Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jase Sitton

Biographic Data

ID5218110
NAMEJase Sitton
GIVEN NAMESJase
FAMILY NAMESitton
SIGNATURESITTON J
AFFILIATIONSDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lyle School of Engineering Southern Methodist University Dallas Texas USA
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS4
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX2
  • Static penetration assessment of stone weapon tip geometry metrics and comparison of static and dynamic penetration depths

    Open Access•Jase Sitton, Jase D Sitton et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeometry•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 54

    Many factors governed the penetration efficacy of prehistoric projectile weaponry. Archaeologists broadly focus their efforts on understanding the effect of stone weapon tips because these specimens are often the only part of the weapon system that survives in the archaeological record. The tip cross‐sectional area (TCSA) and perimeter (TCSP) of stone weapon tips have been shown to correlate with target penetration depth. Here, using results from…

  • Comparison of four ballistic and thrusting target materials: An experimental and Bayesian approach using static testing of stone and steel arrow tips

    Open Access•Damon Mullen, Jase Sitton et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeometry•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 74

    Researchers use a variety of target materials, and sometimes combinations of materials, in their archaeological experiments to examine thrust‐spear or projectile penetration, impact angle, durability, and other issues involving prehistoric hunting weaponry. This variety of target materials is beneficial to archaeological science in several ways, but it may also hinder the comparison of results because many of these target materials do not necessa…

  • Tip cross-sectional geometry predicts the penetration depth of stone-tipped projectiles

    Open Access•Jase Sitton, Jase D Sitton et al.•ARTICLE•Scientific Reports•2020

    Understanding prehistoric projectile weaponry performance is fundamental to unraveling past humans’ survival and the evolution of technology. One important debate involves how deeply stone-tipped projectiles penetrate a target. Theoretically, all things being equal, projectiles with smaller tip cross-sectional geometries should penetrate deeper into a target than projectiles with larger tip cross-sectional geometries. Yet, previous experiments ha…

  • Static penetration assessment of stone weapon tip geometry metrics and comparison of static and dynamic penetration depths

    Open Access•Jase Sitton, Jase D Sitton et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeometry•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 54

    Many factors governed the penetration efficacy of prehistoric projectile weaponry. Archaeologists broadly focus their efforts on understanding the effect of stone weapon tips because these specimens are often the only part of the weapon system that survives in the archaeological record. The tip cross‐sectional area (TCSA) and perimeter (TCSP) of stone weapon tips have been shown to correlate with target penetration depth. Here, using results from…

  • Comparison of four ballistic and thrusting target materials: An experimental and Bayesian approach using static testing of stone and steel arrow tips

    Open Access•Damon Mullen, Jase Sitton et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeometry•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 74

    Researchers use a variety of target materials, and sometimes combinations of materials, in their archaeological experiments to examine thrust‐spear or projectile penetration, impact angle, durability, and other issues involving prehistoric hunting weaponry. This variety of target materials is beneficial to archaeological science in several ways, but it may also hinder the comparison of results because many of these target materials do not necessa…

  • Tip cross-sectional geometry predicts the penetration depth of stone-tipped projectiles

    Open Access•Jase Sitton, Jase D Sitton et al.•ARTICLE•Scientific Reports•2020

    Understanding prehistoric projectile weaponry performance is fundamental to unraveling past humans’ survival and the evolution of technology. One important debate involves how deeply stone-tipped projectiles penetrate a target. Theoretically, all things being equal, projectiles with smaller tip cross-sectional geometries should penetrate deeper into a target than projectiles with larger tip cross-sectional geometries. Yet, previous experiments ha…

  • Static penetration assessment of stone weapon tip geometry metrics and comparison of static and dynamic penetration depths

    Open Access•Jase Sitton, Jase D Sitton et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeometry•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 54

    Many factors governed the penetration efficacy of prehistoric projectile weaponry. Archaeologists broadly focus their efforts on understanding the effect of stone weapon tips because these specimens are often the only part of the weapon system that survives in the archaeological record. The tip cross‐sectional area (TCSA) and perimeter (TCSP) of stone weapon tips have been shown to correlate with target penetration depth. Here, using results from…

  • Comparison of four ballistic and thrusting target materials: An experimental and Bayesian approach using static testing of stone and steel arrow tips

    Open Access•Damon Mullen, Jase Sitton et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeometry•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 74

    Researchers use a variety of target materials, and sometimes combinations of materials, in their archaeological experiments to examine thrust‐spear or projectile penetration, impact angle, durability, and other issues involving prehistoric hunting weaponry. This variety of target materials is beneficial to archaeological science in several ways, but it may also hinder the comparison of results because many of these target materials do not necessa…

Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 works) · Geology (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Operations research (3 works) · Penetration (warfare) (3 works) · Projectile (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (2 works) · Geology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae