Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Peter Jonkers

Biographic Data

ID5191925
NAMEPeter Jonkers
GIVEN NAMESPeter
FAMILY NAMEJonkers
SIGNATUREJONKERS P
AFFILIATIONSTilburg University
ORCID0000-0002-5996-2891
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT4
EDITOR COUNT1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2014
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX0
  • Je veux reprendre ma liberté ! Une perspective hégélienne sur le contrecoup socio-politique de la pandémie

    Peter Jonkers, Jacob Dahl Rendtorff et al.•ARTICLE•Diogène•2022

    Cet article se concentre sur le contrecoup sociopolitique de la pandémie de Covid-19 et utilise le cadre de la philosophie de Hegel pour l’analyser. Premièrement, l’article étudie les protestations de principe de diverses personnes contre les mesures imposées par l’État pour contrôler la pandémie. Sur la base de l’analyse de Hegel de la double reconnaissance entre l’État et ses membres, sur laquelle reposent les démocraties modernes, on soutient …

  • Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality

    Peter Jonkers, Oliver J Wiertz•BOOK•Religious Truth and Identity in…•2019

  • Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality

    Oliver J Wiertz, Peter Jonkers•BOOK•Religious Truth and Identity in…•2019

  • How to Respond to Conflicts Over Value Pluralism

    Open Access•Peter Jonkers•ARTICLE•Journal of Nationalism Memory &…•2019•References: 9

    This paper starts with arguing that the main reason why value pluralism has become conflictual is that it challenges people’s socio-cultural identity. The next section gives a summary of recent sociological research on socio-cultural tensions and conflicts in the Netherlands and Europe. They are closely linked to “globalization issues,” such as cosmopolitism, immigration, and cultural integration. This shows that the prediction of the modernizati…

  • The Interest of Reason Is to Go Without G od. J acobi's Polemic Against Philosophical Theology

    Open Access•Peter Jonkers•ARTICLE•Journal of Religious History•2014

    J acobi's polemics against philosophical theology is meant to show that neither S pinoza, nor K ant, nor F ichte nor S chelling have been able to think G od as a person, that is as a free, intelligent being. In order to elucidate J acobi's position I focus on two less well‐known texts of his, viz., A Few Comments Concerning Pious Fraud (1788) and Of Divine Things and Their Revelation (1811). In the second section I situate two key philosophical t…

No prominent works on this page.

  • The Interest of Reason Is to Go Without G od. J acobi's Polemic Against Philosophical Theology

    Open Access•Peter Jonkers•ARTICLE•Journal of Religious History•2014

    J acobi's polemics against philosophical theology is meant to show that neither S pinoza, nor K ant, nor F ichte nor S chelling have been able to think G od as a person, that is as a free, intelligent being. In order to elucidate J acobi's position I focus on two less well‐known texts of his, viz., A Few Comments Concerning Pious Fraud (1788) and Of Divine Things and Their Revelation (1811). In the second section I situate two key philosophical t…

  • Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality

    Peter Jonkers, Oliver J Wiertz•BOOK•Religious Truth and Identity in…•2019

  • Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality

    Oliver J Wiertz, Peter Jonkers•BOOK•Religious Truth and Identity in…•2019

  • How to Respond to Conflicts Over Value Pluralism

    Open Access•Peter Jonkers•ARTICLE•Journal of Nationalism Memory &…•2019•References: 9

    This paper starts with arguing that the main reason why value pluralism has become conflictual is that it challenges people’s socio-cultural identity. The next section gives a summary of recent sociological research on socio-cultural tensions and conflicts in the Netherlands and Europe. They are closely linked to “globalization issues,” such as cosmopolitism, immigration, and cultural integration. This shows that the prediction of the modernizati…

  • Je veux reprendre ma liberté ! Une perspective hégélienne sur le contrecoup socio-politique de la pandémie

    Peter Jonkers, Jacob Dahl Rendtorff et al.•ARTICLE•Diogène•2022

    Cet article se concentre sur le contrecoup sociopolitique de la pandémie de Covid-19 et utilise le cadre de la philosophie de Hegel pour l’analyser. Premièrement, l’article étudie les protestations de principe de diverses personnes contre les mesures imposées par l’État pour contrôler la pandémie. Sur la base de l’analyse de Hegel de la double reconnaissance entre l’État et ses membres, sur laquelle reposent les démocraties modernes, on soutient …

Philosophy (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Comparative Religion (2 works) · Identification (Religion) (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Religion (2 works) · Religious aspects (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae