is prominent not only for Slavic languages. Drawing on evidence from many other languages, Greek, East Asian, and Basque among them, the book has important implications for answering fundamental questions about the nature of definiteness and quantification.

  • Bulgarian relative and factive clauses with an invariant complementizer

    Open Access•Iliyana Krapova, Iliana Krapova•ARTICLE•Lingua•2010•Cited by: 10•References: 25

  • Ancora sul raddoppiamento dell’oggetto in bulgaro

    Open Access•Iliana Krapova•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2006

    Clitic Reduplication in Bulgarian Revisited The paper discusses the reduplication of direct and indirect objects with a clitic pronoun in modern Bulgarian. It is argued that the so-called Clitic Doubling, as traditional grammar labels it, is not a unitary phenomenon. Instead, there exist 5 different constructions with well-defined syntactic and pragmatic properties: (1) as for Topic; (2) Hanging Topic o Nominativus pendens; (2) Clitic Left Disloc…

  • Bulgarian relative and factive clauses with an invariant complementizer

    Open Access•Iliyana Krapova, Iliana Krapova•ARTICLE•Lingua•2010•Cited by: 10•References: 25

  • Ancora sul raddoppiamento dell’oggetto in bulgaro

    Open Access•Iliana Krapova•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2006

    Clitic Reduplication in Bulgarian Revisited The paper discusses the reduplication of direct and indirect objects with a clitic pronoun in modern Bulgarian. It is argued that the so-called Clitic Doubling, as traditional grammar labels it, is not a unitary phenomenon. Instead, there exist 5 different constructions with well-defined syntactic and pragmatic properties: (1) as for Topic; (2) Hanging Topic o Nominativus pendens; (2) Clitic Left Disloc…

  • Bulgarian relative and factive clauses with an invariant complementizer

    Open Access•Iliyana Krapova, Iliana Krapova•ARTICLE•Lingua•2010•Cited by: 10•References: 25

  • The Nominal Structure in Slavic and Beyond

    Iliana Krapova, Guglielmo Cinque et al.•BOOK•The nominal structure in Slavic…•2013

    The contributions in this volume shed new light on the discussion of whether the DP hypothesis applies universally or not. The issue is prominent not only for Slavic languages. Drawing on evidence from many other languages, Greek, East Asian, and Basque among them, the book has important implications for answering fundamental questions about the nature of definiteness and quantification.

  • Genitive-Dative Syncretism in the History of the Bulgarian Language. Towards an Analysis

    Open Access•Iliana Krapova, Tsvetana Dimitrova•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2016

    In this article, we trace the diachronic phases of so-called genitive-dative syncretism in Old Bulgarian, a phenomenon which marks the beginning of the process of disintegration of the Case system in the history of Bulgarian. We base our research on a corpus study (comprising the texts of Codex Marianus, Codex Zographensis and Codex Suprasliensis) and we show, after a careful examination of the available syntactic positions for the Genitive and t…

  • Studi di linguistica slava

    Open Access•Iliana Krapova, Svetlana Slavkova et al.•BOOK•Studi di linguistica slava•2019

    I contributi raccolti nel presente volume delineano lo stato dell’arte delle ricerche di linguistica slava svolte recentemente nell’ambito della slavistica italiana. I saggi sono dedicati a temi di morfologia, sintassi, semantica, lessicologia, pragmatica, sociolinguistica e didattica delle lingue slave, in ottica contrastiva, sincronica o diacronica, secondo quadri teorici e approcci metodologici di scuole e tradizioni diverse. La grande varietà…

  • Notes on the multiple ambiguity of Bulgarian mnogo

    Open Access•Iliana Krapova, Guglielmo Cinque•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2020

    This paper discusses the ambiguity of the Bulgarian quantity word mnogo and argues that it is not an intensifier stricto sensu, although it can also have such a usage. Comparing mnogo with its Italian counterparts troppo, tanto, and molto, we show that it corresponds more precisely to Italian tanto (English much), which can be modified by overt intensifiers like così (così tanto) or silent ones like molto/troppo (tanto), etc. (cf. English so/very…

Linguistics (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Bulgarian (4 works) · History (3 works) · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (3 works) · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 works) · Ambiguity (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Attributive (1 works) · Clitic (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae