David H Glass

Biographic Data

ID5237143
NAMEDavid H Glass
GIVEN NAMESDavid H
FAMILY NAMEGlass
SIGNATUREGLASS D H
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Rochester
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS20
WORKS AS AUTHOR7
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1967
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX3

  • Conjunctive Explanations

    Jonah N Schupbach, David H Glass et al.BOOKConjunctive Explanations2023

  • Coherence, Explanation, and Hypothesis Selection

    Open AccessJonah N Schupbach, David H GlassARTICLEThe British Journal for the…2021Cited by: 1References: 23

    This article provides a new approach to inference to the best explanation (IBE) based on a new coherence measure for comparing how well hypotheses explain the evidence. It addresses a number of criticisms of the use of probabilistic measures in this context by Glymour ([2015]), including limitations of earlier work on IBE (Glass [2012]). Computer experiments are used to show that the new approach finds the truth with a high degree of accuracy in …

  • Two-dimensional opinion dynamics in social networks with conflicting beliefs

    Open AccessShuwei Chen, Jonah N Schupbach et al.ARTICLEAI & Society2017

  • Hypothesis Competition beyond Mutual Exclusivity

    Open AccessJonah N Schupbach, David H Gla et al.ARTICLEPhilosophy of Science2017Cited by: 4References: 11

    Competition between scientific hypotheses is not always a matter of mutual exclusivity. Consistent hypotheses can compete to varying degrees either directly or indirectly via a body of evidence. We motivate and defend a particular account of hypothesis competition by showing how it captures these features. Computer simulations of Bayesian inference are used to highlight the limitations of adopting mutual exclusivity as a simplifying assumption to…

  • Inference to the best explanation

    Open AccessJonah N Schupbach, David H GlassARTICLESynthese2012Cited by: 6References: 14

  • Coherence measures and inference to the best explanation

    Open AccessJonah N Schupbach, David H Gla et al.ARTICLESynthese2007Cited by: 9References: 23

  • Amobarbital Sodium and the Effects of Reward and Nonreward in the Amsel Double Runway

    Open AccessJames R Ison, Helen Bohmer Daly et al.ARTICLEPsychological Reports1967

    Rats received 60 trials (Condition I) with 6 pellets reward at the second goal of a double runway and either 6 ( n = 12) or 0 ( n = 12) at the first goal, followed by, for all Ss, 24 trials (Condition II) with 0 reward at the first goal, then 36 trials (Condition III) with 50% reward at the first goal. Half of each reward group received amobarbital sodium (20 mg/kg, IP) and half saline prior to the 6 daily trials. Neither excitatory nor inhibitor…