Cornelia Ilie
Biographic Data
| ID | 523361 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Cornelia Ilie |
| GIVEN NAMES | Cornelia |
| FAMILY NAME | Ilie |
| SIGNATURE | ILIE C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Malmö University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6220-0150 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 25 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 168 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 20 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 5 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1996 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 7 |
Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and Counter-Manipulation in Times of Crisis
Spotlighting case studies of manipulation practices at the onset of the Covid-19 crisis in different countries and socio-political circumstances, the authors expose context-specific discourse and argumentation strategies of 'infodemics’ (misleading information and fake news), public policy mismanagement, deceptive online and offline communication tactics, and conspiracy narratives, which end up disrupting community social cohesion. In addition to…
Dialogue and dialogic perspectives on actions, interactions and practices across contexts
How to Argue with Questions and Answers: Argumentation Strategies in Parliamentary Deliberation
While apparently designed to request information, parliamentary questions are the most challenging and face-threatening acts, used argumentatively by opposition members of parliament (MPs) to confront and attack government MPs, and especially the Prime Minister (PM) in the notoriously adversarial Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs). By contextually, discursively and rhetorically articulating varying degrees of relevance and persuasiveness, question…
Meta-questions and meta-answers: The interplay of metadialogic practices in PMQs
Discussion, dispute or controversy: Paradigms of conflict-driven parliamentary practices
As parliamentary debates increasingly display rising levels of political conflict, the polarized and aggressive polemical exchanges in Prime Minister’s Questions are impacting the current agenda-setting and consequently public perceptions and assessments. To get a deeper understanding of the discourse strategies and argumentation practices used in the conflict-driven interaction between opposition MPs (particularly the Leader of the Opposition) a…
International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction
Pragmatics and Its Interfaces
Behave yourself, woman: Patterns of gender discrimination and sexist stereotyping in parliamentary interaction
After a record number of women were elected to the House of Commons in 1997, many incidents of sexism and abusive behaviour were reported. The aim of this article is twofold: on the one hand, to scrutinize the mechanisms and effects of sexist discrimination and stereotyping of women MPs in the House of Commons; on the other, to identify the strategies used by female (and male) MPs to subvert discriminatory representations, and to counteract gende…
Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse
Preview this article: Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse, Page 1 of 1 /docserver/preview/fulltext/jlp.00017.edi-1.gif
Parliament and Parliamentarism
Parliamentary theory, practices, discourses, and institutions constitute a distinctively European contribution to modern politics. Taking a broad historical perspective, this cross-disciplinary, innovative, and rigorous collection locates the essence of parliamentarism in four key aspects—deliberation, representation, responsibility, and sovereignty—and explores the different ways in which they have been contested, reshaped, and implemented in a …
Parliament and Parliamentarism: A Comparative History of a European Concept
Parliaments and parliamentarism: A comparative history of disputes about a European concept
Parliamentary theory, practices, discourses and institutions constitute a distinctively European contribution to modern politics. Taking a broad historical perspective, this cross-disciplinary, innovative and rigorous collection locates the essence of parliamentarism in four key aspects - deliberation, representation, responsibility and sovereignty - and explores the different ways in which they have been contested, reshaped and implemented in a …
Gendering confrontational rhetoric: Discursive disorder in the British and Swedish parliaments
Parliaments are basically adversarial settings that instantiate the polarization of political power. In debating the pros and cons of available alternatives, parliamentarians are supposed to observe convention-based institutional norms and regulations. However, in critical moments these rules are strategically violated to achieve political goals. Gender-related asymmetries in parliamentary power balance tend to emerge in disorderly parliamentary …
The Gender Divide in Election Campaign Interviews: Questioning Barack Obama and Calling into Question Hillary Clinton
Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory is an international refereed open access journal, which publishes contributions on the transdisciplinary study of concepts. In classical rhetoric, ‘redescription’ refers to a rhetorical move that alters the use of a concept in one respect or another. The journal draws attention to conceptual moves within political theory, conceptual history and feminist thought, and highlig…
Analytical perspectives on parliamentary and extra-parliamentary discourses
Pseudo-parliamentary discourse in a Communist dictatorship: Dissenter Pârvulescu vs. dictator Ceauşescu
Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag
Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates
Oral metadiscourse is envisaged in the present study as a set of rhetorically structured communicative and interactional strategies used by speakers to signal, highlight, mitigate, or cancel parts of their ongoing discourse and their varying relevance to different addressees and/or audience members. Parliamentary metadiscursive strategies are typical manifestations of MPs’ joint negotiations of the degree of directness, explicitness, appropriaten…
Language and Ideology: Volume 2: descriptive cognitive approaches
Together with its sister volume on Theoretical Cognitive Approaches, this volume explores the contribution which cognitive linguistics can make to the identification and analysis of overt and hidden ideologies. This volume shows that descriptive tools which cognitive linguistics developed for the analysis of language-in-use are highly efficient for the analysis of ideologies as well. Amongst them are the concept of grounding and the speaker’s dei…
Language and ideology
Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows
Cliché‐based metadiscursive argumentation in the Houses of Parliament
This article puts forward a discourse‐analytical and argumentative framework for the interpretation of clichés used in parliamentary debates. The analysis of their argumentative functions is based on their metadiscursive use and institutional evaluation provided by the cliché‐users, namely British Members of Parliament. Metadiscursively introduced clichés undergo a double evaluation by their utterers: evaluation of the status of the cliché as a d…
Question-response argumentation in talk shows
The Ideological Remapping of Semantic Roles in Totalitarian Discourse, or, How to Paint White Roses Red
This article proposes a pragmatic analysis in terms of semantic roles of the ideologically based linguistic manipulation underlying the rhetoric of totalitarian discourse with special reference to dictator Nicolae Ceauşescu's speeches in communist România. The analysis focuses on the linguistic violations that consist in demoting the Agent role, normally associated with humans, to the status of Instrument or Patient semantic role, while promoting…
What Else can I Tell You? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts
What else can I tell you? : a pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative acts
Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates
Oral metadiscourse is envisaged in the present study as a set of rhetorically structured communicative and interactional strategies used by speakers to signal, highlight, mitigate, or cancel parts of their ongoing discourse and their varying relevance to different addressees and/or audience members. Parliamentary metadiscursive strategies are typical manifestations of MPs’ joint negotiations of the degree of directness, explicitness, appropriaten…
Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows
Question-response argumentation in talk shows
Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag
Gendering confrontational rhetoric: Discursive disorder in the British and Swedish parliaments
Parliaments are basically adversarial settings that instantiate the polarization of political power. In debating the pros and cons of available alternatives, parliamentarians are supposed to observe convention-based institutional norms and regulations. However, in critical moments these rules are strategically violated to achieve political goals. Gender-related asymmetries in parliamentary power balance tend to emerge in disorderly parliamentary …
Cliché‐based metadiscursive argumentation in the Houses of Parliament
This article puts forward a discourse‐analytical and argumentative framework for the interpretation of clichés used in parliamentary debates. The analysis of their argumentative functions is based on their metadiscursive use and institutional evaluation provided by the cliché‐users, namely British Members of Parliament. Metadiscursively introduced clichés undergo a double evaluation by their utterers: evaluation of the status of the cliché as a d…
The Ideological Remapping of Semantic Roles in Totalitarian Discourse, or, How to Paint White Roses Red
This article proposes a pragmatic analysis in terms of semantic roles of the ideologically based linguistic manipulation underlying the rhetoric of totalitarian discourse with special reference to dictator Nicolae Ceauşescu's speeches in communist România. The analysis focuses on the linguistic violations that consist in demoting the Agent role, normally associated with humans, to the status of Instrument or Patient semantic role, while promoting…
Analytical perspectives on parliamentary and extra-parliamentary discourses
Behave yourself, woman: Patterns of gender discrimination and sexist stereotyping in parliamentary interaction
After a record number of women were elected to the House of Commons in 1997, many incidents of sexism and abusive behaviour were reported. The aim of this article is twofold: on the one hand, to scrutinize the mechanisms and effects of sexist discrimination and stereotyping of women MPs in the House of Commons; on the other, to identify the strategies used by female (and male) MPs to subvert discriminatory representations, and to counteract gende…
Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse
Preview this article: Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse, Page 1 of 1 /docserver/preview/fulltext/jlp.00017.edi-1.gif
Meta-questions and meta-answers: The interplay of metadialogic practices in PMQs
How to Argue with Questions and Answers: Argumentation Strategies in Parliamentary Deliberation
While apparently designed to request information, parliamentary questions are the most challenging and face-threatening acts, used argumentatively by opposition members of parliament (MPs) to confront and attack government MPs, and especially the Prime Minister (PM) in the notoriously adversarial Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs). By contextually, discursively and rhetorically articulating varying degrees of relevance and persuasiveness, question…
Pseudo-parliamentary discourse in a Communist dictatorship: Dissenter Pârvulescu vs. dictator Ceauşescu
What Else can I Tell You? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts
What else can I tell you? : a pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative acts
The Ideological Remapping of Semantic Roles in Totalitarian Discourse, or, How to Paint White Roses Red
This article proposes a pragmatic analysis in terms of semantic roles of the ideologically based linguistic manipulation underlying the rhetoric of totalitarian discourse with special reference to dictator Nicolae Ceauşescu's speeches in communist România. The analysis focuses on the linguistic violations that consist in demoting the Agent role, normally associated with humans, to the status of Instrument or Patient semantic role, while promoting…
Question-response argumentation in talk shows
Cliché‐based metadiscursive argumentation in the Houses of Parliament
This article puts forward a discourse‐analytical and argumentative framework for the interpretation of clichés used in parliamentary debates. The analysis of their argumentative functions is based on their metadiscursive use and institutional evaluation provided by the cliché‐users, namely British Members of Parliament. Metadiscursively introduced clichés undergo a double evaluation by their utterers: evaluation of the status of the cliché as a d…
Language and Ideology: Volume 2: descriptive cognitive approaches
Together with its sister volume on Theoretical Cognitive Approaches, this volume explores the contribution which cognitive linguistics can make to the identification and analysis of overt and hidden ideologies. This volume shows that descriptive tools which cognitive linguistics developed for the analysis of language-in-use are highly efficient for the analysis of ideologies as well. Amongst them are the concept of grounding and the speaker’s dei…
Language and ideology
Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows
Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates
Oral metadiscourse is envisaged in the present study as a set of rhetorically structured communicative and interactional strategies used by speakers to signal, highlight, mitigate, or cancel parts of their ongoing discourse and their varying relevance to different addressees and/or audience members. Parliamentary metadiscursive strategies are typical manifestations of MPs’ joint negotiations of the degree of directness, explicitness, appropriaten…
Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag
Analytical perspectives on parliamentary and extra-parliamentary discourses
Pseudo-parliamentary discourse in a Communist dictatorship: Dissenter Pârvulescu vs. dictator Ceauşescu
The Gender Divide in Election Campaign Interviews: Questioning Barack Obama and Calling into Question Hillary Clinton
Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory is an international refereed open access journal, which publishes contributions on the transdisciplinary study of concepts. In classical rhetoric, ‘redescription’ refers to a rhetorical move that alters the use of a concept in one respect or another. The journal draws attention to conceptual moves within political theory, conceptual history and feminist thought, and highlig…
Gendering confrontational rhetoric: Discursive disorder in the British and Swedish parliaments
Parliaments are basically adversarial settings that instantiate the polarization of political power. In debating the pros and cons of available alternatives, parliamentarians are supposed to observe convention-based institutional norms and regulations. However, in critical moments these rules are strategically violated to achieve political goals. Gender-related asymmetries in parliamentary power balance tend to emerge in disorderly parliamentary …
Parliament and Parliamentarism
Parliamentary theory, practices, discourses, and institutions constitute a distinctively European contribution to modern politics. Taking a broad historical perspective, this cross-disciplinary, innovative, and rigorous collection locates the essence of parliamentarism in four key aspects—deliberation, representation, responsibility, and sovereignty—and explores the different ways in which they have been contested, reshaped, and implemented in a …
Parliament and Parliamentarism: A Comparative History of a European Concept
Parliaments and parliamentarism: A comparative history of disputes about a European concept
Parliamentary theory, practices, discourses and institutions constitute a distinctively European contribution to modern politics. Taking a broad historical perspective, this cross-disciplinary, innovative and rigorous collection locates the essence of parliamentarism in four key aspects - deliberation, representation, responsibility and sovereignty - and explores the different ways in which they have been contested, reshaped and implemented in a …
Pragmatics and Its Interfaces
Behave yourself, woman: Patterns of gender discrimination and sexist stereotyping in parliamentary interaction
After a record number of women were elected to the House of Commons in 1997, many incidents of sexism and abusive behaviour were reported. The aim of this article is twofold: on the one hand, to scrutinize the mechanisms and effects of sexist discrimination and stereotyping of women MPs in the House of Commons; on the other, to identify the strategies used by female (and male) MPs to subvert discriminatory representations, and to counteract gende…
Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse
Preview this article: Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse, Page 1 of 1 /docserver/preview/fulltext/jlp.00017.edi-1.gif
International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction
Discussion, dispute or controversy: Paradigms of conflict-driven parliamentary practices
As parliamentary debates increasingly display rising levels of political conflict, the polarized and aggressive polemical exchanges in Prime Minister’s Questions are impacting the current agenda-setting and consequently public perceptions and assessments. To get a deeper understanding of the discourse strategies and argumentation practices used in the conflict-driven interaction between opposition MPs (particularly the Leader of the Opposition) a…
Dialogue and dialogic perspectives on actions, interactions and practices across contexts
How to Argue with Questions and Answers: Argumentation Strategies in Parliamentary Deliberation
While apparently designed to request information, parliamentary questions are the most challenging and face-threatening acts, used argumentatively by opposition members of parliament (MPs) to confront and attack government MPs, and especially the Prime Minister (PM) in the notoriously adversarial Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs). By contextually, discursively and rhetorically articulating varying degrees of relevance and persuasiveness, question…
Meta-questions and meta-answers: The interplay of metadialogic practices in PMQs
Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and Counter-Manipulation in Times of Crisis
Spotlighting case studies of manipulation practices at the onset of the Covid-19 crisis in different countries and socio-political circumstances, the authors expose context-specific discourse and argumentation strategies of 'infodemics’ (misleading information and fake news), public policy mismanagement, deceptive online and offline communication tactics, and conspiracy narratives, which end up disrupting community social cohesion. In addition to…
Linguistics (17 works) · Political science (16 works) · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (14 works) · Sociology (14 works) · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (13 works) · Politics (13 works) · Law (12 works) · Philosophy (12 works) · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (11 works) · Psychology (11 works)