Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

WILLIAM R FARMER

Biographic Data

ID5178649
NAMEWILLIAM R FARMER
GIVEN NAMESWILLIAM R
FAMILY NAMEFARMER
SIGNATUREFARMER W R
AFFILIATIONSUrsuline Academy of Dallas
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1957
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1990
H-INDEX0
  • The Passion Prediction Passages and the Synoptic Problem

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•New Testament Studies•1990

    Some scholars continue to argue on compositional grounds that the Two-Document Hypothesis is to be preferred to the view that Luke first copied Matthew and that Mark then copied Matthew and Luke. The best way to answer such claims is to take a test case and discuss the matter in detail. It will be argued that the evidence indicates that there are serious difficulties with the view that Matthew and Luke independently copied Mark, a view essential …

  • Jesus and the Gospel

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER, Adela Yarbro Collins•ARTICLE•Theology Today•1983

  • Modern Developments of Griesbach's Hypothesis

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•New Testament Studies•1977

    To refer to ‘modern developments’ of Griesbach's hypothesis makes clear that the present revival of interest in Griesbach's work is not simply an uncritical return to the past. For example, Griesbach accepted the traditional view of Augustine that Luke used Matthew even as he broke with tradition in affirming that Mark came after Luke as well as after Matthew. To the extent that Griesbach assumed Luke's use of Matthew while never discussing the r…

  • Biblical Studies

    WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•Journal of the American Academy…•1971

    Journal Article BIBLICAL STUDIES Get access The Tendencies of the Synoptic Tradition. (Society for New Testament Studies, Monograph Series 9.) By E. P. SANDERS. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1969. xiv+328 pages. $14.50. WILLIAM R. FARMER WILLIAM R. FARMER Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume XXXIX, Issue 4, December 1971, Pages 530–532, https://doi.org…

  • ‘The Lachmann Fallacy’

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•New Testament Studies•1968

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Notes on a Literary and Form-Critical Ananysis of Some of the Synoptic Material Peculiar to Luke

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•New Testament Studies•1962

    We may begin our analysis of the synoptic tradition peculiar to Luke with a study of one of its most important component parts, namely that preserved in the fifteenth chapter. The whole of this chapter constitutes a single literary unit, whose beginning and end are well defined and whose internal structure, while not uniform, is perfectly self-consistent. The introduction to this literary unit points to the ‘grumbling’ of the Pharisees and Scribe…

  • Judas, Simon and Athronges

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•New Testament Studies•1958

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Soundings at Khirbet Wadi ez-Zaraniq

    WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•Bulletin of the American Schools…•1957

No prominent works on this page.

  • Soundings at Khirbet Wadi ez-Zaraniq

    WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•Bulletin of the American Schools…•1957

  • Judas, Simon and Athronges

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•New Testament Studies•1958

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Notes on a Literary and Form-Critical Ananysis of Some of the Synoptic Material Peculiar to Luke

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•New Testament Studies•1962

    We may begin our analysis of the synoptic tradition peculiar to Luke with a study of one of its most important component parts, namely that preserved in the fifteenth chapter. The whole of this chapter constitutes a single literary unit, whose beginning and end are well defined and whose internal structure, while not uniform, is perfectly self-consistent. The introduction to this literary unit points to the ‘grumbling’ of the Pharisees and Scribe…

  • ‘The Lachmann Fallacy’

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•New Testament Studies•1968

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Biblical Studies

    WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•Journal of the American Academy…•1971

    Journal Article BIBLICAL STUDIES Get access The Tendencies of the Synoptic Tradition. (Society for New Testament Studies, Monograph Series 9.) By E. P. SANDERS. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1969. xiv+328 pages. $14.50. WILLIAM R. FARMER WILLIAM R. FARMER Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume XXXIX, Issue 4, December 1971, Pages 530–532, https://doi.org…

  • Modern Developments of Griesbach's Hypothesis

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•New Testament Studies•1977

    To refer to ‘modern developments’ of Griesbach's hypothesis makes clear that the present revival of interest in Griesbach's work is not simply an uncritical return to the past. For example, Griesbach accepted the traditional view of Augustine that Luke used Matthew even as he broke with tradition in affirming that Mark came after Luke as well as after Matthew. To the extent that Griesbach assumed Luke's use of Matthew while never discussing the r…

  • Jesus and the Gospel

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER, Adela Yarbro Collins•ARTICLE•Theology Today•1983

  • The Passion Prediction Passages and the Synoptic Problem

    Open Access•WILLIAM R FARMER•ARTICLE•New Testament Studies•1990

    Some scholars continue to argue on compositional grounds that the Two-Document Hypothesis is to be preferred to the view that Luke first copied Matthew and that Mark then copied Matthew and Luke. The best way to answer such claims is to take a test case and discuss the matter in detail. It will be argued that the evidence indicates that there are serious difficulties with the view that Matthew and Luke independently copied Mark, a view essential …

Philosophy (7 works) · Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 works) · History (5 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Historical and Linguistic Studies (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 works) · Library science (2 works) · Theology (2 works) · African history and culture analysis (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae