Marissa Schmitz
Biographic Data
| ID | 5437209 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Marissa Schmitz |
| GIVEN NAMES | Marissa |
| FAMILY NAME | Schmitz |
| SIGNATURE | SCHMITZ M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Cal Poly Humboldt |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 10 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
How politics shapes the outcomes of forest carbon finance
Ecosystem Service Commodification
In 2013 the state of California launched a cap-and-trade program with a groundbreaking protocol for improved forest management (IFM), providing a framework to monetize carbon sequestration in managed forests. Through in-depth interviews and document review, this research examines California's IFM program development as a case study in stakeholder-engaged ecosystem commodification. We consider how diverse, vested-interest actors contested rival pr…
Forest offsets and the California compliance market
Improved Forest Management (IFM) projects under the California cap-and-trade market allow production of new, non-traditional commodities: forest carbon offsets. Earlier analyses have considered forest offsets generated through tree planting in the Global South, as vehicles for sustainable development. However, the California IFM program is testing offset production in new geographic and forest management contexts: with offsets produced and consum…
Forest offsets and the California compliance market
Improved Forest Management (IFM) projects under the California cap-and-trade market allow production of new, non-traditional commodities: forest carbon offsets. Earlier analyses have considered forest offsets generated through tree planting in the Global South, as vehicles for sustainable development. However, the California IFM program is testing offset production in new geographic and forest management contexts: with offsets produced and consum…
How politics shapes the outcomes of forest carbon finance
Ecosystem Service Commodification
In 2013 the state of California launched a cap-and-trade program with a groundbreaking protocol for improved forest management (IFM), providing a framework to monetize carbon sequestration in managed forests. Through in-depth interviews and document review, this research examines California's IFM program development as a case study in stakeholder-engaged ecosystem commodification. We consider how diverse, vested-interest actors contested rival pr…
Ecosystem Service Commodification
In 2013 the state of California launched a cap-and-trade program with a groundbreaking protocol for improved forest management (IFM), providing a framework to monetize carbon sequestration in managed forests. Through in-depth interviews and document review, this research examines California's IFM program development as a case study in stakeholder-engaged ecosystem commodification. We consider how diverse, vested-interest actors contested rival pr…
Forest offsets and the California compliance market
Improved Forest Management (IFM) projects under the California cap-and-trade market allow production of new, non-traditional commodities: forest carbon offsets. Earlier analyses have considered forest offsets generated through tree planting in the Global South, as vehicles for sustainable development. However, the California IFM program is testing offset production in new geographic and forest management contexts: with offsets produced and consum…
How politics shapes the outcomes of forest carbon finance
Business (3 works) · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 works) · Ecology (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Forest Management and Policy (3 works) · Ecosystem (2 works) · Ecosystem services (2 works) · Environmental Conservation and Management (2 works) · Environmental resource management (2 works) · Finance (2 works)