Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Douglas E Mould

Biographic Data

ID5378053
NAMEDouglas E Mould
GIVEN NAMESDouglas E
FAMILY NAMEMould
SIGNATUREMOULD D E
AFFILIATIONSWichita Clinic
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS17
AUTHOR COUNT7
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1980
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1990
H-INDEX2
  • Data base or data bias

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1990

  • Data base or data bias

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1990

  • A reply to Page: Fraud, pornography, and the Meese Commission

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1990

  • A reply to Page: Fraud, pornography, and the Meese Commission

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1990

  • A reply to Malamuth and Donnerstein and Linz

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•The Journal of Sex Research•1988•Cited by: 2•References: 5

    I beUeve Malamuth's (1988) response to my criticism demonstrates and vaUdates many of the objections I have raised. Considering the issue of sexual arousal, Malamuth sidesteps the first issue. That an average self-reported sex? ual arousal of 50% is compared to other studies in the Uterature is beside the point. Being 50% aroused does not justify labeUng the level as highly To do so misrepresents the actual level and impUes an effect greater than…

  • A critical analysis of recent research on violent erotica

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•The Journal of Sex Research•1988•Cited by: 11•References: 6

  • Neuromuscular aspects of women's orgasms

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•The Journal of Sex Research•1980•Cited by: 4

    Two models of women's orgasm are examined in light of known neuromuscular functioning. It is concluded that both models have difficulties in their formulations concerning the triggering mechanisms of orgasm, and neither model attempts to account for the clonic nature of the response. An alternative model is presented which more fully accounts for the orgasmic response. Theoretical and clinical implications of this new model are discussed

  • A critical analysis of recent research on violent erotica

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•The Journal of Sex Research•1988•Cited by: 11•References: 6

  • Neuromuscular aspects of women's orgasms

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•The Journal of Sex Research•1980•Cited by: 4

    Two models of women's orgasm are examined in light of known neuromuscular functioning. It is concluded that both models have difficulties in their formulations concerning the triggering mechanisms of orgasm, and neither model attempts to account for the clonic nature of the response. An alternative model is presented which more fully accounts for the orgasmic response. Theoretical and clinical implications of this new model are discussed

  • A reply to Malamuth and Donnerstein and Linz

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•The Journal of Sex Research•1988•Cited by: 2•References: 5

    I beUeve Malamuth's (1988) response to my criticism demonstrates and vaUdates many of the objections I have raised. Considering the issue of sexual arousal, Malamuth sidesteps the first issue. That an average self-reported sex? ual arousal of 50% is compared to other studies in the Uterature is beside the point. Being 50% aroused does not justify labeUng the level as highly To do so misrepresents the actual level and impUes an effect greater than…

  • Neuromuscular aspects of women's orgasms

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•The Journal of Sex Research•1980•Cited by: 4

    Two models of women's orgasm are examined in light of known neuromuscular functioning. It is concluded that both models have difficulties in their formulations concerning the triggering mechanisms of orgasm, and neither model attempts to account for the clonic nature of the response. An alternative model is presented which more fully accounts for the orgasmic response. Theoretical and clinical implications of this new model are discussed

  • A reply to Malamuth and Donnerstein and Linz

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•The Journal of Sex Research•1988•Cited by: 2•References: 5

    I beUeve Malamuth's (1988) response to my criticism demonstrates and vaUdates many of the objections I have raised. Considering the issue of sexual arousal, Malamuth sidesteps the first issue. That an average self-reported sex? ual arousal of 50% is compared to other studies in the Uterature is beside the point. Being 50% aroused does not justify labeUng the level as highly To do so misrepresents the actual level and impUes an effect greater than…

  • A critical analysis of recent research on violent erotica

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•The Journal of Sex Research•1988•Cited by: 11•References: 6

  • Data base or data bias

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1990

  • Data base or data bias

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1990

  • A reply to Page: Fraud, pornography, and the Meese Commission

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1990

  • A reply to Page: Fraud, pornography, and the Meese Commission

    Douglas E Mould•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1990

Psychology (7 works) · Psychoanalysis (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Criminology (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 works) · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae