Nancy K Levene
Biographic Data
| ID | 5177552 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Nancy K Levene |
| GIVEN NAMES | Nancy K |
| FAMILY NAME | Levene |
| SIGNATURE | LEVENE N K |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2006 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2006 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Reply to José Ignacio Cabezón
Journal Article Reply to José Ignacio Cabezón Get access Nancy K. Levene Nancy K. Levene Indiana University, Bloomington Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume 74, Issue 1, March 2006, Pages 105–106, https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfj020 Published: 11 January 2006
Sources of History
In the contemporary human sciences in general, and the study of religion in particular, history is a discourse of immense power and reach. But its role is paradoxical, for although it is charged with dissolving the uniqueness or transcendence of any given point of view, its own supremacy is often taken for granted, even in the post-Foucauldian world where it is common to attack the objectivist aspirations of historicist discourse. What I call for…
Response to Flood
GAVIN FLOOD CALLS FOR religious studies to become more open to “religiously based standpoints,” in other words, to “traditions’ self-inquiry within a framework of rational discourse.” His paper offers three main reasons for this. The first reason is that such standpoints greatly facilitate comparison, because, unlike reductive accounts of religion, which leave nothing substantive left to compare, and area-specific accounts, which are reluctant to…
Sources of History
In the contemporary human sciences in general, and the study of religion in particular, history is a discourse of immense power and reach. But its role is paradoxical, for although it is charged with dissolving the uniqueness or transcendence of any given point of view, its own supremacy is often taken for granted, even in the post-Foucauldian world where it is common to attack the objectivist aspirations of historicist discourse. What I call for…
Reply to José Ignacio Cabezón
Journal Article Reply to José Ignacio Cabezón Get access Nancy K. Levene Nancy K. Levene Indiana University, Bloomington Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume 74, Issue 1, March 2006, Pages 105–106, https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfj020 Published: 11 January 2006
Sources of History
In the contemporary human sciences in general, and the study of religion in particular, history is a discourse of immense power and reach. But its role is paradoxical, for although it is charged with dissolving the uniqueness or transcendence of any given point of view, its own supremacy is often taken for granted, even in the post-Foucauldian world where it is common to attack the objectivist aspirations of historicist discourse. What I call for…
Response to Flood
GAVIN FLOOD CALLS FOR religious studies to become more open to “religiously based standpoints,” in other words, to “traditions’ self-inquiry within a framework of rational discourse.” His paper offers three main reasons for this. The first reason is that such standpoints greatly facilitate comparison, because, unlike reductive accounts of religion, which leave nothing substantive left to compare, and area-specific accounts, which are reluctant to…
Study and Philosophy of Religion (3 works) · Art (2 works) · Anthropological Studies and Insights (1 work) · Art history (1 work) · Classics (1 work) · Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 work) · Environmental ethics (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · Flood myth (1 work) · History (1 work)